Klaas Jan Wierenga
2005-Sep-05 14:58 UTC
[Icecast-dev] relationship kh-branch and icecast-trunk
Hi all, I'm thinking about using the kh-branch because I would really like to use the slave_redirect feature in the kh branch for load-balancing. I read this feature won't make it into the 2.3 release, but is it likely to end up in the 2.4 release. In other words: if I decide to use the kh-branch now, is a smooth migration back to the icecast-2.4 release likely once that becomes available? Cheers, KJ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.18/90 - Release Date: 5-9-2005
On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 22:57, Klaas Jan Wierenga wrote:> Hi all, > > I'm thinking about using the kh-branch because I would really like to use > the slave_redirect feature in the kh branch for load-balancing. I read this > feature won't make it into the 2.3 release, but is it likely to end up in > the 2.4 release. In other words: if I decide to use the kh-branch now, is a > smooth migration back to the icecast-2.4 release likely once that becomes > available?The mechanism was really a simple test mechanism that works reasonably well but needs some more work before going into trunk. Whether any config changes would need to be done has certainly not been decided, and may depend on other factors, like whether the authentication mechanism will be extended to include this. What is likely is that whatever the mechanism, it will be best to have both the master and slave(s) at the same version. I should imagine what I have now will stay but there may be extra settings needed in later versions. karl.