I know everyone is using IronRuby for their testing, but what about code coverage? Has anyone tried RCov with a .NET app? Ryan Riley Email: ryan.riley at panesofglass.org LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanriley Blog: http://wizardsofsmart.net/ Twitter: @panesofglass Website: http://panesofglass.org/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20100122/68e46b8f/attachment.html>
I think rcov is c-based ? JD From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Riley Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:12 AM To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org Subject: [Ironruby-core] RCov I know everyone is using IronRuby for their testing, but what about code coverage? Has anyone tried RCov with a .NET app? Ryan Riley Email: ryan.riley at panesofglass.org<mailto:ryan.riley at panesofglass.org> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanriley Blog: http://wizardsofsmart.net/ Twitter: @panesofglass Website: http://panesofglass.org/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20100122/acecfd42/attachment.html>
The core is C-based. Most of it is in Ruby. This is just similar to ruby-debug which also has a small C-based core. Both would need a small hook from IronRuby. So its certainly feasible to support it, but at this point, it will be post-1.0 However, you would only get coverage for Ruby code. For profiling .NET code, you have to use .NET profilers like the one in VS. From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jim Deville Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:34 AM To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] RCov I think rcov is c-based ? JD From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Riley Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:12 AM To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org Subject: [Ironruby-core] RCov I know everyone is using IronRuby for their testing, but what about code coverage? Has anyone tried RCov with a .NET app? Ryan Riley Email: ryan.riley at panesofglass.org<mailto:ryan.riley at panesofglass.org> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanriley Blog: http://wizardsofsmart.net/ Twitter: @panesofglass Website: http://panesofglass.org/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20100122/107771ee/attachment.html>
That''s what I thought. Thanks for the responses. Ryan Riley Email: ryan.riley at panesofglass.org LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanriley Blog: http://wizardsofsmart.net/ Twitter: @panesofglass Website: http://panesofglass.org/ On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Shri Borde <Shri.Borde at microsoft.com>wrote:> The core is C-based. Most of it is in Ruby. This is just similar to > ruby-debug which also has a small C-based core. Both would need a small hook > from IronRuby. So its certainly feasible to support it, but at this point, > it will be post-1.0 > > > > However, you would only get coverage for Ruby code. For profiling .NET > code, you have to use .NET profilers like the one in VS. > > > > *From:* ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto: > ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] *On Behalf Of *Jim Deville > *Sent:* Friday, January 22, 2010 10:34 AM > > *To:* ironruby-core at rubyforge.org > *Subject:* Re: [Ironruby-core] RCov > > > > I think rcov is c-based L > > > > JD > > > > *From:* ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto: > ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Riley > *Sent:* Friday, January 22, 2010 10:12 AM > *To:* ironruby-core at rubyforge.org > *Subject:* [Ironruby-core] RCov > > > > I know everyone is using IronRuby for their testing, but what about code > coverage? Has anyone tried RCov with a .NET app? > > > > > Ryan Riley > > Email: ryan.riley at panesofglass.org > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanriley > Blog: http://wizardsofsmart.net/ > Twitter: @panesofglass > Website: http://panesofglass.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20100122/dd8556ea/attachment-0001.html>
Just noticed that RCov can work in pure Ruby mode without the C-based core known as ?rcovrt?. The pure Ruby mode is two orders of magnitude slower. Just FYI. There is still the issue that it will not profile .NET code? From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Shri Borde Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:53 AM To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] RCov The core is C-based. Most of it is in Ruby. This is just similar to ruby-debug which also has a small C-based core. Both would need a small hook from IronRuby. So its certainly feasible to support it, but at this point, it will be post-1.0 However, you would only get coverage for Ruby code. For profiling .NET code, you have to use .NET profilers like the one in VS. From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jim Deville Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:34 AM To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] RCov I think rcov is c-based ? JD From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Riley Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:12 AM To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org Subject: [Ironruby-core] RCov I know everyone is using IronRuby for their testing, but what about code coverage? Has anyone tried RCov with a .NET app? Ryan Riley Email: ryan.riley at panesofglass.org<mailto:ryan.riley at panesofglass.org> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanriley Blog: http://wizardsofsmart.net/ Twitter: @panesofglass Website: http://panesofglass.org/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20100308/1deeb8ce/attachment.html>
Interesting to know though. Thanks for sharing! JD From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Shri Borde Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:14 AM To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] RCov Just noticed that RCov can work in pure Ruby mode without the C-based core known as ?rcovrt?. The pure Ruby mode is two orders of magnitude slower. Just FYI. There is still the issue that it will not profile .NET code? From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Shri Borde Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:53 AM To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] RCov The core is C-based. Most of it is in Ruby. This is just similar to ruby-debug which also has a small C-based core. Both would need a small hook from IronRuby. So its certainly feasible to support it, but at this point, it will be post-1.0 However, you would only get coverage for Ruby code. For profiling .NET code, you have to use .NET profilers like the one in VS. From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jim Deville Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:34 AM To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] RCov I think rcov is c-based ? JD From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Riley Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:12 AM To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org Subject: [Ironruby-core] RCov I know everyone is using IronRuby for their testing, but what about code coverage? Has anyone tried RCov with a .NET app? Ryan Riley Email: ryan.riley at panesofglass.org<mailto:ryan.riley at panesofglass.org> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanriley Blog: http://wizardsofsmart.net/ Twitter: @panesofglass Website: http://panesofglass.org/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20100308/3729b679/attachment-0001.html>
Any guesses what this code prints?
SCRIPT_LINES__ = {}
require "rubygems"
puts SCRIPT_LINES__.size
If you thought 0 like me, you are wrong. Its prints 31 with MRI. I was trying to
get IronRuby to work with rcov in the pure Ruby mode, and was completely baffled
why it was not working for IronRuby. Turns out SCRIPT_LINES__ is a magic
constant that contains the mapping from the names of all the loaded files to
their content. There is a comment about it in the IronRuby sources, but it is an
unimplemented feature. The pure-Ruby RCov mode depends on this, and so it does
not work with IronRuby.
From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at
rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jim Deville
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:25 AM
To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] RCov
Interesting to know though. Thanks for sharing!
JD
From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at
rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Shri Borde
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:14 AM
To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] RCov
Just noticed that RCov can work in pure Ruby mode without the C-based core known
as ?rcovrt?. The pure Ruby mode is two orders of magnitude slower. Just FYI.
There is still the issue that it will not profile .NET code?
From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at
rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Shri Borde
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:53 AM
To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] RCov
The core is C-based. Most of it is in Ruby. This is just similar to ruby-debug
which also has a small C-based core. Both would need a small hook from IronRuby.
So its certainly feasible to support it, but at this point, it will be post-1.0
However, you would only get coverage for Ruby code. For profiling .NET code, you
have to use .NET profilers like the one in VS.
From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at
rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jim Deville
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:34 AM
To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] RCov
I think rcov is c-based ?
JD
From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at
rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Riley
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:12 AM
To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
Subject: [Ironruby-core] RCov
I know everyone is using IronRuby for their testing, but what about code
coverage? Has anyone tried RCov with a .NET app?
Ryan Riley
Email: ryan.riley at panesofglass.org<mailto:ryan.riley at
panesofglass.org>
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanriley
Blog: http://wizardsofsmart.net/
Twitter: @panesofglass
Website: http://panesofglass.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20100311/8b1c946f/attachment.html>