All, I?d like your feedback and testing of a *early-but-near-to-beta-quality* build of IronRuby.Rack, packaged in a RubyGem with some very simple scripts to configure rack-based applications for running on ASP.NET<http://www.asp.net/>and deploying to IIS <http://www.iis.net/> on Windows. *INSTALL* First you''ll need IronRuby 1.0 for .NET 4.0<http://ironruby.codeplex.com/releases/view/25901>installed: http://ironruby.codeplex.com/releases/view/25901#DownloadId=116524 Since it?s a for-the-mailing-list-only preview, I am not publishing it to rubygems.org until I?ve gotten enough of your feedback that it?s ready, so you?ll have to first download the gem from: http://jimmy.schementi.com/downloads/ironruby-rack-0.0.9-universal-dotnet.gem And then install it with your IronRuby installation: D:\>igem install path\to\ironruby-rack-0.0.9-universal-dotnet.gem This gem packages up the following components: - IronRuby.Rack.dll: integration between Rack and ASP.NET - Cassini.exe: a open-source development-time web server - rack2aspnet <app_path> [rails|sinatra]: takes a Rack application and enables it to run on ASP.NET - deploy2iis <app_name> <app_path>: takes a Rack-enabled ASP.NETapplication and deploys it to the IIS web server. *USAGE* Lets take a tiny Sinatra app and deploy it to IIS. Given this app: D:\>cd demo D:\>more app.rb require ''rubygems'' require ''sinatra'' get ''/'' do ''hi'' end Run rack2aspnet to set it up for running on ASP.NET: D:\demo>rack2aspnet . sinatra rack2aspnet copied IronRuby.Rack, Cassini, and your local copy of IronRuby to the "bin" directory, a config.ru for sinatra (if not present already), and a web.config all pre-configured to point at your local IronRuby installation: - bin\Cassini.exe - bin\ir.exe - bin\ir.exe.config - bin\IronRuby.dll - bin\IronRuby.Libraries.dll - bin\IronRuby.Libraries.Yaml.dll - bin\IronRuby.Rack.dll - bin\Microsoft.Dynamic.dll - bin\Microsoft.Scripting.dll - config.ru - log - web.config Because it''s been ASP.NET-ified, it can run on any ASP.NET web-server; this gem includes Cassini.exe: D:\demo>bin\Cassini.exe D:\demo 9202 / Now this app can be deployed to an IIS web server with deploy2iis: D:\demo>deploy2iis myapp d:\demo Gives IIS_IUSRS FullControl to d:\demo myapp has been created successfully. myapp has been configured successfully. IIS Restarted Note: you''ll still have to give IIS_IUSRS read-only access to your IronRuby installation; the script will enable this in the future. You can now navigate to the Sinatra app at http://localhost/myapp, which will be running on IIS. *FEEDBACK* For now, just reply to the list with any major issues you find. Feel free to try it with your own apps too, but make sure they run OK on IronRuby first. If you find some bugs and what to take a stab at fixing them yourself, you can find the source code here: http://github.com/jschementi/ironruby/tree/master/Hosts/IronRuby.Rack Enjoy, ~Jimmy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20100702/399f9db5/attachment.html>
Jimmy,
This is great! Thanks for your work.
I''ve run into a few issues so far:
1) not IronRuby.Rack''s fault, but the latest rack (1.2.1) breaks the
minimal
test app above due to this issue:
http://github.com/rack/rack/issues/issue/32
(I had to apply the patch mentioned via that link to get things working
w/ rack 1.2.1)
2) Is there any way you can detect if sintra is not already installed when
running: rack2aspnet . sinatra
I did not have the gem installed, and so I received an error when
browsing to the app via cassini
If possible, it would be cool to warn the user that sinatra (or rails)
is not installed when running rack2aspnet
3) Very minor - I created the app.rb like above, and then ran rack2aspnet.
At first, I was a little confused why my app.rb wasn''t used at
all, and
instead, some default text from the config.ru was used instead.
Is it possible to detect if app.rb already exists, and use it by
default if so (from the config.ru)?
Will continue working with this, thanks again!
Best Regards,
Kevin Radcliffe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20100706/b1df8611/attachment.html>
This is great, Jimmy! Thanks! I tried the simple example you explain below, and everything worked except for deploying to IIS. Probably something I did or didn''t do, but it looks like IIS is looking in the wrong spot for my web.config file. I''ll try to dig further when I have a bit more time. Cheers, Ryan From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jimmy Schementi Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 3:06 PM To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org Subject: [Ironruby-core] Preview of ironruby-rack gem All, I''d like your feedback and testing of a early-but-near-to-beta-quality build of IronRuby.Rack, packaged in a RubyGem with some very simple scripts to configure rack-based applications for running on ASP.NET <http://www.asp.net/> and deploying to IIS <http://www.iis.net/> on Windows. INSTALL First you''ll need IronRuby 1.0 for .NET <http://ironruby.codeplex.com/releases/view/25901> 4.0 installed: http://ironruby.codeplex.com/releases/view/25901#DownloadId=116524 Since it''s a for-the-mailing-list-only preview, I am not publishing it to rubygems.org until I''ve gotten enough of your feedback that it''s ready, so you''ll have to first download the gem from: http://jimmy.schementi.com/downloads/ironruby-rack-0.0.9-universal-dotnet.ge m And then install it with your IronRuby installation: D:\>igem install path\to\ironruby-rack-0.0.9-universal-dotnet.gem This gem packages up the following components: * IronRuby.Rack.dll: integration between Rack and ASP.NET * Cassini.exe: a open-source development-time web server * rack2aspnet <app_path> [rails|sinatra]: takes a Rack application and enables it to run on ASP.NET * deploy2iis <app_name> <app_path>: takes a Rack-enabled ASP.NET application and deploys it to the IIS web server. USAGE Lets take a tiny Sinatra app and deploy it to IIS. Given this app: D:\>cd demo D:\>more app.rb require ''rubygems'' require ''sinatra'' get ''/'' do ''hi'' end Run rack2aspnet to set it up for running on ASP.NET: D:\demo>rack2aspnet . sinatra rack2aspnet copied IronRuby.Rack, Cassini, and your local copy of IronRuby to the "bin" directory, a config.ru for sinatra (if not present already), and a web.config all pre-configured to point at your local IronRuby installation: * bin\Cassini.exe * bin\ir.exe * bin\ir.exe.config * bin\IronRuby.dll * bin\IronRuby.Libraries.dll * bin\IronRuby.Libraries.Yaml.dll * bin\IronRuby.Rack.dll * bin\Microsoft.Dynamic.dll * bin\Microsoft.Scripting.dll * config.ru * log * web.config Because it''s been ASP.NET-ified, it can run on any ASP.NET web-server; this gem includes Cassini.exe: D:\demo>bin\Cassini.exe D:\demo 9202 / Now this app can be deployed to an IIS web server with deploy2iis: D:\demo>deploy2iis myapp d:\demo Gives IIS_IUSRS FullControl to d:\demo myapp has been created successfully. myapp has been configured successfully. IIS Restarted Note: you''ll still have to give IIS_IUSRS read-only access to your IronRuby installation; the script will enable this in the future. You can now navigate to the Sinatra app at http://localhost/myapp, which will be running on IIS. FEEDBACK For now, just reply to the list with any major issues you find. Feel free to try it with your own apps too, but make sure they run OK on IronRuby first. If you find some bugs and what to take a stab at fixing them yourself, you can find the source code here: http://github.com/jschementi/ironruby/tree/master/Hosts/IronRuby.Rack Enjoy, ~Jimmy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20100706/63e80ee6/attachment-0001.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 12353 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20100706/63e80ee6/attachment-0001.png>
From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Radcliffe
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 1:11 PM
To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Preview of ironruby-rack gem
3) Very minor - I created the app.rb like above, and then ran rack2aspnet.
At first, I was a little confused why my app.rb wasn''t used at
all, and
instead, some default text from the config.ru was used instead.
Is it possible to detect if app.rb already exists, and use it by
default if so (from the config.ru)?
I hit this, too. If nothing else, just don''t put a default app in the
config.ru at all and let the developer add it. I know you only add the
config.ru if it doesn''t already exist. I suppose it''s a toss
up as to
whether to show a default message or leave it blank. I can go either way,
but I kinda lean toward blank.
Ryan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20100706/20329912/attachment.html>
Ryan, Jimmy,
1) I hit the issue also with deploy2iis.
It looks like rack\deploy\iis.rb thinks it is setting the permissions, but
they don''t actually get set.
Here is the output I got:
C:\Users\kradcliffe\jsRackTest\testPerms>deploy2iis myapp .
Gives IIS_IUSRS FullControl to C:\Users\kradcliffe\jsRackTest\testPerms
However, when I looked at the actual directory perms, IIS_IUSRS was added as
a user, but with no perms at all.
Manually setting the perms to include FullControl worked fine.
2) After that, the app pool didn''t like the app because by default it
went
into an older framework app pool.
3) I set it to the 4.0 app pool, but still no dice, because by default my
4.0 app pool does not allow 32 bit apps (which win32api requires)
Updated my 4.0 app pool to enable 32-bit apps. (in a prod scenario,
probably better to have a seperate 32-bit 4.0 app pool)
After that, the simple sample app worked properly.
Best Regards,
Kevin Radcliffe
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Ryan Riley <ryan.riley at
panesofglass.org>wrote:
> This is great, Jimmy! Thanks! I tried the simple example you explain
> below, and everything worked except for deploying to IIS. Probably
something
> I did or didn?t do, but it looks like IIS is looking in the wrong spot for
> my web.config file. I?ll try to dig further when I have a bit more time.
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ryan
>
>
>
> *From:* ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:
> ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] *On Behalf Of *Jimmy Schementi
> *Sent:* Friday, July 02, 2010 3:06 PM
> *To:* ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
> *Subject:* [Ironruby-core] Preview of ironruby-rack gem
>
>
>
> All,
>
> I?d like your feedback and testing of a *early-but-near-to-beta-quality*
build
> of IronRuby.Rack, packaged in a RubyGem with some very simple scripts to
> configure rack-based applications for running on
ASP.NET<http://www.asp.net/>and deploying to
> IIS <http://www.iis.net/> on Windows.
>
>
>
> *INSTALL*
>
>
>
> First you''ll need IronRuby 1.0 for .NET
4.0<http://ironruby.codeplex.com/releases/view/25901>installed:
>
> http://ironruby.codeplex.com/releases/view/25901#DownloadId=116524
>
>
>
> Since it?s a for-the-mailing-list-only preview, I am not publishing it to
> rubygems.org until I?ve gotten enough of your feedback that it?s ready, so
> you?ll have to first download the gem from:
>
>
http://jimmy.schementi.com/downloads/ironruby-rack-0.0.9-universal-dotnet.gem
>
>
>
> And then install it with your IronRuby installation:
>
> D:\>igem install path\to\ironruby-rack-0.0.9-universal-dotnet.gem
>
>
>
> This gem packages up the following components:
>
> - IronRuby.Rack.dll: integration between Rack and ASP.NET
> - Cassini.exe: a open-source development-time web server
> - rack2aspnet <app_path> [rails|sinatra]: takes a Rack application
and
> enables it to run on ASP.NET
> - deploy2iis <app_name> <app_path>: takes a Rack-enabled
ASP.NETapplication and deploys it to the IIS web server.
>
> *USAGE*
>
>
>
> Lets take a tiny Sinatra app and deploy it to IIS. Given this app:
>
>
>
> D:\>cd demo
>
>
>
> D:\>more app.rb
>
> require ''rubygems''
>
> require ''sinatra''
>
>
>
> get ''/'' do
>
> ''hi''
>
> end
>
>
>
> Run rack2aspnet to set it up for running on ASP.NET:
>
>
>
> D:\demo>rack2aspnet . sinatra
>
>
>
> rack2aspnet copied IronRuby.Rack, Cassini, and your local copy of IronRuby
> to the "bin" directory, a config.ru for sinatra (if not present
already),
> and a web.config all pre-configured to point at your local IronRuby
> installation:
>
> - bin\Cassini.exe
> - bin\ir.exe
> - bin\ir.exe.config
> - bin\IronRuby.dll
> - bin\IronRuby.Libraries.dll
> - bin\IronRuby.Libraries.Yaml.dll
> - bin\IronRuby.Rack.dll
> - bin\Microsoft.Dynamic.dll
> - bin\Microsoft.Scripting.dll
> - config.ru
> - log
> - web.config
>
> Because it''s been ASP.NET-ified, it can run on any ASP.NET
web-server;
> this gem includes Cassini.exe:
>
>
>
> D:\demo>bin\Cassini.exe D:\demo 9202 /
>
>
>
> Now this app can be deployed to an IIS web server with deploy2iis:
>
>
>
> D:\demo>deploy2iis myapp d:\demo
>
> Gives IIS_IUSRS FullControl to d:\demo
>
> myapp has been created successfully.
>
> myapp has been configured successfully.
>
> IIS Restarted
>
>
>
> Note: you''ll still have to give IIS_IUSRS read-only access to your
IronRuby
> installation; the script will enable this in the future.
>
>
>
> You can now navigate to the Sinatra app at http://localhost/myapp, which
> will be running on IIS.
>
>
>
> *FEEDBACK*
>
>
>
> For now, just reply to the list with any major issues you find. Feel free
> to try it with your own apps too, but make sure they run OK on IronRuby
> first.
>
>
>
> If you find some bugs and what to take a stab at fixing them yourself, you
> can find the source code here:
>
> http://github.com/jschementi/ironruby/tree/master/Hosts/IronRuby.Rack
>
>
>
>
>
> Enjoy,
>
> ~Jimmy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20100707/3620027b/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 12353 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20100707/3620027b/attachment-0001.png>
Jimmy, As mentioned before, it appears (at least on my own Windows 7 x64 system) that add_acl (in lib\rack\deploy\iis.rb) was not giving FullControl rights to IIS_IUSRS as expected. This results in the "cannot read configuration file" that Ryan reported above. I was able to get the system to give appropriate rights to IIS_IUSRS but in a very strange way: I had to give it 2 FileSystemAccessRules, one simpler one and the full one (that you already had in iis.rb) If I give it one or the other but not BOTH, it will add IIS_IUSRS as a user of the app directory, but will NOT give it any permissions at all. Here''s the gist with my minor edits (in case it is helpful). (again, this is from lib\rack\deploy\iis.rb): http://gist.github.com/467279 Unfortunately, I''m not really sure WHY this is the case. It seems strange to be required to essentially add 2 rules that appear to do the same thing. Best Regards, Kevin Radcliffe -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20100707/5e783223/attachment.html>
Hi,
I''m checking out the new IronRuby.Rack utils with a small web
application
(not the sample one) I have here.
The first problems I had were related to version problems since the project
had been created using version 1.0.0.0 (and I''m using 1.1). Small fixes
for
the references in the project made this problem go away.
Another problem was that the virtual directory on the IIS server was created
using the default application pool, which uses .NET 2. Since I''m using
the
.NET 4 version I had to change the application pool.
Last problem, which I couldn''t figure out yet is that now I get the
next
error:
unknown: No coercion operator is defined between types
''System.String''
and ''IronRuby.Builtins.MutableString''. (TypeError)
I took a look at the log and it seems like the problem is somewhere in this
method:
private object Rackup() {
Utils.Log("=> Loading Rack application");
var fullPath = Path.Combine(_appRoot, "config.ru");
if (File.Exists(fullPath)) {
return IronRubyEngine.ExecuteMethod<RubyArray>(
IronRubyEngine.Execute("Rack::Builder"),
"parse_file",
MutableString.CreateAscii(fullPath))[0];
}
return null;
}
Any ideas?
Thanks!
Shay.
--------------------------------------------------------
Shay Friedman | Microsoft Visual C#/IronRuby MVP | Author of IronRuby
Unleashed
Blog: http://IronShay.com | Twitter: http://twitter.com/ironshay
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Kevin Radcliffe
<kevin.radcliffe at gmail.com>wrote:
> Jimmy,
>
> As mentioned before, it appears (at least on my own Windows 7 x64 system)
> that add_acl (in lib\rack\deploy\iis.rb) was not giving FullControl rights
> to IIS_IUSRS as expected.
> This results in the "cannot read configuration file" that Ryan
reported
> above.
>
> I was able to get the system to give appropriate rights to IIS_IUSRS but in
> a very strange way:
>
> I had to give it 2 FileSystemAccessRules, one simpler one and the full one
> (that you already had in iis.rb)
> If I give it one or the other but not BOTH, it will add IIS_IUSRS as a user
> of the app directory, but will NOT give it any permissions at all.
>
> Here''s the gist with my minor edits (in case it is helpful).
> (again, this is from lib\rack\deploy\iis.rb):
>
> http://gist.github.com/467279
>
> Unfortunately, I''m not really sure WHY this is the case.
> It seems strange to be required to essentially add 2 rules that appear to
> do the same thing.
>
> Best Regards,
> Kevin Radcliffe
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20100720/cfbf5916/attachment.html>
Jimmy, What''s the status with some of the issues identified so far? Also, have you made it easier to switch between 1.0 and 1.1? Cheers, Ryan Riley -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20100731/9fb3a847/attachment.html>
First, thank you for doing what you''re doing. The sooner we can develop Rails 3 apps in IronRuby and deploy them to IIS without pain, the better! Especially since the pain level can be a deciding factor in whether to use Rails or ASP.NET MVC 2. That said, I''ve followed the instructions above. I have a Rails 2.3.5 app with Rack 1.0.1 that runs fine under webrick. rack2aspnet did what you suggested it would do. deploy2iis told me I needed Administrator privileges. Closed command window, reopened with administrator privileges. Ran again, did what you suggested it would do. In browser, I get error screen: Error: undefined method `parse_file'' for Rack::Builder:Class unknown: undefined method `parse_file'' for Rack::Builder:Class (NoMethodError) Search paths C:/workspace/jkt C:/IronRuby/lib/IronRuby C:/IronRuby/lib/ruby/1.8 C:/IronRuby/lib/ironruby/gems/1.8/gems/rack-1.0.1/bin C:/IronRuby/lib/ironruby/gems/1.8/gems/rack-1.0.1/lib C:/IronRuby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8 . Gem paths C:/IronRuby/lib/ironruby/gems/1.8 -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Hi all, First, thank you for all the effort put in this project. Is there any news on this particular project (ironruby-rack gem), going forward with the release 1.1.1? Eduardo -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
belstaff jackets http://www.belstaffjacketsoutlet.com/Belstaff-Man/ men belstaff jackets http://www.belstaffjacketsoutlet.com/Belstaff-Man/ belstaff sale http://www.belstaffjacketsoutlet.com/Belstaff-Man/ belstaff bags http://www.belstaffjacketsoutlet.com/Belstaff-Bag/ belstaff bag http://www.belstaffjacketsoutlet.com/Belstaff-Bag/ belstaff 554 http://www.belstaffjacketsoutlet.com/Belstaff-Bag/ women belstaff jackets http://ww.belstaffjacketsoutlet.com/Belstaff-Women/ belstaff jackets http://www.belstaffjacketsoutlet.com/Belstaff-Icon-Jackets/ Belstaff Icon Jackets http://www.belstaffjacketsoutlet.com/Belstaff-Icon-Jackets/ belstaff boots http://www.belstaffjacketsoutlet.com/Belstaff-Shoes/ belstaff http://www.belstaffjacketsoutlet.com/Belstaff-Women/ -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Hi all, IronRuby 1.1.2 is really working good... I was trying to see what is the status of this project, it seems to be no longer in the original path in github. Is there any news-updates on that? Is there any way to contribute to the project? Regards Eduardo Eduardo Blumenfeld wrote in post #958706:> Hi all, > > First, thank you for all the effort put in this project. > > Is there any news on this particular project (ironruby-rack gem), going > forward with the release 1.1.1? > > Eduardo-- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Eduardo Blumenfeld wrote in post #982472: Hi all, IronRuby 1.1.2 is working really good in production for wpf applications. Do you know the status of the IronRuby-Rack project? Is there any way to contribute? Eduardo -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Eduardo Blumenfeld <lists at ruby-forum.com> wrote:> IronRuby 1.1.2 is working really good in production for wpf > applications. > Do you know the status of the IronRuby-Rack project?Not much going on. Should at least make sure it''s rack-1.2.0 compatible.> Is there any way to contribute?If you want to submit patches, source is here: https://github.com/IronLanguages/main/tree/master/Hosts/IronRuby.Rack If you want to contribute blog-posts, tutorials, or documentation, send it to the mailing list and we''ll figure out where best to put it. ~Jimmy
I may also be interested in contributing to move IronRuby.Rack toward rack-1.2.0 compatibility. I would imagine (but this could be totally wrong) that we would want to move more tests over from: https://github.com/chneukirchen/rack/tree/master/test Would this be a good approach? Where would be a good place for them, here? https://github.com/IronLanguages/main/tree/master/Hosts/IronRuby.Rack/ironruby-rack/test (Or pehaps a subdirectory off of that) If it isn''t a good approach, what would be a better way to move toward 1.2.0 compatibility? Thanks! Best Regards, Kevin Radcliffe -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20110424/4a65aa66/attachment.html>
There are two important parts to testing IronRuby-Rack: First, we need to make sure IronRuby can run rack 1.2. This will be a subset of the tests as rack has tests for mongrel and thin, which we won''t be able to run, but the webrick test is fair game. The rack tests are checked into external/languages/ruby/tests, as we used to run rack tests against IronRuby in CI. So just updating those tests and running them should be all that''s required, and well see what bugs come out of that. Second we need to actually test IronRuby-Rack: given a HttpRequest it creates a valid rack request, runs the request, and then takes the rack response and makes into a HttpResponse. We should thoroughly make sure that''s unit tested, and the only way to do that is write the tests; the rack tests won''t really help. Currently there are some unit tests and a test similar to rack''s webrick test that use Cassini instead. For starters in testing the HttpRequest portion, we could give it a HttpRequest and run rack-lint to make sure it doesn''t fuck anything up. But ideally we''ll probably need tests exercising the entire rack spec. ~Jimmy On Apr 23, 2011, at 11:35 PM, Kevin Radcliffe <kevin.radcliffe at gmail.com> wrote:> I may also be interested in contributing to move IronRuby.Rack toward rack-1.2.0 compatibility. > > I would imagine (but this could be totally wrong) that we would want to move more tests over from: > https://github.com/chneukirchen/rack/tree/master/test > > Would this be a good approach? > Where would be a good place for them, here? > https://github.com/IronLanguages/main/tree/master/Hosts/IronRuby.Rack/ironruby-rack/test > (Or pehaps a subdirectory off of that) > > If it isn''t a good approach, what would be a better way to move toward 1.2.0 compatibility? > Thanks! > > Best Regards, > Kevin Radcliffe > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20110424/b8bc3fc0/attachment.html>