>Does running 'virt-host-validate' point out any problems?# virt-host-validate QEMU: Checking for hardware virtualization : PASS QEMU: Checking for device /dev/kvm : PASS QEMU: Checking for device /dev/vhost-net : PASS QEMU: Checking for device /dev/net/tun : PASS LXC: Checking for Linux >= 2.6.26 : PASS>Have you installed libvirt-daemon-kvmThere is no such package. Instead I see ocaml-libvirt.x86_64 : OCaml binding for libvirt ruby-libvirt.x86_64 : Ruby bindings for libvirt fence-virtd-libvirt.x86_64 : Libvirt backend for fence-virtd fence-virtd-libvirt-qpid.x86_64 : Libvirt-qmf backend for fence-virtd libvirt-cim.i686 : A CIM provider for libvirt libvirt-cim.x86_64 : A CIM provider for libvirt libvirt-client.i686 : Client side library and utilities of the libvirt library libvirt-client.x86_64 : Client side library and utilities of the libvirt library libvirt-devel.i686 : Libraries, includes, etc. to compile with the libvirt library libvirt-devel.x86_64 : Libraries, includes, etc. to compile with the libvirt library libvirt-java.noarch : Java bindings for the libvirt virtualization API libvirt-java-devel.noarch : Compressed Java source files for libvirt-java libvirt-java-javadoc.noarch : Java documentation for libvirt-java libvirt-python.x86_64 : Python bindings for the libvirt library libvirt-qmf.x86_64 : QPid QMF interface to Libvirt libvirt-snmp.x86_64 : SNMP functionality for libvirt ocaml-libvirt-devel.x86_64 : Development files for ocaml-libvirt collectd-virt.x86_64 : Libvirt plugin for collectd fence-virtd-checkpoint.x86_64 : Cluster+Libvirt backend for fence-virtd libvirt.x86_64 : Library providing a simple virtualization API libvirt-lock-sanlock.x86_64 : Sanlock lock manager plugin for QEMU driver perl-Sys-Virt.x86_64 : Represent and manage a libvirt hypervisor connection virt-manager.x86_64 : Virtual Machine Manager Which one best matches? Regards, Mahmood On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:37 PM, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote: On 11/20/2013 09:58 AM, Mahmood Naderan wrote: [please don't top-post on technical lists]> > Error polling connection 'qemu:///system': internal error Cannot find suitable emulator for x86_64Have you installed libvirt-daemon-kvm? Does running 'virt-host-validate' point out any problems? -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
On 11/20/2013 12:01 PM, Mahmood Naderan wrote:>> Have you installed libvirt-daemon-kvm > There is no such package.Oh right, RHEL 6 uses the older scheme with fewer packages. And it appears that you are using a downstream fork of RHEL, given your previous mail:> > Installing for dependencies: > libvirt-client > x86_64 0.10.2-18.el6_4.14 sl-security 4.0 MIf you were using RHEL, I'd suggest opening a support ticket with Red Hat. But as you are using a downstream fork, I'm not sure what else to suggest that you try.> libvirt.x86_64 : Library providing a simple virtualization APIThis is the package that provided libvirt with qemu support in RHEL 6, and which got split into libvirt-daemon-* for Fedora. You may be missing the distro version of qemu (that is, your self-build qemu at /usr/local/bin/qemu-x86_64 is not the same as what RHEL ships, and since you are using the RHEL libvirt, it may not know to look for a self-built alternative).> On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:37 PM, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 11/20/2013 09:58 AM, Mahmood Naderan wrote: > > [please don't top-post on technical lists]This request still applies. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
>You may be missing the distro version of qemu (that is, your self-build >qemu at /usr/local/bin/qemu-x86_64 is not the same as what RHEL ships, >and since you are using the RHEL libvirt, it may not know to look for a >self-built alternative).Excuse me, but it seems that there is not way to uninstall the qemu which has been built from source. There is no target for uninstall. Is it enough to run "rm -rf /usr/local/bin/qemu*" or there are some other config staffs in other system directories? Regards, Mahmood