Eric Blake
2019-Aug-15 02:10 UTC
[Libguestfs] [nbdkit PATCH] data, memory: Optimize .zero > PAGE_SIZE
When sparse_array_zero() is used for a range larger than a page, there's no need to waste time in memset() or is_zero() - we already know the page will be free()d. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> --- Here's a fun one :) common/sparse/sparse.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/sparse/sparse.c b/common/sparse/sparse.c index cb44743c..5e085763 100644 --- a/common/sparse/sparse.c +++ b/common/sparse/sparse.c @@ -343,10 +343,13 @@ sparse_array_zero (struct sparse_array *sa, uint32_t count, uint64_t offset) n = count; if (p) { - memset (p, 0, n); + if (n < PAGE_SIZE) + memset (p, 0, n); + else + assert (p == *l2_page); /* If the whole page is now zero, free it. */ - if (is_zero (*l2_page, PAGE_SIZE)) { + if (n == PAGE_SIZE || is_zero (*l2_page, PAGE_SIZE)) { if (sa->debug) nbdkit_debug ("%s: freeing zero page at offset %" PRIu64, __func__, offset); -- 2.20.1
Richard W.M. Jones
2019-Aug-15 10:25 UTC
Re: [Libguestfs] [nbdkit PATCH] data, memory: Optimize .zero > PAGE_SIZE
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 09:10:15PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:> When sparse_array_zero() is used for a range larger than a page, > there's no need to waste time in memset() or is_zero() - we already > know the page will be free()d. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> > --- > > Here's a fun one :) > > common/sparse/sparse.c | 7 +++++-- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/common/sparse/sparse.c b/common/sparse/sparse.c > index cb44743c..5e085763 100644 > --- a/common/sparse/sparse.c > +++ b/common/sparse/sparse.c > @@ -343,10 +343,13 @@ sparse_array_zero (struct sparse_array *sa, uint32_t count, uint64_t offset) > n = count; > > if (p) { > - memset (p, 0, n); > + if (n < PAGE_SIZE) > + memset (p, 0, n); > + else > + assert (p == *l2_page); > > /* If the whole page is now zero, free it. */ > - if (is_zero (*l2_page, PAGE_SIZE)) { > + if (n == PAGE_SIZE || is_zero (*l2_page, PAGE_SIZE)) {Should this be n >= PAGE_SIZE? My guess is no because lookup (..&n..) can't return n larger than the remaining size of the page (ie. n <= PAGE_SIZE).> if (sa->debug) > nbdkit_debug ("%s: freeing zero page at offset %" PRIu64, > __func__, offset);Anyway, ACK. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/
Eric Blake
2019-Aug-15 11:42 UTC
Re: [Libguestfs] [nbdkit PATCH] data, memory: Optimize .zero > PAGE_SIZE
On 8/15/19 5:25 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 09:10:15PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: >> When sparse_array_zero() is used for a range larger than a page, >> there's no need to waste time in memset() or is_zero() - we already >> know the page will be free()d. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> >> --- >> >> Here's a fun one :) >> >> common/sparse/sparse.c | 7 +++++-- >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/common/sparse/sparse.c b/common/sparse/sparse.c >> index cb44743c..5e085763 100644 >> --- a/common/sparse/sparse.c >> +++ b/common/sparse/sparse.c >> @@ -343,10 +343,13 @@ sparse_array_zero (struct sparse_array *sa, uint32_t count, uint64_t offset) >> n = count; >> >> if (p) { >> - memset (p, 0, n); >> + if (n < PAGE_SIZE) >> + memset (p, 0, n); >> + else >> + assert (p == *l2_page); >> >> /* If the whole page is now zero, free it. */ >> - if (is_zero (*l2_page, PAGE_SIZE)) { >> + if (n == PAGE_SIZE || is_zero (*l2_page, PAGE_SIZE)) { > > Should this be n >= PAGE_SIZE? My guess is no because lookup (..&n..) > can't return n larger than the remaining size of the page > (ie. n <= PAGE_SIZE).Correct, but that's action at a distance; using >= doesn't change semantics and brings the action closer to the code. I'll make that tweak.> >> if (sa->debug) >> nbdkit_debug ("%s: freeing zero page at offset %" PRIu64, >> __func__, offset); > > Anyway, ACK. > > Rich. >-- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
Possibly Parallel Threads
- Re: [nbdkit PATCH] data, memory: Optimize .zero > PAGE_SIZE
- [nbdkit PATCH 04/10] plugins: Wire up in-memory plugin support for NBD_INFO_INIT_STATE
- [PATCH nbdkit] include: Annotate function parameters with attribute((nonnull)).
- [PATCH nbdkit v2 0/2] Use of attribute(()).
- [PATCH nbdkit v5 FINAL 14/19] data, memory: Implement extents.