Pino Toscano
2013-Dec-12 14:07 UTC
Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH] sysprep: handle distro specific sysv scripts
On Thursday 12 December 2013 15:01:07 Olaf Hering wrote:> On Thu, Dec 12, Pino Toscano wrote: > > On Thursday 12 December 2013 14:49:36 Olaf Hering wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 12, Pino Toscano wrote: > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > I think that your Should-Start handling is broken. Required means > > > the > > > given file can not properly work without the listed servers, > > > insserv > > > will error out. Should means it can very well work without them if > > > they are not present or enabled. Otherwise the given file has to > > > be > > > scheduled after the listed services. > > > > Sure, and I said there's no guarantee that the firstboot command can > > work without any of the other system services. > > What if my command requires the system time to be set, but it is > > scheduled by insserv before $time is available? > > $all should imply $time.Sure, but as a Should-Start means it is a weak dependency, and can be skipped, which is what I don't want.> But looking at the patch again, there is > appearently no insserv involved. Its just a hardcoded ln command. > So why is the script not exectued at the very end in your setup?As said in my first email:> (Firstboot scripts are not working in Debian anyway, see #1019388.)aka, an invocation of update-rc.d (which on Debian invokes insserv) or insserv directly is needed to get them working. -- Pino Toscano
Olaf Hering
2013-Dec-12 15:27 UTC
Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH] sysprep: handle distro specific sysv scripts
On Thu, Dec 12, Pino Toscano wrote:> Sure, but as a Should-Start means it is a weak dependency, and can be > skipped, which is what I don't want.Are you saying in Debian the Should-Start is not handled properly? Even if Should-Start is weak it still has to be taken into account. Olaf
Pino Toscano
2013-Dec-12 15:30 UTC
Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH] sysprep: handle distro specific sysv scripts
On Thursday 12 December 2013 16:27:30 Olaf Hering wrote:> On Thu, Dec 12, Pino Toscano wrote: > > Sure, but as a Should-Start means it is a weak dependency, and can > > be > > skipped, which is what I don't want. > > Are you saying in Debian the Should-Start is not handled properly? > Even if Should-Start is weak it still has to be taken into account.No, I'm saying a weak dependency is no guarantee the provided firstboot commands can run successfully, and running them after $all should provide a better safety. -- Pino Toscano
Seemingly Similar Threads
- Re: [PATCH] sysprep: handle distro specific sysv scripts
- Re: [PATCH] sysprep: handle distro specific sysv scripts
- Re: [PATCH] sysprep: handle distro specific sysv scripts
- [PATCH] sysprep: handle distro specific sysv scripts
- Re: [PATCH] sysprep: handle distro specific sysv scripts