Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan
2019-Mar-04 15:01 UTC
[Gluster-users] GlusterFS - 6.0RC - Test days (27th, 28th Feb)
Thanks to those who participated. Update at present: We found 3 blocker bugs in upgrade scenarios, and hence have marked release as pending upon them. We will keep these lists updated about progress. -Amar On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:41 PM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan < atumball at redhat.com> wrote:> Hi all, > > We are calling out our users, and developers to contribute in validating > ?glusterfs-6.0rc? build in their usecase. Specially for the cases of > upgrade, stability, and performance. > > Some of the key highlights of the release are listed in release-notes > draft > <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/release-6/doc/release-notes/6.0.md>. > Please note that there are some of the features which are being dropped out > of this release, and hence making sure your setup is not going to have an > issue is critical. Also the default lru-limit option in fuse mount for > Inodes should help to control the memory usage of client processes. All the > good reason to give it a shot in your test setup. > > If you are developer using gfapi interface to integrate with other > projects, you also have some signature changes, so please make sure your > project would work with latest release. Or even if you are using a project > which depends on gfapi, report the error with new RPMs (if any). We will > help fix it. > > As part of test days, we want to focus on testing the latest upcoming > release i.e. GlusterFS-6, and one or the other gluster volunteers would be > there on #gluster channel on freenode to assist the people. Some of the key > things we are looking as bug reports are: > > - > > See if upgrade from your current version to 6.0rc is smooth, and works > as documented. > - Report bugs in process, or in documentation if you find mismatch. > - > > Functionality is all as expected for your usecase. > - No issues with actual application you would run on production etc. > - > > Performance has not degraded in your usecase. > - While we have added some performance options to the code, not all of > them are turned on, as they have to be done based on usecases. > - Make sure the default setup is at least same as your current > version > - Try out few options mentioned in release notes (especially, > --auto-invalidation=no) and see if it helps performance. > - > > While doing all the above, check below: > - see if the log files are making sense, and not flooding with some > ?for developer only? type of messages. > - get ?profile info? output from old and now, and see if there is > anything which is out of normal expectation. Check with us on the numbers. > - get a ?statedump? when there are some issues. Try to make sense > of it, and raise a bug if you don?t understand it completely. > > > <https://hackmd.io/YB60uRCMQRC90xhNt4r6gA?both#Process-expected-on-test-days>Process > expected on test days. > > - > > We have a tracker bug > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-6.0>[0] > - We will attach all the ?blocker? bugs to this bug. > - > > Use this link to report bugs, so that we have more metadata around > given bugzilla. > - Click Here > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?blocked=1672818&bug_severity=high&component=core&priority=high&product=GlusterFS&status_whiteboard=gluster-test-day&version=6> > [1] > - > > The test cases which are to be tested are listed here in this sheet > <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1AS-tDiJmAr9skK535MbLJGe_RfqDQ3j1abX1wtjwpL4/edit?usp=sharing>[2], > please add, update, and keep it up-to-date to reduce duplicate efforts. > > Lets together make this release a success. > > Also check if we covered some of the open issues from Weekly untriaged > bugs > <https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2019-February/055874.html> > [3] > > For details on build and RPMs check this email > <https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2019-February/055875.html> > [4] > > Finally, the dates :-) > > - Wednesday - Feb 27th, and > - Thursday - Feb 28th > > Note that our goal is to identify as many issues as possible in upgrade > and stability scenarios, and if any blockers are found, want to make sure > we release with the fix for same. So each of you, Gluster users, feel > comfortable to upgrade to 6.0 version. > > Regards, > Gluster Ants. > > -- > Amar Tumballi (amarts) >-- Amar Tumballi (amarts) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20190304/c5c1e510/attachment.html>
Atin Mukherjee
2019-Mar-04 15:08 UTC
[Gluster-users] [Gluster-Maintainers] GlusterFS - 6.0RC - Test days (27th, 28th Feb)
On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 at 20:33, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan <atumball at redhat.com> wrote:> Thanks to those who participated. > > Update at present: > > We found 3 blocker bugs in upgrade scenarios, and hence have marked release > as pending upon them. We will keep these lists updated about progress.I?d like to clarify that upgrade testing is blocked. So just fixing these test blocker(s) isn?t enough to call release-6 green. We need to continue and finish the rest of the upgrade tests once the respective bugs are fixed.> > -Amar > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:41 PM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan < > atumball at redhat.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > We are calling out our users, and developers to contribute in validating > > ?glusterfs-6.0rc? build in their usecase. Specially for the cases of > > upgrade, stability, and performance. > > > > Some of the key highlights of the release are listed in release-notes > > draft > > < > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/release-6/doc/release-notes/6.0.md > >. > > Please note that there are some of the features which are being dropped > out > > of this release, and hence making sure your setup is not going to have an > > issue is critical. Also the default lru-limit option in fuse mount for > > Inodes should help to control the memory usage of client processes. All > the > > good reason to give it a shot in your test setup. > > > > If you are developer using gfapi interface to integrate with other > > projects, you also have some signature changes, so please make sure your > > project would work with latest release. Or even if you are using a > project > > which depends on gfapi, report the error with new RPMs (if any). We will > > help fix it. > > > > As part of test days, we want to focus on testing the latest upcoming > > release i.e. GlusterFS-6, and one or the other gluster volunteers would > be > > there on #gluster channel on freenode to assist the people. Some of the > key > > things we are looking as bug reports are: > > > > - > > > > See if upgrade from your current version to 6.0rc is smooth, and works > > as documented. > > - Report bugs in process, or in documentation if you find mismatch. > > - > > > > Functionality is all as expected for your usecase. > > - No issues with actual application you would run on production etc. > > - > > > > Performance has not degraded in your usecase. > > - While we have added some performance options to the code, not all of > > them are turned on, as they have to be done based on usecases. > > - Make sure the default setup is at least same as your current > > version > > - Try out few options mentioned in release notes (especially, > > --auto-invalidation=no) and see if it helps performance. > > - > > > > While doing all the above, check below: > > - see if the log files are making sense, and not flooding with some > > ?for developer only? type of messages. > > - get ?profile info? output from old and now, and see if there is > > anything which is out of normal expectation. Check with us on the > numbers. > > - get a ?statedump? when there are some issues. Try to make sense > > of it, and raise a bug if you don?t understand it completely. > > > > > > < > https://hackmd.io/YB60uRCMQRC90xhNt4r6gA?both#Process-expected-on-test-days > >Process > > expected on test days. > > > > - > > > > We have a tracker bug > > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-6.0>[0] > > - We will attach all the ?blocker? bugs to this bug. > > - > > > > Use this link to report bugs, so that we have more metadata around > > given bugzilla. > > - Click Here > > < > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?blocked=1672818&bug_severity=high&component=core&priority=high&product=GlusterFS&status_whiteboard=gluster-test-day&version=6 > > > > [1] > > - > > > > The test cases which are to be tested are listed here in this sheet > > < > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1AS-tDiJmAr9skK535MbLJGe_RfqDQ3j1abX1wtjwpL4/edit?usp=sharing > >[2], > > please add, update, and keep it up-to-date to reduce duplicate efforts-- - Atin (atinm) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20190304/17567fcf/attachment.html>