Oleg Verych wrote:> Peter, i ask you to permit discussion of `dash' in the klibc list. > Herbert, is it OK for you?It's fine with me if it's okay with Herbert. However, I reserve the right to reverse the decision if the volume goes out of hand. -hpa
Peter, i ask you to permit discussion of `dash' in the klibc list. Pulled reasons are, that bugs and followups are distributed in bug tracking systems with arbitrary decisions. In the klibc there are also changes, that can be discussed widely, and opinions with possible solutions published. So far i have two problems. First is proposed change for test(1): <http://bugs.debian.org/431320> [patch 03/03] dash, test: recognize NULL argument as not a number Second is `read -t' change in klibc's dash. It was showed, that this is incompatible change, that can be implemented in scripting. <http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/2007-September/002168.html> Herbert, is it OK for you? (Also i'd like to know if development is shared with original NetBSD team.) Thanks. ____
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:03:32PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:> > Herbert, is it OK for you? > (Also i'd like to know if development is shared with original NetBSD > team.)I think it makes more sense to just create a mailing list for dash instead. I'll talk to Dave Miller about it. Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Possibly Parallel Threads
- Size and performance efficient rewriting of the `dash.test` built-in
- Re: [PATCH] Avoid using dc in git-count-objects
- [Bridge] [PATCH] Module use count must be updated as bridges are created/destroyed
- [patch v2] dash fix for job control off warning
- dash signal weirdness