Hi, I have 3 isdn connections. Is it possible to loadbalace the bandwidth using a linux box in between the routers and the client. I will be very much greatful to you if someone helps me in this. -Logu _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
You might try multi-path routing. It doesn''t exactly load balance the
lines, as in aggregating the bandwidth together, but it does allow N
number of simultaneous connections (where N would be the maximum number
of different routes you have).
In your scenario, let''s say you have the 3 routers with IP addresses of
1.1.1.1/30, 2.2.2.2/30, and 3.3.3.3/30. Now, you have your Linux
firewall/gateway/router/thingy between the routers and the client. On
your Linux box, you could have 3 separate network cards each connected
to one of the routers, or you could have a single network card connected
to all three routers via a hub or switch (switch would probably be
better). Let''s say you have one network card. In that scenario, you
would assign an IP address in each of the network ranges for the each of
the routers. I.e., 1.1.1.2/30, 2.2.2.3/30, 3.3.3.4/30 (note: these IP
address are probably completely incorrect for assignment in the network
range I have chosen, just using them as examples; you would get usable
IP''s from your ISP). To assign these IP address, use the
''ip'' command.
ip addr add 1.1.1.2/30 brd + dev eth0
ip addr add 2.2.2.3/30 brd + dev eth0
ip addr add 3.3.3.4/30 brd + dev eth0
Now, you will need to setup the multi-path route as your default route.
You can specify the ''equalize'' parameter if you like, but I
have found
that it doesn''t do exactly what you might expect it to do.
ip route add default nexthop via 1.1.1.1 dev eth0 \
nexthop via 2.2.2.2 dev eth0 \
nexthop via 3.3.3.3 dev eth0
And that should take care of that. Now all of this is assuming that you
have multiple, different IP ranges for your 3 ISDN lines. If they are
all in the same network range, you can forego having 3 IP''s assigned to
the same network card on your firewall. In that case you would only
need one. Then substitue appropriately for the router IP addresses.
Logu wrote:
>Hi,
>I have 3 isdn connections. Is it possible to loadbalace the bandwidth using
>a linux box in between the routers and the client. I will be very much
>greatful to you if someone helps me in this.
>
>-Logu
>
>
>_________________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
>http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:
http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/
>
--
Jason A. Pattie
pattieja@pcxperience.com
Hello, On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Logu wrote:> Hi, > I have 3 isdn connections. Is it possible to loadbalace the bandwidth using > a linux box in between the routers and the client. I will be very much > greatful to you if someone helps me in this.Heh, I see you on another list, with the same question. This time I have more tutorials for you :) http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/~julian/dgd-usage.txt http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/~julian/> -LoguRegards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Hi, This is my network My LAN IP is 172.16.1.0/255.255.255.0 I have two router which has LAN IP 172.16.1.204 and another one 172.16.1.205 My Linux machine IP is 172.16.1.1. I have two interface for linux machine one is conected to switch where all my windows machines are connected and another one 172.16.1.2 is connected to hub where my routers are connected I set windows machines gateway as 172.16.1.1 Now how should i activate multipath routing -Logu ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason A. Pattie" <pattieja@pcxperience.com> To: "Logu" <apachelog@yahoo.com> Cc: "Linux-routing" <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 8:11 PM Subject: Re: [LARTC] Loadbalancing the gateway> You might try multi-path routing. It doesn''t exactly load balance the > lines, as in aggregating the bandwidth together, but it does allow N > number of simultaneous connections (where N would be the maximum number > of different routes you have). > > In your scenario, let''s say you have the 3 routers with IP addresses of > 1.1.1.1/30, 2.2.2.2/30, and 3.3.3.3/30. Now, you have your Linux > firewall/gateway/router/thingy between the routers and the client. On > your Linux box, you could have 3 separate network cards each connected > to one of the routers, or you could have a single network card connected > to all three routers via a hub or switch (switch would probably be > better). Let''s say you have one network card. In that scenario, you > would assign an IP address in each of the network ranges for the each of > the routers. I.e., 1.1.1.2/30, 2.2.2.3/30, 3.3.3.4/30 (note: these IP > address are probably completely incorrect for assignment in the network > range I have chosen, just using them as examples; you would get usable > IP''s from your ISP). To assign these IP address, use the ''ip'' command. > > ip addr add 1.1.1.2/30 brd + dev eth0 > ip addr add 2.2.2.3/30 brd + dev eth0 > ip addr add 3.3.3.4/30 brd + dev eth0 > > Now, you will need to setup the multi-path route as your default route. > You can specify the ''equalize'' parameter if you like, but I have found > that it doesn''t do exactly what you might expect it to do. > > ip route add default nexthop via 1.1.1.1 dev eth0 \ > nexthop via 2.2.2.2 dev eth0 \ > nexthop via 3.3.3.3 dev eth0 > > And that should take care of that. Now all of this is assuming that you > have multiple, different IP ranges for your 3 ISDN lines. If they are > all in the same network range, you can forego having 3 IP''s assigned to > the same network card on your firewall. In that case you would only > need one. Then substitue appropriately for the router IP addresses. > > Logu wrote: > > >Hi, > >I have 3 isdn connections. Is it possible to loadbalace the bandwidthusing> >a linux box in between the routers and the client. I will be very much > >greatful to you if someone helps me in this. > > > >-Logu > > > > > >_________________________________________________________ > >Do You Yahoo!? > >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > >http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/> > > > -- > Jason A. Pattie > pattieja@pcxperience.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/ _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
You actually only have two connections then that Linux can see. One, I''m assuming, is a router that has multiple connections to the ISP which it assigns as the same IP address (multi-line ISDN is similar). You will need to setup your multipath default route like so on the Linux box: If eth0 is assigned 172.16.1.2 on your Linux router, then ip route add default nexthop via 172.16.1.204 dev eth0 nexthop via 172.16.1.205 dev eth0 If you want to make one route work more than the other, you can assign weights to the routes right after each dev entry in the route statement (i.e., "ip route ... dev eth0 weight 2 ... dev eth0 weight 1", this would send twice as many connections out the first route as the second route). Remember that if you do not use the ''equalize'' modifier to the route statement, you get traffic broken up across the links on a per session basis. If using the ''equalize'' parameter, it will be broken across the links on a per packet basis. Logu wrote:>Hi, >This is my network >My LAN IP is 172.16.1.0/255.255.255.0 >I have two router which has LAN IP 172.16.1.204 and another one 172.16.1.205 >My Linux machine IP is 172.16.1.1. >I have two interface for linux machine one is conected to switch where all >my windows machines are connected and another one 172.16.1.2 is connected to >hub where my routers are connected >I set windows machines gateway as 172.16.1.1 > >Now how should i activate multipath routing > >-Logu >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Jason A. Pattie" <pattieja@pcxperience.com> >To: "Logu" <apachelog@yahoo.com> >Cc: "Linux-routing" <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> >Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 8:11 PM >Subject: Re: [LARTC] Loadbalancing the gateway > > >>You might try multi-path routing. It doesn''t exactly load balance the >>lines, as in aggregating the bandwidth together, but it does allow N >>number of simultaneous connections (where N would be the maximum number >>of different routes you have). >> >>In your scenario, let''s say you have the 3 routers with IP addresses of >>1.1.1.1/30, 2.2.2.2/30, and 3.3.3.3/30. Now, you have your Linux >>firewall/gateway/router/thingy between the routers and the client. On >>your Linux box, you could have 3 separate network cards each connected >>to one of the routers, or you could have a single network card connected >>to all three routers via a hub or switch (switch would probably be >>better). Let''s say you have one network card. In that scenario, you >>would assign an IP address in each of the network ranges for the each of >>the routers. I.e., 1.1.1.2/30, 2.2.2.3/30, 3.3.3.4/30 (note: these IP >>address are probably completely incorrect for assignment in the network >>range I have chosen, just using them as examples; you would get usable >>IP''s from your ISP). To assign these IP address, use the ''ip'' command. >> >>ip addr add 1.1.1.2/30 brd + dev eth0 >>ip addr add 2.2.2.3/30 brd + dev eth0 >>ip addr add 3.3.3.4/30 brd + dev eth0 >> >>Now, you will need to setup the multi-path route as your default route. >> You can specify the ''equalize'' parameter if you like, but I have found >>that it doesn''t do exactly what you might expect it to do. >> >>ip route add default nexthop via 1.1.1.1 dev eth0 \ >> nexthop via 2.2.2.2 dev eth0 \ >> nexthop via 3.3.3.3 dev eth0 >> >>And that should take care of that. Now all of this is assuming that you >>have multiple, different IP ranges for your 3 ISDN lines. If they are >>all in the same network range, you can forego having 3 IP''s assigned to >>the same network card on your firewall. In that case you would only >>need one. Then substitue appropriately for the router IP addresses. >> >>Logu wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>>I have 3 isdn connections. Is it possible to loadbalace the bandwidth >>> >using > >>>a linux box in between the routers and the client. I will be very much >>>greatful to you if someone helps me in this. >>> >>>-Logu >>> >>> >>>_________________________________________________________ >>>Do You Yahoo!? >>>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com >>> >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl >>>http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: >>> >http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/ > >>-- >>Jason A. Pattie >>pattieja@pcxperience.com >> >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl >>http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: >> >http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/ > > >_________________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > >_______________________________________________ >LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl >http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/ >-- Jason A. Pattie pattieja@pcxperience.com
Hi Jason, thanks for your response. I am not able to ping outside from client machines. I have a doubt. If the client and router is on different network, is it necessary to implement NATing.> You actually only have two connections then that Linux can see. One, > I''m assuming, is a router that has multiple connections to the ISP which > it assigns as the same IP address (multi-line ISDN is similar). > > You will need to setup your multipath default route like so on the Linux > box: > > If eth0 is assigned 172.16.1.2 on your Linux router, then > > ip route add default nexthop via 172.16.1.204 dev eth0 nexthop via > 172.16.1.205 dev eth0 > > If you want to make one route work more than the other, you can assign > weights to the routes right after each dev entry in the route statement > (i.e., "ip route ... dev eth0 weight 2 ... dev eth0 weight 1", this > would send twice as many connections out the first route as the second > route). Remember that if you do not use the ''equalize'' modifier to the > route statement, you get traffic broken up across the links on a per > session basis. If using the ''equalize'' parameter, it will be broken > across the links on a per packet basis. > > Logu wrote: > > >Hi, > >This is my network > >My LAN IP is 172.16.1.0/255.255.255.0 > >I have two router which has LAN IP 172.16.1.204 and another one172.16.1.205> >My Linux machine IP is 172.16.1.1. > >I have two interface for linux machine one is conected to switch whereall> >my windows machines are connected and another one 172.16.1.2 is connectedto> >hub where my routers are connected > >I set windows machines gateway as 172.16.1.1 > > > >Now how should i activate multipath routing > > > >-Logu > >>You might try multi-path routing. It doesn''t exactly load balance the > >>lines, as in aggregating the bandwidth together, but it does allow N > >>number of simultaneous connections (where N would be the maximum number > >>of different routes you have). > >> > >>In your scenario, let''s say you have the 3 routers with IP addresses of > >>1.1.1.1/30, 2.2.2.2/30, and 3.3.3.3/30. Now, you have your Linux > >>firewall/gateway/router/thingy between the routers and the client. On > >>your Linux box, you could have 3 separate network cards each connected > >>to one of the routers, or you could have a single network card connected > >>to all three routers via a hub or switch (switch would probably be > >>better). Let''s say you have one network card. In that scenario, you > >>would assign an IP address in each of the network ranges for the each of > >>the routers. I.e., 1.1.1.2/30, 2.2.2.3/30, 3.3.3.4/30 (note: these IP > >>address are probably completely incorrect for assignment in the network > >>range I have chosen, just using them as examples; you would get usable > >>IP''s from your ISP). To assign these IP address, use the ''ip'' command. > >> > >>ip addr add 1.1.1.2/30 brd + dev eth0 > >>ip addr add 2.2.2.3/30 brd + dev eth0 > >>ip addr add 3.3.3.4/30 brd + dev eth0 > >> > >>Now, you will need to setup the multi-path route as your default route. > >> You can specify the ''equalize'' parameter if you like, but I have found > >>that it doesn''t do exactly what you might expect it to do. > >> > >>ip route add default nexthop via 1.1.1.1 dev eth0 \ > >> nexthop via 2.2.2.2 dev eth0 \ > >> nexthop via 3.3.3.3 dev eth0 > >> > >>And that should take care of that. Now all of this is assuming that you > >>have multiple, different IP ranges for your 3 ISDN lines. If they are > >>all in the same network range, you can forego having 3 IP''s assigned to > >>the same network card on your firewall. In that case you would only > >>need one. Then substitue appropriately for the router IP addresses. > >> > >>Logu wrote: > >> > >>>Hi, > >>>I have 3 isdn connections. Is it possible to loadbalace the bandwidth > >>> > >using > > > >>>a linux box in between the routers and the client. I will be very much > >>>greatful to you if someone helps me in this. > >>> > >>>-Logu > >>>_________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Of course, unless the other network knows how to route to the network your client resides on, and I''m sure it probably can''t. Logu wrote:>Hi Jason, >thanks for your response. >I am not able to ping outside from client machines. >I have a doubt. If the client and router is on different network, is it >necessary to implement NATing. > >>You actually only have two connections then that Linux can see. One, >>I''m assuming, is a router that has multiple connections to the ISP which >>it assigns as the same IP address (multi-line ISDN is similar). >> >>You will need to setup your multipath default route like so on the Linux >>box: >> >>If eth0 is assigned 172.16.1.2 on your Linux router, then >> >>ip route add default nexthop via 172.16.1.204 dev eth0 nexthop via >>172.16.1.205 dev eth0 >> >>If you want to make one route work more than the other, you can assign >>weights to the routes right after each dev entry in the route statement >>(i.e., "ip route ... dev eth0 weight 2 ... dev eth0 weight 1", this >>would send twice as many connections out the first route as the second >>route). Remember that if you do not use the ''equalize'' modifier to the >>route statement, you get traffic broken up across the links on a per >>session basis. If using the ''equalize'' parameter, it will be broken >>across the links on a per packet basis. >> >>Logu wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>>This is my network >>>My LAN IP is 172.16.1.0/255.255.255.0 >>>I have two router which has LAN IP 172.16.1.204 and another one >>> >172.16.1.205 > >>>My Linux machine IP is 172.16.1.1. >>>I have two interface for linux machine one is conected to switch where >>> >all > >>>my windows machines are connected and another one 172.16.1.2 is connected >>> >to > >>>hub where my routers are connected >>>I set windows machines gateway as 172.16.1.1 >>> >>>Now how should i activate multipath routing >>> >>>-Logu >>> >>>>You might try multi-path routing. It doesn''t exactly load balance the >>>>lines, as in aggregating the bandwidth together, but it does allow N >>>>number of simultaneous connections (where N would be the maximum number >>>>of different routes you have). >>>> >>>>In your scenario, let''s say you have the 3 routers with IP addresses of >>>>1.1.1.1/30, 2.2.2.2/30, and 3.3.3.3/30. Now, you have your Linux >>>>firewall/gateway/router/thingy between the routers and the client. On >>>>your Linux box, you could have 3 separate network cards each connected >>>>to one of the routers, or you could have a single network card connected >>>>to all three routers via a hub or switch (switch would probably be >>>>better). Let''s say you have one network card. In that scenario, you >>>>would assign an IP address in each of the network ranges for the each of >>>>the routers. I.e., 1.1.1.2/30, 2.2.2.3/30, 3.3.3.4/30 (note: these IP >>>>address are probably completely incorrect for assignment in the network >>>>range I have chosen, just using them as examples; you would get usable >>>>IP''s from your ISP). To assign these IP address, use the ''ip'' command. >>>> >>>>ip addr add 1.1.1.2/30 brd + dev eth0 >>>>ip addr add 2.2.2.3/30 brd + dev eth0 >>>>ip addr add 3.3.3.4/30 brd + dev eth0 >>>> >>>>Now, you will need to setup the multi-path route as your default route. >>>>You can specify the ''equalize'' parameter if you like, but I have found >>>>that it doesn''t do exactly what you might expect it to do. >>>> >>>>ip route add default nexthop via 1.1.1.1 dev eth0 \ >>>> nexthop via 2.2.2.2 dev eth0 \ >>>> nexthop via 3.3.3.3 dev eth0 >>>> >>>>And that should take care of that. Now all of this is assuming that you >>>>have multiple, different IP ranges for your 3 ISDN lines. If they are >>>>all in the same network range, you can forego having 3 IP''s assigned to >>>>the same network card on your firewall. In that case you would only >>>>need one. Then substitue appropriately for the router IP addresses. >>>> >>>>Logu wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hi, >>>>>I have 3 isdn connections. Is it possible to loadbalace the bandwidth >>>>> >>>using >>> >>>>>a linux box in between the routers and the client. I will be very much >>>>>greatful to you if someone helps me in this. >>>>> >>>>>-Logu >>>>> > > > >_________________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > >_______________________________________________ >LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl >http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/ >-- Jason A. Pattie pattieja@pcxperience.com