LARTC - Apr 2003 - Everything up and running with HTB/SFQ

I dropped the entire PRIO setup and went with a single HTB qdisc with
SFQs in each class, and it''s working really well. Am I correct in the
observation that the rate of a HTB class doesn''t matter if all classes
have different prios?

Thanks to everyone for their help (and to the authors for the HOWTO)!

-- 
Frank v Waveren                                      Fingerprint: 21A7 C7F3
fvw@[var.cx|stack.nl|chello.nl] ICQ#10074100            1FF3 47FF 545C CB53
Public key: hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net/fvw@var.cx            7BD9 09C0 3AC1 6DF2
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

On Wednesday 23 April 2003 05:55, Frank v Waveren wrote:
> I dropped the entire PRIO setup and went with a single HTB qdisc with
> SFQs in each class, and it''s working really well. Am I correct in
the
> observation that the rate of a HTB class doesn''t matter if all
classes
> have different prios?
No.  The rate is still used as a minimum.  So each class will get at least its 
rate.  The prio is used to distribute the remaining bandwidht AND to give 
some classes a lower latency.

Stef

-- 

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/