Gareth S Bestor
2011-Aug-17 17:36 UTC
[libvirt-users] which vols added to storage pool during refresh?
(opps, actually meant to post this to libvirt-users instead of
libvirt-cim...)
We're looking at a problem when we have a libvirt pool defined, below
[root at xnl2192 ~]# virsh pool-dumpxml ScsiPool-host2
<pool type='scsi'>
<name>ScsiPool-host2</name>
<uuid>f2ea1882-881f-9f49-838d-39e070f68002</uuid>
<capacity>136583315456</capacity>
<allocation>136583315456</allocation>
<available>0</available>
<source>
<adapter name='host2'/>
</source>
<target>
<path>/dev/disk/by-id</path>
<permissions>
<mode>0700</mode>
<owner>-1</owner>
<group>-1</group>
</permissions>
</target>
</pool>
As you can see, this pool maps to /dev/disk/by-id. There may be a large
number of actual volume entries in /dev/disk/by-id, however it appears
only a distinct subset of them are actually added into the libvirt pool
when you do a pool-refresh. What does libvirt check when determining
which, and whether or not, to add one of these volume into the vol-list?
In particular, we have a case when one specific volume in /dev/disk/by-id
is *not* added into the pool, and no amount of pool-refresh makes a
difference. We did notice that if you remove all the sym links in
/dev/disk/by-id and do a pool-refresh, that libvirt re-scans the bus,
recreates the links in /dev/disk/by-id, and adds (some of) the volumes
back into the vol-list. But not this one problematic vol, so clearly there
is something about this vol that libvirt doesnt like and why it is
(deliberately?) not added to the pool.
What checks, etc does libvirt make against vols when determining whether
to add them to a pool?
- G
Dr. Gareth S. Bestor
IBM Senior Software Engineer
Systems & Technology Group - Systems Management Standards
971-285-6375 (mobile)
bestor at us.ibm.com_______________________________________________
Libvirt-cim mailing list
Libvirt-cim at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/attachments/20110817/b4ba44ff/attachment.htm>
Daniel P. Berrange
2011-Aug-17 17:44 UTC
[libvirt-users] which vols added to storage pool during refresh?
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:36:26AM -0700, Gareth S Bestor wrote:> As you can see, this pool maps to /dev/disk/by-id. There may be a large > number of actual volume entries in /dev/disk/by-id, however it appears > only a distinct subset of them are actually added into the libvirt pool > when you do a pool-refresh. What does libvirt check when determining > which, and whether or not, to add one of these volume into the vol-list? > > In particular, we have a case when one specific volume in /dev/disk/by-id > is *not* added into the pool, and no amount of pool-refresh makes a > difference. We did notice that if you remove all the sym links in > /dev/disk/by-id and do a pool-refresh, that libvirt re-scans the bus, > recreates the links in /dev/disk/by-id, and adds (some of) the volumes > back into the vol-list. But not this one problematic vol, so clearly there > is something about this vol that libvirt doesnt like and why it is > (deliberately?) not added to the pool. > > What checks, etc does libvirt make against vols when determining whether > to add them to a pool?If we have an error processing any volume, that will be skipped. There is one non-error related check though, that may cause a volume to be skipped: /* We don't create volumes for devices other than disk and cdrom * devices, but finding a device that isn't one of those types * isn't an error, either. */ if (!(device_type == VIR_STORAGE_DEVICE_TYPE_DISK || device_type == VIR_STORAGE_DEVICE_TYPE_ROM)) { retval = 0; goto out; } What value is in /sys/bus/scsi/devices/XXXXX/type for the LUN in question ? And is that value different for all the other LUNs in that HBA ? Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
Maybe Matching Threads
- virStoragePoolRefresh() returns before or after all new vols on path discovered?
- CESA-2012:0987 Low CentOS 6 sblim-cim-client2 Update
- [PATCH node] Remove libvirt-cim
- [PATCH] Make "xm mem-set" be lower bound on domX-min-mem
- CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 108, Issue 8