-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have to DSL connections with the same providrer, but different public IP''s, they are connected to my box to one interface each, and i am doing load balancing right now, i would like to know if it is possible to do an ethernet bonding, keeping the load balancing, and treat both ethernets as one. I have already set up the bond, but i do not get right the routing tables. Anyone? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0 iQA/AwUBPtJHOn7diNnrrZKsEQJCqgCfaNyCK40JeGPq7cYuEO21UC3ShG4Ani3K NHCBFeydseieOEveBBwAJYkN =p5pU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
On Monday 26 May 2003 18:56, GoMi wrote:> I have to DSL connections with the same providrer, but different public > IP''s, they are connected to my box to one interface each, and i am doing > load balancing right now, i would like to know if it is possible to do an > ethernet bonding, keeping the load balancing, and treat both ethernets as > one. I have already set up the bond, but i do not get right the routing > tables. Anyone?I think you also need support from your ISP if you want to do this. Stef -- stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
On Mon, 2003-05-26 at 12:56, GoMi wrote:> > I have to DSL connections with the same providrer, but different > public IP''s, they are connected to my box to one interface each, and i > am doing load balancing right now, i would like to know if it is > possible to do an ethernet bonding, keeping the load balancing, and > treat both ethernets as one. I have already set up the bond, but i do > not get right the routing tables. Anyone?To the best of my knowledge what you are attempting to do will not work without cooperation from the ISP. Usually bonding requires it to be done on both ends not just one. I am only aware of 1 ISP ever to do this in the U.S. It was Copper Mountain Networks, who is no longer in existence. If anyone knows of another ISP offering bonded DSL lines please let me know. So in your case I do not think it will get much better than things are if you are already doing load balancing/redundancy. -- Sincerely, William L. Thomson Jr. Support Group Obsidian-Studios, Inc. 3548 Jamestown Ln. Jacksonville, FL 32223 Phone/Fax 904.260.2445 http://www.obsidian-studios.com _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
On Mon, 26 May 2003 18:56:27 +0200 "GoMi" <gomiuk@hotmail.com> wrote: : : -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- : Hash: SHA1 : : I have to DSL connections with the same providrer, but different public IP''s, they are connected to my box to one interface each, and i am doing load balancing right now, i would like to know if it is possible to do an ethernet bonding, keeping the load balancing, and treat both ethernets as one. I have already set up the bond, but i do not get right the routing tables. Anyone? If you''re going to use bonding, you need the proper switch support from the other side. For more info, read /usr/src/linux/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt There''s enough info in there, I think. ;) -- _____________________________________________________________ "Engineering does not require science. Science helps a lot but people built perfectly good brick walls long before they knew why cement works." -Alan Cox