RedHat 6.0 originally, with upgraded glibc. I just checked the machine again and I was off on the versions. glibc-2.1.3-22 glib-1.2.3-1 glibc-devel-2.1.3-22 Still, pretty similar. As far as I know, those are most recent for RH6. Upgrading the server to 7.x is not exactly easy since it's in co-lo 3 hours away. Plus, until now, I don't think anyone knew Icecast may be effected by this stuff. Hunter> From: Jack Moffitt <jack@xiph.org> > Reply-To: icecast@xiph.org > Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 10:23:33 -0600 > To: icecast@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [icecast] Sacrilege, but... > > Glibcs are identical. Is this redhat? Mandrake? > > What version of Redhat (that's my guess from the package names :) > > i have RH7.0 with glibcs of 2.2.2-10 > > You guys _do_ install errata right? > > jack.--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
> Still, pretty similar. As far as I know, those are most recent for RH6. > Upgrading the server to 7.x is not exactly easy since it's in co-lo 3 hours > away. Plus, until now, I don't think anyone knew Icecast may be effected by > this stuff.I understand an upgrade is not warranted in that situation, especially if we don't know if this is really the problem or not. Do you have another box (preferably with RH7 or 7.1) to test with? jack. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
Unfortunately not at this point. Moving back to 1.3.0 "fixed" the problem and that was the last time I spent any real time on it.> From: Jack Moffitt <jack@xiph.org> > Reply-To: icecast@xiph.org > Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 10:36:03 -0600 > To: icecast@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [icecast] Sacrilege, but... > >> Still, pretty similar. As far as I know, those are most recent for RH6. >> Upgrading the server to 7.x is not exactly easy since it's in co-lo 3 hours >> away. Plus, until now, I don't think anyone knew Icecast may be effected by >> this stuff. > > I understand an upgrade is not warranted in that situation, especially > if we don't know if this is really the problem or not. Do you have > another box (preferably with RH7 or 7.1) to test with? > > jack. > > --- >8 ---- > List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ > icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ > To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' > containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. > Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered. >--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.