Hi Thomas, On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:43:28AM +0200, Thomas B. Ruecker wrote:> Do players support https?obviously not. But the implementation of SSL in a player isn't that hard. In a matter of fact, SSL isn't the best solution for a public stream, but I want to use it for a private stream, where every user has the knowledge how to use a player with ssl. :-)> You could simply set up a ssl "tunnel".Also a good answer, but in my mind every user have to setup a SSL "tunnel" to the endpoint, wich isn't so comfortable. ;-) Greetings Frederic Jaeckel -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCM d- s+: a-- C+++ UL+++ P+ L++ E--- W+ N o+ K w-- O+ M V- PS+++ PE+++ Y PGP+ t 5 X R tv++ b++ DI++ D+ G e h! r y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast/attachments/20060815/e5d1d19a/attachment.pgp
Frederic `jchome` Jaeckel wrote:> Hi Thomas, > On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:43:28AM +0200, Thomas B. Ruecker wrote: > >> Do players support https? >> > obviously not. But the implementation of SSL in a player isn't that > hard. In a matter of fact, SSL isn't the best solution for a public > stream, but I want to use it for a private stream, where every user has > the knowledge how to use a player with ssl. :-) > > >> You could simply set up a ssl "tunnel". >> > > Also a good answer, but in my mind every user have to setup a SSL > "tunnel" to the endpoint, wich isn't so comfortable. ;-) >I was thinking about a socket accepting ssl connections and forwarding them decrypted to a port on the local (server) machine. I know there are simple solutions for this. Pound would be a rather bloated one If I'd have to choose. Cheers Thomas
Hi, On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 11:04:12AM +0200, Thomas B. Ruecker wrote:> I was thinking about a socket accepting ssl connections and forwarding > them decrypted to a port on the local (server) machine. I know there are > simple solutions for this. Pound would be a rather bloated one If I'd > have to choose.yes, of course.. I'd searched a bit and found out that a simple https proxy does the job. But I also have a need of a load balancer, so pound isn't much oversized. :-) Greetings Frederic Jaeckel -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCM d- s+: a-- C+++ UL+++ P+ L++ E--- W+ N o+ K w-- O+ M V- PS+++ PE+++ Y PGP+ t 5 X R tv++ b++ DI++ D+ G e h! r y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast/attachments/20060815/dd934544/attachment.pgp