Hello, I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems. Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the same issue? thanks -- Anton Yurchenko<phila@dg.net.ua> Digital Generation _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Hello Anton, Wednesday, October 8, 2003, 4:49:30 PM, you wrote: I am using HTB3 with more than 10 megabits customers, and amount of classes about 100-200 without any problem. Only one what i do - i make filter with lowest priority, to not pass ass unclassified traffic to default class, just to drop it. I think you just need review your classes, because also if you have any rate more 468 Kbit, you need change r2q or quantum. AY> Hello, AY> I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems. AY> Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC AY> related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached AY> to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more AY> ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and AY> rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the AY> same issue? thanks -- Best regards, Denis mailto:admin@ams-sat.com _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
I''ve used HTB and CBQ to protect MPEG2 traffic streams from UDP traffic over 100 Mb/s interfaces. I have not yet attempted this with 1000 Mb/s interfaces, but I hope to get to that this year (it it much more difficult to measure accurately at this speed). On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 09:49, Anton Yurchenko wrote:> Hello, > > I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems. > Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC > related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached > to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more > ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and > rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the > same issue? thanks-- Lawrence MacIntyre 865.574.8696 lpz@ornl.gov Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Performance Information Infrastructure Technology Group
Anton Yurchenko wrote:> Hello, > > I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems. > Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC > related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached > to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more > ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and > rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the > same issue? thanks >check your burst and quantum settings. maybe they are too low. bye, wilfried _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com wrote:>Hello Anton, > >Wednesday, October 8, 2003, 4:49:30 PM, you wrote: > >I am using HTB3 with more than 10 megabits customers, and >amount of classes about 100-200 without any problem. >Only one what i do - i make filter with lowest priority, to not pass >ass unclassified traffic to default class, just to drop it. I think >you just need review your classes, because also if you have any rate >more 468 Kbit, you need change r2q or quantum. > >the problem was observed even when only adding a qdisc, no classes. how can this be?>AY> Hello, > >AY> I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems. >AY> Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC >AY> related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached >AY> to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more >AY> ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and >AY> rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the >AY> same issue? thanks > > > > > >-- Anton Yurchenko<phila@dg.net.ua> Digital Generation _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
On Thursday 09 October 2003 10:44, Anton Yurchenko wrote:> nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com wrote: > >Hello Anton, > > > >Wednesday, October 8, 2003, 4:49:30 PM, you wrote: > > > >I am using HTB3 with more than 10 megabits customers, and > >amount of classes about 100-200 without any problem. > >Only one what i do - i make filter with lowest priority, to not pass > >ass unclassified traffic to default class, just to drop it. I think > >you just need review your classes, because also if you have any rate > >more 468 Kbit, you need change r2q or quantum. > > the problem was observed even when only adding a qdisc, no classes. how > can this be?What''s the output of tc -s -d qdisc show dev eth0 tc -s -d class show dev eth0 Stef -- stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/