> is the naming of classes essential for building them correctly? is
parent 1:1 classid 10:0 somehow different from parent 1:1 classid 1:2?
up to now i thought classid was only a name and the parent would be
enough to make the classes'' positions in the tree unambiguously...
I think I mentioned this in my review of the recent howto updates.
Here''s the explanation from
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/
Note: In general (not just for HTB but for all qdiscs and classes in
tc), handles are written x:y where x is an integer identifying a
qdisc and y is an integer identifying a class belonging to that
qdisc. The handle for a qdisc must have zero for its y value and
the handle for a class must have a non-zero value for its y value. The
"1:" above is treated as "1:0".