Jeevan Patnaik
2018-Oct-30 15:04 UTC
[Gluster-users] Should I be using gluster 3 or gluster 4?
Hi All, I see gluster 3 has reached end of life and gluster 5 has just been introduced. Is gluster 4.1.5 stable enough for production deployment? I see by default gluster docs point to v3 only and there are no gluster docs for 4 or 5. Why so? And I'm mainly looking for a stable gluster tiering feature and Kernek NFS support. I faced few issues with tiering in 3.14 and so thinking if I should switch to 4.1.5, as it will be a production deployment. Thank you. Regards, Jeevan. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20181030/401041b7/attachment.html>
Vlad Kopylov
2018-Oct-31 04:06 UTC
[Gluster-users] Should I be using gluster 3 or gluster 4?
3.12.14 working fine in production for file access you can find vol and mount settings in mailing list archive On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:05 AM Jeevan Patnaik <g1patnaik at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi All, > > I see gluster 3 has reached end of life and gluster 5 has just been > introduced. > > Is gluster 4.1.5 stable enough for production deployment? I see by default > gluster docs point to v3 only and there are no gluster docs for 4 or > 5. Why so? And I'm mainly looking for a stable gluster tiering feature and > Kernek NFS support. I faced few issues with tiering in 3.14 and so thinking > if I should switch to 4.1.5, as it will be a production deployment. > > Thank you. > > Regards, > Jeevan. > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20181031/0904c185/attachment.html>