Icecast - Aug 2004 - Problem with streaming some mp3s (but not all)

So there is no way around having to re-encode them
all?

--Pritpaul

--- Geoff Shang <gshang@uq.net.au> wrote:
> Hi:
> 
> My guess is that ices can't handle 16000 or 32000hz
> sampling rates.  The
> 32kbps file is 22050hz and the 80kbps file is
> 32000hz.  I couldn't get
> mpg123 to play test2 remotely, but lame defaults to
> 32000hz with 40kbps
> mono and 16000hz with 40kbps stereo, so I'm guessing
> this is the problem.
> You can either use --resample to force a different
> sampling rate or pick a
> different bitrate.
> 
> Geoff.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Geoff Shang <gshang@uq.net.au>
> ICQ number 43634701
> 
> Make sure your E-mail can be read by everyone!
> http://www.betips.net/etc/evilmail.html
> 
> Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint
> attachments.
> See
>
http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
> 
> 
> 
<p>__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
http://search.yahoo.com
--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
'icecast-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is
needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.

On Sun, 20 Apr 2003, Pritpaul Mahal wrote:
> So there is no way around having to re-encode them
> all?
Well, assuming my diagnosis is correct, it would appear not, at least for
now.  You could of course get ices to send them out without re-encoding,
thereby avoiding the decode/recode step, but all your files would have to
be the one format and of course this would be the format that people
received.  I would personally count the inability to handle 32000hz as a
bug, and if Brendan does too, there's every likelyhood that it'll get
fixed
in time.

Geoff.

<p>--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
'icecast-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is
needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.

I'm no expert at C, but from what I can tell from the
ices source it seems to be designed to handle any of
the defined frequencies... now whether theres a bug in
the actual handling, I don't know.

How can I get ices to skip the decode/recode step?

Thanks again!

--Pritpaul

<p>--- Geoff Shang <gshang@uq.net.au> wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Apr 2003, Pritpaul Mahal wrote:
> 
> > So there is no way around having to re-encode them
> > all?
> 
> Well, assuming my diagnosis is correct, it would
> appear not, at least for
> now.  You could of course get ices to send them out
> without re-encoding,
> thereby avoiding the decode/recode step, but all
> your files would have to
> be the one format and of course this would be the
> format that people
> received.  I would personally count the inability to
> handle 32000hz as a
> bug, and if Brendan does too, there's every
> likelyhood that it'll get fixed
> in time.
> 
> Geoff.
> 
> 
<p>__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
http://search.yahoo.com
--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
'icecast-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is
needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.