Rich
Of course, if you just run your own personal Wiki tightly bound to 
localhost, running rhtml would not be as terrible an idea as it may 
sound in a multi-user configuration (to add to Assaph''s point, if your 
server that ran Instiki with rhtml enabled sat behind a firewall, 
anyone with Ruby network programming experience could use it to poke 
around behind your firewall, connecting as the Instiki server).
I have not investigated, but if it were easily possible to enable rhtml 
in this manner for a personal Wiki, I''d still like to know how, 
consequences be damned.  Anyone?
Tam?s
On Oct 14, 2005, at 12:51 PM, Rich Morin wrote:
At 2:42 AM +1000 10/15/05, Assaph Mehr wrote:> Is there a reason why allowing rhtml (perhaps as an option)
> would be a Bad Idea?
>
> It would be an extremely bad idea, as it will allow users ...
Point taken.  Obviously, I''m not paranoid enough!
-r
-- 
email: rdm at cfcl.com; phone: +1 650-873-7841
http://www.cfcl.com        - Canta Forda Computer Laboratory
http://www.cfcl.com/Meta   - The FreeBSD Browser, Meta Project, etc.
_______________________________________________
Instiki-users mailing list
Instiki-users at rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/instiki-users