Hi Everyone, I have a copy of the IronRuby contributor''s agreement ready for folks to look at: http://www.ironruby.net/contributor.pdf We''re in the process of getting turning the crank on getting the electronic signature tool spun up for collecting signed agreements. So don''t bother signing / FAX / mailing this document in. I hope that by the end of today or early next week that you should just be able to electronically sign the doc. Comments / questions? Thanks, -John -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20070907/f00fbc20/attachment.html
John Lam (CLR) wrote:> Hi Everyone, > > > > I have a copy of the IronRuby contributor?s agreement ready for folks to > look at: http://www.ironruby.net/contributor.pdfI noticed it has a "REVIEW" watermark as well as "Microsoft Confidential" at the bottom. I assume those should be removed... - Charlie
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:17:01 -0600, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter at sun.com> wrote:> I noticed it has a "REVIEW" watermark as well as "Microsoft > Confidential" at the bottom. I assume those should be removed...I kind of like ''em. Give things a sense of "we''re not supposed to be showing you this" rebellion. ;-) My vote: Keep ''em both and add another line at the very bottom of the second page in 6pt sub-script that states "I can''t believe we''re actually going through with this. ~Bill G." -- /M:D M. David Peterson http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 | http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155
> My vote: Keep ''em both and add another line at the very bottom of the > second page in 6pt sub-script that states "I can''t believe we''re actually > going through with this. ~Bill G.":) I put up that doc as-is since folks signing the agreement will do so via some kind of web site (details to come). I''ll take it down once we have the right mechanisms in place. -John