M. David Peterson
2008-Jan-02 08:24 UTC
[Ironruby-core] Ruby.NET vs. IronRuby: Overview Posted to O''ReilyNet/Windows DevCenter
FYI... This post is *LONG* overdue, but later is better than never. :D http://www.oreillynet.com/windows/blog/2008/01/rubynet_vs_ironruby_whats_the.html Please don''t hesitate to correct anything that needs correcting via a follow-up comment to the above post or inline to this thread. Thanks! -- /M:D M. David Peterson Co-Founder & Chief Architect, 3rd&Urban, LLC Email: m.david at 3rdandUrban.com | m.david at amp.fm | Mobile: (206) 418-9027 http://3rdandUrban.com/ | http://amp.fm/ | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354/
Sanghyeon Seo
2008-Jan-02 09:12 UTC
[Ironruby-core] Ruby.NET vs. IronRuby: Overview Posted to O''ReilyNet/Windows DevCenter
2008/1/2, M. David Peterson <m.david at xmlhacker.com>: http://www.oreillynet.com/windows/blog/2008/01/rubynet_vs_ironruby_whats_the.html You wrote: What about support for Ruby on Rails?>From the Ruby.NET side there are only a handful of obstacles left to overcome...This is not my impression. For example, there needs to be an implementation of Socket. And Mutex. And another "same name" issue, i.e. thread.rb and thread.so. And who know what. Not to mention ADO.NET backend to ActiveRecord (like ActiveRecord-JDBC) and other niceties. By the way, I think a lot of Ruby and .NET integration can be developed right now, without waiting for IronRuby or Ruby.NET, by using RubyCLR which has no compatibility problems. -- Seo Sanghyeon
John Lam (DLR)
2008-Jan-02 16:17 UTC
[Ironruby-core] Ruby.NET vs. IronRuby: Overview Posted to O''ReilyNet/Windows DevCenter
M. David Peterson:> > FYI... This post is *LONG* overdue, but later is better than never. :D > > http://www.oreillynet.com/windows/blog/2008/01/rubynet_vs_ironruby_what > s_the.html > > Please don''t hesitate to correct anything that needs correcting via a > follow-up comment to the above post or inline to this thread. > > Thanks!Thanks for the write-up, David! I posted a response on my blog: http://www.iunknown.com/2008/01/ironruby-vs-rub.html since I really do need an excuse to blog these days :) T-John
M. David Peterson
2008-Jan-02 17:37 UTC
[Ironruby-core] Ruby.NET vs. IronRuby: Overview Posted to O''ReilyNet/Windows DevCenter
On 1/2/08, John Lam (DLR) <jflam at microsoft.com> wrote:>> I posted a response on my blog: >> http://www.iunknown.com/2008/01/ironruby-vs-rub.htmlThanks! I''ve updated the post and integrated your comments inline to the post where applicable.>> since I really do need an excuse to blog these days :)Oh, I''m sure you''ve just got just oodles of time on your hands these days, huh?! ;-) Well, since you''re obviously looking for things to do with the extra seven seconds you have each week to work on "side" projects ;-), before I forget> http://ironruby.net still points to the GoDaddy default parked pagewhere as http://www.ironruby.net properly points to your server. Not a huge thing, but seems worth pointing out. Hope your Holidays were great, John! -- /M:D M. David Peterson Co-Founder & Chief Architect, 3rd&Urban, LLC Email: m.david at 3rdandUrban.com | m.david at amp.fm | Mobile: (206) 418-9027 http://3rdandUrban.com | http://amp.fm | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354