hi!
Is there any other way than ingress-shaping if I''m running a
transparent
proxy on my firewall/router and want to limit http downloads? I think it
is not very clever to shape the outgoing bandwidth, because I don''t
want
to throttle bandwidth if the pages are allready cached and squid propably
won''t care how fast it can deliver when getting the pages from the net.
Or
is there any possibility to mark those packets with squid? e.g. different
marks for cached/non-cached content or something like that.
best regards
Sebastian
--
Sebastian ''spax'' Pape | Better to remain silent and
be thought a fool
mailto: sebastian@p-a-p-e.de | than to speak and remove all doubt.
gpg: http://p-a-p-e.de/gpg.asc |
--- Do you want to know more? http://www.p-a-p-e.de/ ---
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Hi If you are using Transparent cache ( Squid) better you use delay pools, it works greate like large downloads to be controled hare ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sebastian ''spax'' Pape" <pape@rbg.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> To: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 7:29 PM Subject: [LARTC] Traffic shaping with transparent proxy> hi! > > Is there any other way than ingress-shaping if I''m running a transparent > proxy on my firewall/router and want to limit http downloads? I think it > is not very clever to shape the outgoing bandwidth, because I don''t want > to throttle bandwidth if the pages are allready cached and squid propably > won''t care how fast it can deliver when getting the pages from the net. Or > is there any possibility to mark those packets with squid? e.g. different > marks for cached/non-cached content or something like that. > > best regards > > Sebastian > > -- > Sebastian ''spax'' Pape | Better to remain silent and be thought afool> mailto: sebastian@p-a-p-e.de | than to speak and remove all doubt. > gpg: http://p-a-p-e.de/gpg.asc | > --- Do you want to know more? http://www.p-a-p-e.de/ --- > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ >_______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
hi!> If you are using Transparent cache ( Squid) > better you use delay pools, it works greate like large downloads to be > controledI''m not really up to date with delay pools, but as far as I remember they only shape the traffic of squid among all squid-users and don''t know anything about the available bandwidth. So the problem to allocate bandwidth to squid (vs. other traffic like, ssh, ftp, smtp, ...) still remains or am I getting something wrong here? best regards Sebastian -- Sebastian ''spax'' Pape | Better to remain silent and be thought a fool mailto: sebastian@p-a-p-e.de | than to speak and remove all doubt. gpg: http://p-a-p-e.de/gpg.asc | --- Do you want to know more? http://www.p-a-p-e.de/ --- _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Hi If that is the case, iam also working on same some recomendation given in this list is htb and imq, iam still working, hope it make help you this hint to work hare ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sebastian ''spax'' Pape" <pape@rbg.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> To: "hare ram" <hareram@sol.net.in> Cc: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 7:51 PM Subject: Re: [LARTC] Traffic shaping with transparent proxy> hi! > > > If you are using Transparent cache ( Squid) > > better you use delay pools, it works greate like large downloads to be > > controled > > I''m not really up to date with delay pools, but as far as I remember they > only shape the traffic of squid among all squid-users and don''t know > anything about the available bandwidth. So the problem to allocate > bandwidth to squid (vs. other traffic like, ssh, ftp, smtp, ...) still > remains or am I getting something wrong here? > > best regards > > Sebastian > > -- > Sebastian ''spax'' Pape | Better to remain silent and be thought afool> mailto: sebastian@p-a-p-e.de | than to speak and remove all doubt. > gpg: http://p-a-p-e.de/gpg.asc | > --- Do you want to know more? http://www.p-a-p-e.de/ --- >_______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
On Monday 14 April 2003 15:59, Sebastian ''spax'' Pape wrote:> hi! > > Is there any other way than ingress-shaping if I''m running a transparent > proxy on my firewall/router and want to limit http downloads? I think it > is not very clever to shape the outgoing bandwidth, because I don''t want > to throttle bandwidth if the pages are allready cached and squid propably > won''t care how fast it can deliver when getting the pages from the net. Or > is there any possibility to mark those packets with squid? e.g. different > marks for cached/non-cached content or something like that.You can try to enable the delay pools in squid. This allows you to shape bandwidth within squid. And you can shape on the size of the fetched objects. Very handy. Big downloads are slow, small downloads are very fast. Stef -- stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/