Eric Blake
2022-Jul-25 14:02 UTC
[Libguestfs] [nbdkit PATCH] tests: Better quoting for cleanup_fn
Testing with: ==#!/bin/bash . tests/functions.sh cleanup_fn echo 'a b' cleanup_fn echo 'c d' == gives output: ==a b c d == That is, our commands were munged by IFS splitting, because we stored commands in a flat variable. Fix it by instead using an array variable per cleanup_fn invocation. This does not fix the issue that commands are run in FIFO order; the comments in the recent test-nbd-client.sh mention that reverse order might be nicer, however, our existing kill_nbdkit() function assumes that it can call cleanup_fn during an existing cleanup function and that such cleanups will still be reached. Running cleanups in reverse order from the top level while still allowing multiple rounds of cleanup once cleanup is started is harder to achieve. --- If we like this, I'll apply the same patch to libnbd. Running the cleanups in reverse order is a tougher nut to crack; the nbdkit testsuite passed 'make check' when I did that (basically, swap the iteration of the for loop over _i in _run_cleanup_hooks), but that only tests the success paths, and it is the failure path of kill_nbdkit() where sane semantics are harder to guarantee with reverse ordering. tests/functions.sh.in | 14 +++++++++----- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/functions.sh.in b/tests/functions.sh.in index 6c5c481a..82f284a7 100644 --- a/tests/functions.sh.in +++ b/tests/functions.sh.in @@ -65,15 +65,18 @@ largest_qemu_disk=9223372035781033984 # # Run the command ???cmd [args]??? when the test script exits. This is # run in all cases when the script exits, so is a reliable way to -# clean up test files, external processes etc. +# clean up test files, external processes etc. Cleanup hooks are run +# in the order of registration. # # Examples: # cleanup_fn rm -f test.out # cleanup_fn kill $pid -declare -a _cleanup_hook +_cleanup_hook_count=0 cleanup_fn () { - _cleanup_hook[${#_cleanup_hook[@]}]="$@" + local _hook=_cleanup_hook$((_cleanup_hook_count++)) + declare -ag $_hook + eval "$_hook=(\"\$@\")" } _run_cleanup_hooks () @@ -84,8 +87,9 @@ _run_cleanup_hooks () trap '' INT QUIT TERM EXIT ERR echo $0: run cleanup hooks: exit code $_status - for (( _i = 0; _i < ${#_cleanup_hook[@]}; ++_i )); do - ${_cleanup_hook[_i]} + for (( _i = 0; _i < $_cleanup_hook_count; ++_i )); do + local -n _hook=_cleanup_hook$_i + "${_hook[@]}" done exit $_status -- 2.37.1
Laszlo Ersek
2022-Jul-25 14:13 UTC
[Libguestfs] [nbdkit PATCH] tests: Better quoting for cleanup_fn
On 07/25/22 16:02, Eric Blake wrote:> Testing with: > ==> #!/bin/bash > . tests/functions.sh > cleanup_fn echo 'a b' > cleanup_fn echo 'c d' > ==> > gives output: > ==> a b > c d > ==> > That is, our commands were munged by IFS splitting, because we stored > commands in a flat variable. Fix it by instead using an array > variable per cleanup_fn invocation. > > This does not fix the issue that commands are run in FIFO order; the > comments in the recent test-nbd-client.sh mention that reverse order > might be nicer, however, our existing kill_nbdkit() function assumes > that it can call cleanup_fn during an existing cleanup function and > that such cleanups will still be reached. Running cleanups in reverse > order from the top level while still allowing multiple rounds of > cleanup once cleanup is started is harder to achieve. > --- > > If we like this, I'll apply the same patch to libnbd. > > Running the cleanups in reverse order is a tougher nut to crack; the > nbdkit testsuite passed 'make check' when I did that (basically, swap > the iteration of the for loop over _i in _run_cleanup_hooks), but that > only tests the success paths, and it is the failure path of > kill_nbdkit() where sane semantics are harder to guarantee with > reverse ordering. > > tests/functions.sh.in | 14 +++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/functions.sh.in b/tests/functions.sh.in > index 6c5c481a..82f284a7 100644 > --- a/tests/functions.sh.in > +++ b/tests/functions.sh.in > @@ -65,15 +65,18 @@ largest_qemu_disk=9223372035781033984 > # > # Run the command ?cmd [args]? when the test script exits. This is > # run in all cases when the script exits, so is a reliable way to > -# clean up test files, external processes etc. > +# clean up test files, external processes etc. Cleanup hooks are run > +# in the order of registration. > # > # Examples: > # cleanup_fn rm -f test.out > # cleanup_fn kill $pid > -declare -a _cleanup_hook > +_cleanup_hook_count=0 > cleanup_fn () > { > - _cleanup_hook[${#_cleanup_hook[@]}]="$@" > + local _hook=_cleanup_hook$((_cleanup_hook_count++)) > + declare -ag $_hook > + eval "$_hook=(\"\$@\")" > } > > _run_cleanup_hooks () > @@ -84,8 +87,9 @@ _run_cleanup_hooks () > trap '' INT QUIT TERM EXIT ERR > echo $0: run cleanup hooks: exit code $_status > > - for (( _i = 0; _i < ${#_cleanup_hook[@]}; ++_i )); do > - ${_cleanup_hook[_i]} > + for (( _i = 0; _i < $_cleanup_hook_count; ++_i )); do > + local -n _hook=_cleanup_hook$_i > + "${_hook[@]}" > done > > exit $_status > > > > _______________________________________________ > Libguestfs mailing list > Libguestfs at redhat.com > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs >Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek at redhat.com>
Laszlo Ersek
2022-Jul-26 05:13 UTC
[Libguestfs] [nbdkit PATCH] tests: Better quoting for cleanup_fn
On 07/25/22 16:02, Eric Blake wrote:> Testing with: > ==> #!/bin/bash > . tests/functions.sh > cleanup_fn echo 'a b' > cleanup_fn echo 'c d' > ==> > gives output: > ==> a b > c d > ==> > That is, our commands were munged by IFS splitting, because we stored > commands in a flat variable. Fix it by instead using an array > variable per cleanup_fn invocation. > > This does not fix the issue that commands are run in FIFO order; the > comments in the recent test-nbd-client.sh mention that reverse order > might be nicer, however, our existing kill_nbdkit() function assumes > that it can call cleanup_fn during an existing cleanup function and > that such cleanups will still be reached. Running cleanups in reverse > order from the top level while still allowing multiple rounds of > cleanup once cleanup is started is harder to achieve. > --- > > If we like this, I'll apply the same patch to libnbd. > > Running the cleanups in reverse order is a tougher nut to crack; the > nbdkit testsuite passed 'make check' when I did that (basically, swap > the iteration of the for loop over _i in _run_cleanup_hooks), but that > only tests the success paths, and it is the failure path of > kill_nbdkit() where sane semantics are harder to guarantee with > reverse ordering. > > tests/functions.sh.in | 14 +++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/functions.sh.in b/tests/functions.sh.in > index 6c5c481a..82f284a7 100644 > --- a/tests/functions.sh.in > +++ b/tests/functions.sh.in > @@ -65,15 +65,18 @@ largest_qemu_disk=9223372035781033984 > # > # Run the command ?cmd [args]? when the test script exits. This is > # run in all cases when the script exits, so is a reliable way to > -# clean up test files, external processes etc. > +# clean up test files, external processes etc. Cleanup hooks are run > +# in the order of registration. > # > # Examples: > # cleanup_fn rm -f test.out > # cleanup_fn kill $pid > -declare -a _cleanup_hook > +_cleanup_hook_count=0 > cleanup_fn () > { > - _cleanup_hook[${#_cleanup_hook[@]}]="$@" > + local _hook=_cleanup_hook$((_cleanup_hook_count++)) > + declare -ag $_hook > + eval "$_hook=(\"\$@\")" > } > > _run_cleanup_hooks () > @@ -84,8 +87,9 @@ _run_cleanup_hooks () > trap '' INT QUIT TERM EXIT ERR > echo $0: run cleanup hooks: exit code $_status > > - for (( _i = 0; _i < ${#_cleanup_hook[@]}; ++_i )); do > - ${_cleanup_hook[_i]} > + for (( _i = 0; _i < $_cleanup_hook_count; ++_i )); do > + local -n _hook=_cleanup_hook$_i > + "${_hook[@]}"BTW, "nameref" variables seem like a relatively new addition to bash; for example RHEL7 does not have them. Interestingly, the RHEL7 manual also does not document a nameref-like construct that *does* work in RHEL7, namely: $ bar=foo $ baz=bar $ echo ${!baz} foo Oh wait, the RHEL7 manual does document it, my search-fu wasn't good enough. It's called "indirect expansion": If the first character of parameter is an exclamation point (!), a level of variable indirection is introduced. Bash uses the value of the variable formed from the rest of parameter as the name of the variable; this variable is then expanded and that value is used in the rest of the substitution, rather than the value of parameter itself. This is known as indirect expansion. The exceptions to this are the expansions of ${!prefix*} and ${!name[@]} described below. The exclamation point must immediately follow the left brace in order to intro? duce indirection. However, I couldn't find a syntax that made this feature work with array variables. In particular, ${!name[@]} stands for "List of array keys". I wonder if the bash release notes mention "nameref" as a more flexible version of "indirect expansion"... Hm, nameref was new in bash-4.3 <https://lwn.net/Articles/589566/>, and RHEL7 has bash-4.2.46-35.el7_9, so the lack of "nameref" is understandable (not that it matters for upstream nbdkit :)); indirect expansion is not mentioned however as a similar feature. The above section of the manual got updated for namerefs, FWIW: https://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/bash.html#Shell-Parameter-Expansion If the first character of parameter is an exclamation point (!), and parameter is not a nameref, it introduces a level of indirection [...] Laszlo> done > > exit $_status > > > > _______________________________________________ > Libguestfs mailing list > Libguestfs at redhat.com > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs >