TSADOK, Shlomi (Shlomi)
2013-Nov-06 10:23 UTC
[libvirt-users] Calling 'virsh' from within a hook script - avoid deadlock?
I'm trying to create a hook that attaches several virtio-scsi disks to a starting vm, and it seems like the hook enters a deadlock while attempting to do so. Is there any workaround around this? Any better way, forking virsh execution somehow? Could anyone explain why this is creating a deadlock in the first place? Isn't libvirt multithreaded? Thanks for the help! Shlomi ### hook script: #!/bin/bash enum_scsi() { scsi_devices=`cd /dev;ls sd[^a]*` } gen_hba_xml() { cat > ./hba.xml << EOF <controller type='scsi' model='virtio-scsi'/> EOF } passthrough_start() { # create virtio-scsi HBA gen_hba_xml virsh attach-device --persistent $domain_name ./hba.xml rm -f ./hba.xml # attache scsi devices to guest enum_scsi for sd in ${scsi_devices[@]} do virsh attach-disk --persistent $domain_name /dev/${sd} ${sd} done } domain_name=$1 domain_event=$2 case $domain_event in start) passthrough_start ;; *) echo "qemu hook called with unexpected options $*" >&2 ;; esac ### starce libvirt: [root@localhost ~]# strace -f -p 14630 Process 14630 attached with 11 threads - interrupt to quit [pid 14640] futex(0xc34ebc, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 2303, NULL <unfinished ...> [pid 14638] futex(0xc34ebc, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 2303, NULL <unfinished ...> [pid 14637] futex(0xc34ebc, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 2303, NULL <unfinished ...> [pid 14636] futex(0xc34ebc, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 2303, NULL <unfinished ...> [pid 14635] futex(0x7fcc240ccd80, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 2, NULL <unfinished ...> [pid 14639] futex(0xc34ebc, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 2303, NULL <unfinished ...> [pid 14634] futex(0x7fcc240ccd80, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 2, NULL <unfinished ...> [pid 14631] restart_syscall(<... resuming interrupted call ...> <unfinished ...> [pid 14633] futex(0x7fcc240ccd80, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 2, NULL <unfinished ...> [pid 14630] restart_syscall(<... resuming interrupted call ...> <unfinished ...> [pid 14632] futex(0xc34e24, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 3091, NULL^C <unfinished ...> ... [pid 14630] poll([{fd=7, events=POLLIN}, {fd=9, events=POLLIN}, {fd=12, events=POLLIN}, {fd=13, events=POLLIN}, {fd=6, events=POLLIN}, {fd=14, events=POLLIN}, {fd=16, events=POLLIN}, {fd=18, events=POLLIN|POLLOUT}, {fd=24, events=POLLIN}], 9, 1927) = 1 ([{fd=18, revents=POLLOUT}]) [pid 14630] gettid() = 14630 [pid 14630] gettid() = 14630 [pid 14630] gettid() = 14630 [pid 14630] gettid() = 14630 [pid 14630] gettid() = 14630 [pid 14630] gettid() = 14630 [pid 14630] gettid() = 14630 [pid 14630] gettid() = 14630 [pid 14630] gettid() = 14630 [pid 14630] gettid() = 14630 [pid 14630] gettid() = 14630 [pid 14630] gettid() = 14630 [pid 14630] write(18, "\0\0\0\34keep\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\2\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 28) = 28 ... ### strace bash: [root@localhost ~]# strace -f -p 14783 Process 14783 attached - interrupt to quit wait4(-1, ...
Michal Privoznik
2013-Nov-06 15:17 UTC
Re: [libvirt-users] Calling 'virsh' from within a hook script - avoid deadlock?
On 06.11.2013 11:23, TSADOK, Shlomi (Shlomi) wrote:> I'm trying to create a hook that attaches several virtio-scsi disks to a > starting vm, > > and it seems like the hook enters a deadlock while attempting to do so. > > > > Is there any workaround around this? Any better way, forking virsh > execution somehow? > > > > Could anyone explain why this is creating a deadlock in the first place? > Isn't libvirt multithreaded? > > > > Thanks for the help! > > > > Shlomi > > > > ### hook script: > > > > #!/bin/bash > > > > enum_scsi() { > > scsi_devices=`cd /dev;ls sd[^a]*` > > } > > > > gen_hba_xml() { > > cat > ./hba.xml << EOF > > <controller type='scsi' model='virtio-scsi'/> > > EOF > > } > > > > passthrough_start() { > > # create virtio-scsi HBA > > gen_hba_xml > > virsh attach-device --persistent $domain_name ./hba.xml > > rm -f ./hba.xmlhttp://libvirt.org/hooks.html#recursive Do not do this. Michal
TSADOK, Shlomi (Shlomi)
2013-Nov-06 15:59 UTC
Re: [libvirt-users] Calling 'virsh' from within a hook script - avoid deadlock?
Yes.. I saw that, but I have to :) The issue was solved by converting the hook to Python and using 'subprocess.Popen'. deadlock is gone, all looks good. Regards Shlomi -----Original Message----- From: Michal Privoznik [mailto:mprivozn@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 5:17 PM To: TSADOK, Shlomi (Shlomi) Cc: libvirt-users@redhat.com Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] Calling 'virsh' from within a hook script - avoid deadlock? On 06.11.2013 11:23, TSADOK, Shlomi (Shlomi) wrote:> I'm trying to create a hook that attaches several virtio-scsi disks to > a starting vm, > > and it seems like the hook enters a deadlock while attempting to do so. > > > > Is there any workaround around this? Any better way, forking virsh > execution somehow? > > > > Could anyone explain why this is creating a deadlock in the first place? > Isn't libvirt multithreaded? > > > > Thanks for the help! > > > > Shlomi > > > > ### hook script: > > > > #!/bin/bash > > > > enum_scsi() { > > scsi_devices=`cd /dev;ls sd[^a]*` > > } > > > > gen_hba_xml() { > > cat > ./hba.xml << EOF > > <controller type='scsi' model='virtio-scsi'/> > > EOF > > } > > > > passthrough_start() { > > # create virtio-scsi HBA > > gen_hba_xml > > virsh attach-device --persistent $domain_name ./hba.xml > > rm -f ./hba.xmlhttp://libvirt.org/hooks.html#recursive Do not do this. Michal
Michal Privoznik
2013-Nov-07 09:16 UTC
Re: [libvirt-users] Calling 'virsh' from within a hook script - avoid deadlock?
On 06.11.2013 16:17, Michal Privoznik wrote:> On 06.11.2013 11:23, TSADOK, Shlomi (Shlomi) wrote: >> [...] > > http://libvirt.org/hooks.html#recursive > > Do not do this. > > Michal >Maybe I should explain a bit why this is not supported. It's true that libvirt is multithreaded. However, not in terms of multiple write/modify accesses to a single domain. That is, when a domain is being started up it is a modify access. Meanwhile, at some point during the transaction the startup hook script is called. If the script decides to start another modify transaction an deadlock occurs. Michal
Apparently Analagous Threads
- Calling 'virsh' from within a hook script - avoid deadlock?
- Re: Calling 'virsh' from within a hook script - avoid deadlock?
- Re: Calling 'virsh' from within a hook script - avoid deadlock?
- Re: Calling 'virsh' from within a hook script - avoid deadlock?
- Shares problem