Laszlo Ersek
2021-Nov-24 10:37 UTC
[Libguestfs] [PATCH v2 3/5] daemon/parted: simplify print_partition_table() prototype
Since commit 994ca1f8ebcc ("daemon: Reimplement 'part_get_mbr_part_type' API in OCaml.", 2018-05-02), we've not had any calls to print_partition_table() that would pass a "true" argument for the "add_m_option" parameter. Remove the parameter, and inside part_get_mbr_part_type(), remove the dead branch. Relatedly, update the comment on the "print_partition_table_machine_readable" OCaml function, originally from commit 32e661f42169 ("daemon: Reimplement ?part_list? API in OCaml.", 2017-07-27). Because print_partition_table() now passes "-m" to "parted" unconditionally, and there are no use cases left that would *forbid* "-m", "print_partition_table_machine_readable" is almost equivalent to print_partition_table() -- modulo the enforcement of the "BYT;" header. Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek at redhat.com> --- Notes: v2: - new patch: unrelated refactoring I'd found possible while working the BZ daemon/parted.c | 17 ++++++----------- daemon/parted.ml | 6 ++---- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/daemon/parted.c b/daemon/parted.c index ef7b90056b41..3a723762c345 100644 --- a/daemon/parted.c +++ b/daemon/parted.c @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ get_table_field (const char *line, int n) } static char * -print_partition_table (const char *device, bool add_m_option) +print_partition_table (const char *device) { char *out; CLEANUP_FREE char *err = NULL; @@ -349,14 +349,9 @@ print_partition_table (const char *device, bool add_m_option) udev_settle (); - if (add_m_option) - r = command (&out, &err, "parted", "-m", "-s", "--", device, - "unit", "b", - "print", NULL); - else - r = command (&out, &err, "parted", "-s", "--", device, - "unit", "b", - "print", NULL); + r = command (&out, &err, "parted", "-m", "-s", "--", device, + "unit", "b", + "print", NULL); udev_settle (); @@ -383,7 +378,7 @@ do_part_get_bootable (const char *device, int partnum) return -1; } - CLEANUP_FREE char *out = print_partition_table (device, true); + CLEANUP_FREE char *out = print_partition_table (device); if (!out) return -1; @@ -555,7 +550,7 @@ do_part_get_name (const char *device, int partnum) return NULL; if (STREQ (parttype, "gpt")) { - CLEANUP_FREE char *out = print_partition_table (device, true); + CLEANUP_FREE char *out = print_partition_table (device); if (!out) return NULL; diff --git a/daemon/parted.ml b/daemon/parted.ml index 45c387987483..29b98c4806c1 100644 --- a/daemon/parted.ml +++ b/daemon/parted.ml @@ -57,10 +57,8 @@ let part_get_mbr_id device partnum (* It's printed in hex, possibly with a leading space. *) sscanf out " %x" identity -(* This is not equivalent to print_partition_table in the C code, as - * it only deals with the ?-m? option output, and it partially parses - * that. If we convert other functions that don't use the ?-m? version - * we'll have to refactor this. XXX +(* This is almost equivalent to print_partition_table in the C code. The + * difference is that here we enforce the "BYT;" header internally. *) let print_partition_table_machine_readable device udev_settle (); -- 2.19.1.3.g30247aa5d201
Laszlo Ersek
2021-Nov-24 10:43 UTC
[Libguestfs] [PATCH v2 3/5] daemon/parted: simplify print_partition_table() prototype
On 11/24/21 11:37, Laszlo Ersek wrote:> Since commit 994ca1f8ebcc ("daemon: Reimplement 'part_get_mbr_part_type' > API in OCaml.", 2018-05-02), we've not had any calls to > print_partition_table() that would pass a "true" argument for theTypo: should be '"false" argument'. Will fix upon merge or in v3. Sorry! Laszlo> "add_m_option" parameter. > > Remove the parameter, and inside part_get_mbr_part_type(), remove the dead > branch. > > Relatedly, update the comment on the > "print_partition_table_machine_readable" OCaml function, originally from > commit 32e661f42169 ("daemon: Reimplement ?part_list? API in OCaml.", > 2017-07-27). Because print_partition_table() now passes "-m" to "parted" > unconditionally, and there are no use cases left that would *forbid* "-m", > "print_partition_table_machine_readable" is almost equivalent to > print_partition_table() -- modulo the enforcement of the "BYT;" header. > > Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek at redhat.com> > --- > > Notes: > v2: > > - new patch: unrelated refactoring I'd found possible while working the > BZ > > daemon/parted.c | 17 ++++++----------- > daemon/parted.ml | 6 ++---- > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/daemon/parted.c b/daemon/parted.c > index ef7b90056b41..3a723762c345 100644 > --- a/daemon/parted.c > +++ b/daemon/parted.c > @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ get_table_field (const char *line, int n) > } > > static char * > -print_partition_table (const char *device, bool add_m_option) > +print_partition_table (const char *device) > { > char *out; > CLEANUP_FREE char *err = NULL; > @@ -349,14 +349,9 @@ print_partition_table (const char *device, bool add_m_option) > > udev_settle (); > > - if (add_m_option) > - r = command (&out, &err, "parted", "-m", "-s", "--", device, > - "unit", "b", > - "print", NULL); > - else > - r = command (&out, &err, "parted", "-s", "--", device, > - "unit", "b", > - "print", NULL); > + r = command (&out, &err, "parted", "-m", "-s", "--", device, > + "unit", "b", > + "print", NULL); > > udev_settle (); > > @@ -383,7 +378,7 @@ do_part_get_bootable (const char *device, int partnum) > return -1; > } > > - CLEANUP_FREE char *out = print_partition_table (device, true); > + CLEANUP_FREE char *out = print_partition_table (device); > if (!out) > return -1; > > @@ -555,7 +550,7 @@ do_part_get_name (const char *device, int partnum) > return NULL; > > if (STREQ (parttype, "gpt")) { > - CLEANUP_FREE char *out = print_partition_table (device, true); > + CLEANUP_FREE char *out = print_partition_table (device); > if (!out) > return NULL; > > diff --git a/daemon/parted.ml b/daemon/parted.ml > index 45c387987483..29b98c4806c1 100644 > --- a/daemon/parted.ml > +++ b/daemon/parted.ml > @@ -57,10 +57,8 @@ let part_get_mbr_id device partnum > (* It's printed in hex, possibly with a leading space. *) > sscanf out " %x" identity > > -(* This is not equivalent to print_partition_table in the C code, as > - * it only deals with the ?-m? option output, and it partially parses > - * that. If we convert other functions that don't use the ?-m? version > - * we'll have to refactor this. XXX > +(* This is almost equivalent to print_partition_table in the C code. The > + * difference is that here we enforce the "BYT;" header internally. > *) > let print_partition_table_machine_readable device > udev_settle (); >