I notice two versions on the Web site, 0.2.2 being shown as developmental. I'm building a new server that will run Icecast 1.3.11 and I'm wondering how stable Ices 0.2.2 is? Are there enough fixes in it that it's worth using it? Thanks, Hunter --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
Hunter Hillegas:> I notice two versions on the Web site, 0.2.2 being shown as developmental. > > I'm building a new server that will run Icecast 1.3.11 and I'm wondering how > stable Ices 0.2.2 is? Are there enough fixes in it that it's worth using it?yes. it runs fine. also with re-encoding (lame 3.89) best, u. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
Normally i would not run a devel package , but in this case with ices, yes, they solved alot of compatability issues , etc. when using ices 0.0.1 i was getting segmentation faults, or stream errors and it would die after 2 hours, with ices 0.2.2 , i have yet to see a error , OS : i am running Slackware/2.2.19 , been running my stream now for over 30 days , problem free, Peace ----- Original Message ----- From: Hunter Hillegas <lists@lastonepicked.com> To: <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 3:40 PM Subject: [icecast] Ices> I notice two versions on the Web site, 0.2.2 being shown as developmental. > > I'm building a new server that will run Icecast 1.3.11 and I'm wonderinghow> stable Ices 0.2.2 is? Are there enough fixes in it that it's worth usingit?> > Thanks, > Hunter > > > --- >8 ---- > List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ > icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ > To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to'icecast-request@xiph.org'> containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. > Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered. >--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
> I'm building a new server that will run Icecast 1.3.11 and I'm wondering how > stable Ices 0.2.2 is? Are there enough fixes in it that it's worth using it?I wouldn't run anything but the current code. Brendan is pretty good about fixing bugs if you run into any. A few people have been using 0.2.2 for a while. jack. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
>> stable Ices 0.2.2 is? Are there enough fixes in it that it's worth using it? > > I wouldn't run anything but the current code. Brendan is pretty > good about fixing bugs if you run into any. A few people have been > using 0.2.2 for a while.Does ices 0.2.2 show the album name in the meta information, or just the artist & songname? Thanks, Mark --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.