LARTC - Jul 2002 - Questions about HTB classes with an SFQ

I have read most of the documents regarding both Htb and Sfq and I
still am not sure if it is best to put the Sfq on the leaf Htb or to put
it closer to the root class.  All of the docs for Htb say to put it on the
leaf classes but the Sfq stuff says to put it closer to the root(but not
on the root).  If my case every leaf class is only going to be one
machine/user.  I want to have fairness between machines(I don''t want
one
person to get all of the bandwidth).  I don''t think putting Sfq on the
leaf classes will get me this, but I haven''t been able to find a place
that says this for sure...

				josh

sfq MUST be leaf because it is classless.
devik

On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Joshua Snyder wrote:
> I have read most of the documents regarding both Htb and Sfq and I
> still am not sure if it is best to put the Sfq on the leaf Htb or to put
> it closer to the root class.  All of the docs for Htb say to put it on the
> leaf classes but the Sfq stuff says to put it closer to the root(but not
> on the root).  If my case every leaf class is only going to be one
> machine/user.  I want to have fairness between machines(I don''t
want one
> person to get all of the bandwidth).  I don''t think putting Sfq on
the
> leaf classes will get me this, but I haven''t been able to find a
place
> that says this for sure...
>
> 				josh
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
>