Libguestfs - Apr 2020 - [PATCH nbdkit] server: Fix parameters of lock_request, unlock_request on fallback path.

Patch itself is not controversial.

However I do wonder if we want to change all these constructs so that
instead of using #ifdef we use something like:

  if (HAVE_PIPE2) {
    // normal path
  }
  else {
    // fallback
  }

(It wouldn't actually work as written above because HAVE_PIPE2 is not
always defined, but you get the idea.)

This would allow us to test that the fallback paths still compile.

Rich.

On Haiku which doesn't have pipe2 we were using the fallback path.
However a previous change to remove the conn parameter of lock_request
and unlock_request had not been made to this code and so it failed to
compile.

Fixes: commit 91023f269d4cea56f573a1aa0d880b12052f6e1e
---
 server/connections.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/server/connections.c b/server/connections.c
index c7b55ca1..cc552b90 100644
--- a/server/connections.c
+++ b/server/connections.c
@@ -277,25 +277,25 @@ new_connection (int sockin, int sockout, int nworkers)
      * non-atomicity okay.
      */
     assert (thread_model <= NBDKIT_THREAD_MODEL_SERIALIZE_ALL_REQUESTS);
-    lock_request (NULL);
+    lock_request ();
     if (pipe (conn->status_pipe)) {
       perror ("pipe");
-      unlock_request (NULL);
+      unlock_request ();
       goto error2;
     }
     if (set_nonblock (set_cloexec (conn->status_pipe[0])) == -1) {
       perror ("fcntl");
       close (conn->status_pipe[1]);
-      unlock_request (NULL);
+      unlock_request ();
       goto error2;
     }
     if (set_nonblock (set_cloexec (conn->status_pipe[1])) == -1) {
       perror ("fcntl");
       close (conn->status_pipe[0]);
-      unlock_request (NULL);
+      unlock_request ();
       goto error2;
     }
-    unlock_request (NULL);
+    unlock_request ();
 #endif
   }
 
-- 
2.25.0

On 4/28/20 10:19 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Haiku which doesn't have pipe2 we were using the fallback path.
> However a previous change to remove the conn parameter of lock_request
> and unlock_request had not been made to this code and so it failed to
> compile.
> 
> Fixes: commit 91023f269d4cea56f573a1aa0d880b12052f6e1e
> ---
>   server/connections.c | 10 +++++-----
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
D'oh - we've already had a couple of fixes to 91023f26 and friends: 
edb9aeae, 6a0dee192, and now this.

ACK.


-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org