GlusterD2 is not yet called out for standalone deployments. You can happily update to glusterfs-5.x (recommend you to wait for glusterfs-5.4 which is already tagged, and waiting for packages to be built). Regards, Amar On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 4:46 PM ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi, > > Could you please update on this and also let us know what is GlusterD2 > (as it is under development in 5.0 release), so it is ok to uplift to 5.0? > > Regards, > Abhishek > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 5:47 PM ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Currently we are using Glusterfs 3.7.6 and thinking to switch on >> Glusterfs 4.1 or 5.0, when I see there are too much code changes between >> these version, could you please let us know, is there any compatibility >> issue when we uplift any of the new mentioned version? >> >> Regards >> Abhishek >> > > > -- > > > > > Regards > Abhishek Paliwal > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users-- Amar Tumballi (amarts) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20190227/8818d6d8/attachment.html>
Hi Amar, sorry to jump into this thread with an connected question. When installing via "apt-get" and so using debian packages and also systemd to start/stop glusterd is the online upgrade process from 3.x/4.x to 5.x still needed as described at https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Upgrade-Guide/upgrade_to_4.1/ ? Especially because there is manual killall and such for processes handled by systemd in my case. Or is there an other upgrade guide or recommendations for use on ubuntu? Would systemctl stop glusterd, then using apt-get update with changes sources and a reboot be enough? Ingo Am 27.02.19 um 16:11 schrieb Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan:> GlusterD2 is not yet called out for standalone deployments. > > You can happily update to glusterfs-5.x (recommend you to wait for > glusterfs-5.4 which is already tagged, and waiting for packages to be > built). > > Regards, > Amar > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 4:46 PM ABHISHEK PALIWAL > <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com <mailto:abhishpaliwal at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi, > > Could? you please update on this and also let us know what is > GlusterD2 (as it is under development in 5.0 release), so it is ok > to uplift to 5.0? > > Regards, > Abhishek > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 5:47 PM ABHISHEK PALIWAL > <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com <mailto:abhishpaliwal at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi, > > Currently we are using Glusterfs 3.7.6 and thinking to switch on > Glusterfs 4.1 or 5.0, when I see there are too much code changes > between these version, could you please let us know, is there > any compatibility issue when we uplift any of the new mentioned > version?? > > Regards > Abhishek > > > > -- > > > > > Regards > Abhishek Paliwal > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > > > -- > Amar Tumballi (amarts) > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >
I am trying to build Gluster5.4 but getting below error at the time of configure conftest.c:11:28: fatal error: ac_nonexistent.h: No such file or directory Could you please help me what is the reason of the above error. Regards, Abhishek On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 8:42 PM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan < atumball at redhat.com> wrote:> GlusterD2 is not yet called out for standalone deployments. > > You can happily update to glusterfs-5.x (recommend you to wait for > glusterfs-5.4 which is already tagged, and waiting for packages to be > built). > > Regards, > Amar > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 4:46 PM ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Could you please update on this and also let us know what is GlusterD2 >> (as it is under development in 5.0 release), so it is ok to uplift to 5.0? >> >> Regards, >> Abhishek >> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 5:47 PM ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Currently we are using Glusterfs 3.7.6 and thinking to switch on >>> Glusterfs 4.1 or 5.0, when I see there are too much code changes between >>> these version, could you please let us know, is there any compatibility >>> issue when we uplift any of the new mentioned version? >>> >>> Regards >>> Abhishek >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> >> Regards >> Abhishek Paliwal >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-users mailing list >> Gluster-users at gluster.org >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > > > -- > Amar Tumballi (amarts) >-- Regards Abhishek Paliwal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20190228/690106c0/attachment.html>