klibc - May 2021 - Bug#943425: Debian #943425: klibc: [s390x] setjmp/longjmp do not save/restore all registers in use

On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 20:24 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 17:32 +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> [...]
> > > > > @klibc list: as indicated earlier, I can provide a
patch if needed
> > > > > (though it should be obvious).
> > 
> > hpa, maks, bwh: any of you taking these two or should I send patches
> > and possibly NMU klibc in Debian?
> 
> Please send patches.  If you have a test base that could catch bugs
test *case*
> like this (without writing lists of registers in the test itself), that
> would be really useful.
-- 
Ben Hutchings
It is easier to change the specification to fit the program
than vice versa.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<https://lists.zytor.com/archives/klibc/attachments/20210505/2b503da4/attachment.sig>

Ben Hutchings dixit:
>> > hpa, maks, bwh: any of you taking these two or should I send
patches
>> > and possibly NMU klibc in Debian?
>>
>> Please send patches.  If you have a test base that could catch bugs
>
>test *case*
>
>> like this (without writing lists of registers in the test itself), that
>> would be really useful.
Unfortunately, I do not, other than, ?run mksh?s testsuite?. This
seems to highly depend on compiler decisions (what to spill where
and when).

Patches for klibc upstream git attched; I?m currently trying to test
them, will report.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
Solange man keine schmutzigen Tricks macht, und ich meine *wirklich*
schmutzige Tricks, wie bei einer doppelt verketteten Liste beide
Pointer XORen und in nur einem Word speichern, funktioniert Boehm ganz
hervorragend.		-- Andreas Bogk ?ber boehm-gc in d.a.s.r
-------------- next part --------------