Richard Neuboeck
2018-Sep-21 07:14 UTC
[Gluster-users] gluster connection interrupted during transfer
Hi again, in my limited - non full time programmer - understanding it's a memory leak in the gluster fuse client. Should I reopen the mentioned bugreport or open a new one? Or would the community prefer an entirely different approach? Thanks Richard On 13.09.18 10:07, Richard Neuboeck wrote:> Hi, > > I've created excerpts from the brick and client logs +/- 1 minute to > the kill event. Still the logs are ~400-500MB so will put them > somewhere to download since I have no idea what I should be looking > for and skimming them didn't reveal obvious problems to me. > > http://www.tbi.univie.ac.at/~hawk/gluster/brick_3min_excerpt.log > http://www.tbi.univie.ac.at/~hawk/gluster/mnt_3min_excerpt.log > > I was pointed in the direction of the following Bugreport > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613512 > It sounds right but seems to have been addressed already. > > If there is anything I can do to help solve this problem please let > me know. Thanks for your help! > > Cheers > Richard > > > On 9/11/18 10:10 AM, Richard Neuboeck wrote: >> Hi, >> >> since I feared that the logs would fill up the partition (again) I >> checked the systems daily and finally found the reason. The glusterfs >> process on the client runs out of memory and get's killed by OOM after >> about four days. Since rsync runs for a couple of days longer till it >> ends I never checked the whole time frame in the system logs and never >> stumbled upon the OOM message. >> >> Running out of memory on a 128GB RAM system even with a DB occupying >> ~40% of that is kind of strange though. Might there be a leak? >> >> But this would explain the erratic behavior I've experienced over the >> last 1.5 years while trying to work with our homes on glusterfs. >> >> Here is the kernel log message for the killed glusterfs process. >> https://gist.github.com/bleuchien/3d2b87985ecb944c60347d5e8660e36a >> >> I'm checking the brick and client trace logs. But those are respectively >> 1TB and 2TB in size so searching in them takes a while. I'll be creating >> gists for both logs about the time when the process died. >> >> As soon as I have more details I'll post them. >> >> Here you can see a graphical representation of the memory usage of this >> system: https://imgur.com/a/4BINtfr >> >> Cheers >> Richard >> >> >> >> On 31.08.18 08:13, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Richard Neuboeck >>> <hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at>> wrote: >>> >>> On 08/31/2018 03:50 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: >>> > +Mohit. +Milind >>> > >>> > @Mohit/Milind, >>> > >>> > Can you check logs and see whether you can find anything relevant? >>> >>> From glances at the system logs nothing out of the ordinary >>> occurred. However I'll start another rsync and take a closer look. >>> It will take a few days. >>> >>> > >>> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 7:04 PM, Richard Neuboeck >>> > <hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at> >>> <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at>>> wrote: >>> > >>> >? ? ?Hi, >>> > >>> >? ? ?I'm attaching a shortened version since the whole is about 5.8GB of >>> >? ? ?the client mount log. It includes the initial mount messages and the >>> >? ? ?last two minutes of log entries. >>> > >>> >? ? ?It ends very anticlimactic without an obvious error. Is there >>> >? ? ?anything specific I should be looking for? >>> > >>> > >>> > Normally I look logs around disconnect msgs to find out the reason. >>> > But as you said, sometimes one can see just disconnect msgs without >>> > any reason. That normally points to reason for disconnect in the >>> > network rather than a Glusterfs initiated disconnect. >>> >>> The rsync source is serving our homes currently so there are NFS >>> connections 24/7. There don't seem to be any network related >>> interruptions >>> >>> >>> Can you set diagnostics.client-log-level and diagnostics.brick-log-level >>> to TRACE and check logs of both ends of connections - client and brick? >>> To reduce the logsize, I would suggest to logrotate existing logs and >>> start with fresh logs when you are about to start so that only relevant >>> logs are captured. Also, can you take strace of client and brick process >>> using: >>> >>> strace -o <outputfile> -ff -v -p <pid> >>> >>> attach both logs and strace. Let's trace through what syscalls on socket >>> return and then decide whether to inspect tcpdump or not. If you don't >>> want to repeat tests again, please capture tcpdump too (on both ends of >>> connection) and send them to us. >>> >>> >>> - a co-worker would be here faster than I could check >>> the logs if the connection to home would be broken ;-) >>> The three gluster machines are due to this problem reduced to only >>> testing so there is nothing else running. >>> >>> >>> > >>> >? ? ?Cheers >>> >? ? ?Richard >>> > >>> >? ? ?On 08/30/2018 02:40 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: >>> >? ? ?> Normally client logs will give a clue on why the disconnections are >>> >? ? ?> happening (ping-timeout, wrong port etc). Can you look into client >>> >? ? ?> logs to figure out what's happening? If you can't find anything, can >>> >? ? ?> you send across client logs? >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 6:11 PM, Richard Neuboeck >>> >? ? ?> <hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at> >>> <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at>> >>> >? ? ?<mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at> >>> <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at>>>> >>> >? ? ?wrote: >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?Hi Gluster Community, >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?I have problems with a glusterfs 'Transport endpoint not >>> >? ? ?connected' >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?connection abort during file transfers that I can >>> >? ? ?replicate (all the >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?time now) but not pinpoint as to why this is happening. >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?The volume is set up in replica 3 mode and accessed with >>> >? ? ?the fuse >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?gluster client. Both client and server are running CentOS >>> >? ? ?and the >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?supplied 3.12.11 version of gluster. >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?The connection abort happens at different times during >>> >? ? ?rsync but >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?occurs every time I try to sync all our files (1.1TB) to >>> >? ? ?the empty >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?volume. >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?Client and server side I don't find errors in the gluster >>> >? ? ?log files. >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?rsync logs the obvious transfer problem. The only log that >>> >? ? ?shows >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?anything related is the server brick log which states >>> that the >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?connection is shutting down: >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?[2018-08-18 22:40:35.502510] I [MSGID: 115036] >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?[server.c:527:server_rpc_notify] 0-home-server: >>> disconnecting >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?connection from >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?brax-110405-2018/08/16-08:36:28:575972-home-client-0-0-0 >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?[2018-08-18 22:40:35.502620] W >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?[inodelk.c:499:pl_inodelk_log_cleanup] 0-home-server: >>> >? ? ?releasing lock >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?on eaeb0398-fefd-486d-84a7-f13744d1cf10 held by >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?{client=0x7f83ec0b3ce0, pid=110423 >>> lk-owner=d0fd5ffb427f0000} >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?[2018-08-18 22:40:35.502692] W >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?[entrylk.c:864:pl_entrylk_log_cleanup] 0-home-server: >>> >? ? ?releasing lock >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?on faa93f7b-6c46-4251-b2b2-abcd2f2613e1 held by >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?{client=0x7f83ec0b3ce0, pid=110423 >>> lk-owner=703dd4cc407f0000} >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?[2018-08-18 22:40:35.502719] W >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?[entrylk.c:864:pl_entrylk_log_cleanup] 0-home-server: >>> >? ? ?releasing lock >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?on faa93f7b-6c46-4251-b2b2-abcd2f2613e1 held by >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?{client=0x7f83ec0b3ce0, pid=110423 >>> lk-owner=703dd4cc407f0000} >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?[2018-08-18 22:40:35.505950] I [MSGID: 101055] >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?[client_t.c:443:gf_client_unref] 0-home-server: Shutting >>> down >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?connection >>> >? ? ?brax-110405-2018/08/16-08:36:28:575972-home-client-0-0-0 >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?Since I'm running another replica 3 setup for oVirt for a >>> >? ? ?long time >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?now which is completely stable I thought I made a mistake >>> >? ? ?setting >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?different options at first. However even when I reset >>> >? ? ?those options >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?I'm able to reproduce the connection problem. >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?The unoptimized volume setup looks like this: >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?Volume Name: home >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?Type: Replicate >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?Volume ID: c92fa4cc-4a26-41ff-8c70-1dd07f733ac8 >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?Status: Started >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?Snapshot Count: 0 >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3 >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?Transport-type: tcp >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?Bricks: >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?Brick1: sphere-four:/srv/gluster_home/brick >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?Brick2: sphere-five:/srv/gluster_home/brick >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?Brick3: sphere-six:/srv/gluster_home/brick >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?Options Reconfigured: >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?nfs.disable: on >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?transport.address-family: inet >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?cluster.quorum-type: auto >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?cluster.server-quorum-type: server >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?cluster.server-quorum-ratio: 50% >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?The following additional options were used before: >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?performance.cache-size: 5GB >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?client.event-threads: 4 >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?server.event-threads: 4 >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?cluster.lookup-optimize: on >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?features.cache-invalidation: on >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?performance.stat-prefetch: on >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?performance.cache-invalidation: on >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?network.inode-lru-limit: 50000 >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?features.cache-invalidation-timeout: 600 >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?performance.md-cache-timeout: 600 >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?performance.parallel-readdir: on >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?In this case the gluster servers and also the client is >>> >? ? ?using a >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?bonded network device running in adaptive load balancing >>> mode. >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?I've tried using the debug option for the client mount. >>> >? ? ?But except >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?for a ~0.5TB log file I didn't get information that seems >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?helpful to me. >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?Transferring just a couple of GB works without problems. >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?It may very well be that I'm already blind to the obvious >>> >? ? ?but after >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?many long running tests I can't find the crux in the setup. >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?Does anyone have an idea as how to approach this problem >>> >? ? ?in a way >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?that sheds some useful information? >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?Any help is highly appreciated! >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?Cheers >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?Richard >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?-- >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?/dev/null >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?_______________________________________________ >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?Gluster-users mailing list >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org> >>> >? ? ?<mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org >>> <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>> >>> >? ? ?<mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org >>> <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org> >>> >? ? ?<mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org >>> <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>>> >>> >? ? ?>? ? ?https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>> <https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users> >>> >? ? ?<https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>> <https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>> >>> >? ? ?>? ? >>> ?<https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>> <https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users> >>> >? ? ?<https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>> <https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>>> >>> >? ? ?> >>> >? ? ?> >>> > >>> > >>> >? ? ?-- >>> >? ? ?/dev/null >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> /dev/null >>> >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-users mailing list >> Gluster-users at gluster.org >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180921/4f96ab50/attachment.sig>
Vijay Bellur
2018-Sep-24 22:39 UTC
[Gluster-users] gluster connection interrupted during transfer
Hello Richard, Thank you for the logs. I am wondering if this could be a different memory leak than the one addressed in the bug. Would it be possible for you to obtain a statedump of the client so that we can understand the memory allocation pattern better? Details about gathering a statedump can be found at [1]. Please ensure that /var/run/gluster is present before triggering a statedump. Regards, Vijay [1] https://docs.gluster.org/en/v3/Troubleshooting/statedump/ On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 12:14 AM Richard Neuboeck <hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at> wrote:> Hi again, > > in my limited - non full time programmer - understanding it's a memory > leak in the gluster fuse client. > > Should I reopen the mentioned bugreport or open a new one? Or would the > community prefer an entirely different approach? > > Thanks > Richard > > On 13.09.18 10:07, Richard Neuboeck wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've created excerpts from the brick and client logs +/- 1 minute to > > the kill event. Still the logs are ~400-500MB so will put them > > somewhere to download since I have no idea what I should be looking > > for and skimming them didn't reveal obvious problems to me. > > > > http://www.tbi.univie.ac.at/~hawk/gluster/brick_3min_excerpt.log > > http://www.tbi.univie.ac.at/~hawk/gluster/mnt_3min_excerpt.log > > > > I was pointed in the direction of the following Bugreport > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613512 > > It sounds right but seems to have been addressed already. > > > > If there is anything I can do to help solve this problem please let > > me know. Thanks for your help! > > > > Cheers > > Richard > > > > > > On 9/11/18 10:10 AM, Richard Neuboeck wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> since I feared that the logs would fill up the partition (again) I > >> checked the systems daily and finally found the reason. The glusterfs > >> process on the client runs out of memory and get's killed by OOM after > >> about four days. Since rsync runs for a couple of days longer till it > >> ends I never checked the whole time frame in the system logs and never > >> stumbled upon the OOM message. > >> > >> Running out of memory on a 128GB RAM system even with a DB occupying > >> ~40% of that is kind of strange though. Might there be a leak? > >> > >> But this would explain the erratic behavior I've experienced over the > >> last 1.5 years while trying to work with our homes on glusterfs. > >> > >> Here is the kernel log message for the killed glusterfs process. > >> https://gist.github.com/bleuchien/3d2b87985ecb944c60347d5e8660e36a > >> > >> I'm checking the brick and client trace logs. But those are respectively > >> 1TB and 2TB in size so searching in them takes a while. I'll be creating > >> gists for both logs about the time when the process died. > >> > >> As soon as I have more details I'll post them. > >> > >> Here you can see a graphical representation of the memory usage of this > >> system: https://imgur.com/a/4BINtfr > >> > >> Cheers > >> Richard > >> > >> > >> > >> On 31.08.18 08:13, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Richard Neuboeck > >>> <hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at>> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 08/31/2018 03:50 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > >>> > +Mohit. +Milind > >>> > > >>> > @Mohit/Milind, > >>> > > >>> > Can you check logs and see whether you can find anything > relevant? > >>> > >>> From glances at the system logs nothing out of the ordinary > >>> occurred. However I'll start another rsync and take a closer look. > >>> It will take a few days. > >>> > >>> > > >>> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 7:04 PM, Richard Neuboeck > >>> > <hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at> > >>> <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at>>> > wrote: > >>> > > >>> > Hi, > >>> > > >>> > I'm attaching a shortened version since the whole is about > 5.8GB of > >>> > the client mount log. It includes the initial mount messages > and the > >>> > last two minutes of log entries. > >>> > > >>> > It ends very anticlimactic without an obvious error. Is there > >>> > anything specific I should be looking for? > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > Normally I look logs around disconnect msgs to find out the > reason. > >>> > But as you said, sometimes one can see just disconnect msgs > without > >>> > any reason. That normally points to reason for disconnect in the > >>> > network rather than a Glusterfs initiated disconnect. > >>> > >>> The rsync source is serving our homes currently so there are NFS > >>> connections 24/7. There don't seem to be any network related > >>> interruptions > >>> > >>> > >>> Can you set diagnostics.client-log-level and > diagnostics.brick-log-level > >>> to TRACE and check logs of both ends of connections - client and brick? > >>> To reduce the logsize, I would suggest to logrotate existing logs and > >>> start with fresh logs when you are about to start so that only relevant > >>> logs are captured. Also, can you take strace of client and brick > process > >>> using: > >>> > >>> strace -o <outputfile> -ff -v -p <pid> > >>> > >>> attach both logs and strace. Let's trace through what syscalls on > socket > >>> return and then decide whether to inspect tcpdump or not. If you don't > >>> want to repeat tests again, please capture tcpdump too (on both ends of > >>> connection) and send them to us. > >>> > >>> > >>> - a co-worker would be here faster than I could check > >>> the logs if the connection to home would be broken ;-) > >>> The three gluster machines are due to this problem reduced to only > >>> testing so there is nothing else running. > >>> > >>> > >>> > > >>> > Cheers > >>> > Richard > >>> > > >>> > On 08/30/2018 02:40 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > >>> > > Normally client logs will give a clue on why the > disconnections are > >>> > > happening (ping-timeout, wrong port etc). Can you look > into client > >>> > > logs to figure out what's happening? If you can't find > anything, can > >>> > > you send across client logs? > >>> > > > >>> > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 6:11 PM, Richard Neuboeck > >>> > > <hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at> > >>> <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at>> > >>> > <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at> > >>> <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at>>>> > >>> > wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > Hi Gluster Community, > >>> > > > >>> > > I have problems with a glusterfs 'Transport endpoint > not > >>> > connected' > >>> > > connection abort during file transfers that I can > >>> > replicate (all the > >>> > > time now) but not pinpoint as to why this is happening. > >>> > > > >>> > > The volume is set up in replica 3 mode and accessed > with > >>> > the fuse > >>> > > gluster client. Both client and server are running > CentOS > >>> > and the > >>> > > supplied 3.12.11 version of gluster. > >>> > > > >>> > > The connection abort happens at different times during > >>> > rsync but > >>> > > occurs every time I try to sync all our files (1.1TB) > to > >>> > the empty > >>> > > volume. > >>> > > > >>> > > Client and server side I don't find errors in the > gluster > >>> > log files. > >>> > > rsync logs the obvious transfer problem. The only log > that > >>> > shows > >>> > > anything related is the server brick log which states > >>> that the > >>> > > connection is shutting down: > >>> > > > >>> > > [2018-08-18 22:40:35.502510] I [MSGID: 115036] > >>> > > [server.c:527:server_rpc_notify] 0-home-server: > >>> disconnecting > >>> > > connection from > >>> > > > brax-110405-2018/08/16-08:36:28:575972-home-client-0-0-0 > >>> > > [2018-08-18 22:40:35.502620] W > >>> > > [inodelk.c:499:pl_inodelk_log_cleanup] 0-home-server: > >>> > releasing lock > >>> > > on eaeb0398-fefd-486d-84a7-f13744d1cf10 held by > >>> > > {client=0x7f83ec0b3ce0, pid=110423 > >>> lk-owner=d0fd5ffb427f0000} > >>> > > [2018-08-18 22:40:35.502692] W > >>> > > [entrylk.c:864:pl_entrylk_log_cleanup] 0-home-server: > >>> > releasing lock > >>> > > on faa93f7b-6c46-4251-b2b2-abcd2f2613e1 held by > >>> > > {client=0x7f83ec0b3ce0, pid=110423 > >>> lk-owner=703dd4cc407f0000} > >>> > > [2018-08-18 22:40:35.502719] W > >>> > > [entrylk.c:864:pl_entrylk_log_cleanup] 0-home-server: > >>> > releasing lock > >>> > > on faa93f7b-6c46-4251-b2b2-abcd2f2613e1 held by > >>> > > {client=0x7f83ec0b3ce0, pid=110423 > >>> lk-owner=703dd4cc407f0000} > >>> > > [2018-08-18 22:40:35.505950] I [MSGID: 101055] > >>> > > [client_t.c:443:gf_client_unref] 0-home-server: > Shutting > >>> down > >>> > > connection > >>> > brax-110405-2018/08/16-08:36:28:575972-home-client-0-0-0 > >>> > > > >>> > > Since I'm running another replica 3 setup for oVirt > for a > >>> > long time > >>> > > now which is completely stable I thought I made a > mistake > >>> > setting > >>> > > different options at first. However even when I reset > >>> > those options > >>> > > I'm able to reproduce the connection problem. > >>> > > > >>> > > The unoptimized volume setup looks like this: > >>> > > > >>> > > Volume Name: home > >>> > > Type: Replicate > >>> > > Volume ID: c92fa4cc-4a26-41ff-8c70-1dd07f733ac8 > >>> > > Status: Started > >>> > > Snapshot Count: 0 > >>> > > Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3 > >>> > > Transport-type: tcp > >>> > > Bricks: > >>> > > Brick1: sphere-four:/srv/gluster_home/brick > >>> > > Brick2: sphere-five:/srv/gluster_home/brick > >>> > > Brick3: sphere-six:/srv/gluster_home/brick > >>> > > Options Reconfigured: > >>> > > nfs.disable: on > >>> > > transport.address-family: inet > >>> > > cluster.quorum-type: auto > >>> > > cluster.server-quorum-type: server > >>> > > cluster.server-quorum-ratio: 50% > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > The following additional options were used before: > >>> > > > >>> > > performance.cache-size: 5GB > >>> > > client.event-threads: 4 > >>> > > server.event-threads: 4 > >>> > > cluster.lookup-optimize: on > >>> > > features.cache-invalidation: on > >>> > > performance.stat-prefetch: on > >>> > > performance.cache-invalidation: on > >>> > > network.inode-lru-limit: 50000 > >>> > > features.cache-invalidation-timeout: 600 > >>> > > performance.md-cache-timeout: 600 > >>> > > performance.parallel-readdir: on > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > In this case the gluster servers and also the client is > >>> > using a > >>> > > bonded network device running in adaptive load > balancing > >>> mode. > >>> > > > >>> > > I've tried using the debug option for the client mount. > >>> > But except > >>> > > for a ~0.5TB log file I didn't get information that > seems > >>> > > helpful to me. > >>> > > > >>> > > Transferring just a couple of GB works without > problems. > >>> > > > >>> > > It may very well be that I'm already blind to the > obvious > >>> > but after > >>> > > many long running tests I can't find the crux in the > setup. > >>> > > > >>> > > Does anyone have an idea as how to approach this > problem > >>> > in a way > >>> > > that sheds some useful information? > >>> > > > >>> > > Any help is highly appreciated! > >>> > > Cheers > >>> > > Richard > >>> > > > >>> > > -- > >>> > > /dev/null > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > _______________________________________________ > >>> > > Gluster-users mailing list > >>> > > Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto: > Gluster-users at gluster.org> > >>> > <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org > >>> <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>> > >>> > <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org > >>> <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org> > >>> > <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org > >>> <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>>> > >>> > > > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > >>> <https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users> > >>> > <https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > >>> <https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>> > >>> > > > >>> <https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > >>> <https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users> > >>> > <https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > >>> <https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>>> > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > -- > >>> > /dev/null > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> /dev/null > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Gluster-users mailing list > >> Gluster-users at gluster.org > >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > >> > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gluster-users mailing list > > Gluster-users at gluster.org > > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180924/fa1262b1/attachment.html>
Richard Neuboeck
2018-Oct-15 08:48 UTC
[Gluster-users] gluster connection interrupted during transfer
Hi Vijay, sorry it took so long. I've upgraded the gluster server and client to the latest packages 3.12.14-1.el7.x86_64 available in CentOS. Incredibly my first test after the update worked perfectly! I'll do another couple of rsyncs, maybe apply the performance improvements again and do statedumps all the way. I'll report back if there are any more problems or if they are resolved. Thanks for the help so far! Cheers Richard On 25.09.18 00:39, Vijay Bellur wrote:> Hello Richard, > > Thank you for the logs. > > I am wondering if this could be a different memory leak than the one > addressed in the bug. Would it be possible for you to obtain a > statedump?of the client so that we can understand the memory allocation > pattern better? Details about gathering a statedump?can be found at [1]. > Please ensure that /var/run/gluster is present before triggering a > statedump. > > Regards, > Vijay > > [1]?https://docs.gluster.org/en/v3/Troubleshooting/statedump/ > > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 12:14 AM Richard Neuboeck <hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at > <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at>> wrote: > > Hi again, > > in my limited - non full time programmer - understanding it's a memory > leak in the gluster fuse client. > > Should I reopen the mentioned bugreport or open a new one? Or would the > community prefer an entirely different approach? > > Thanks > Richard > > On 13.09.18 10:07, Richard Neuboeck wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've created excerpts from the brick and client logs +/- 1 minute to > > the kill event. Still the logs are ~400-500MB so will put them > > somewhere to download since I have no idea what I should be looking > > for and skimming them didn't reveal obvious problems to me. > > > > http://www.tbi.univie.ac.at/~hawk/gluster/brick_3min_excerpt.log > <http://www.tbi.univie.ac.at/%7Ehawk/gluster/brick_3min_excerpt.log> > > http://www.tbi.univie.ac.at/~hawk/gluster/mnt_3min_excerpt.log > <http://www.tbi.univie.ac.at/%7Ehawk/gluster/mnt_3min_excerpt.log> > > > > I was pointed in the direction of the following Bugreport > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613512 > > It sounds right but seems to have been addressed already. > > > > If there is anything I can do to help solve this problem please let > > me know. Thanks for your help! > > > > Cheers > > Richard > > > > > > On 9/11/18 10:10 AM, Richard Neuboeck wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> since I feared that the logs would fill up the partition (again) I > >> checked the systems daily and finally found the reason. The glusterfs > >> process on the client runs out of memory and get's killed by OOM > after > >> about four days. Since rsync runs for a couple of days longer till it > >> ends I never checked the whole time frame in the system logs and > never > >> stumbled upon the OOM message. > >> > >> Running out of memory on a 128GB RAM system even with a DB occupying > >> ~40% of that is kind of strange though. Might there be a leak? > >> > >> But this would explain the erratic behavior I've experienced over the > >> last 1.5 years while trying to work with our homes on glusterfs. > >> > >> Here is the kernel log message for the killed glusterfs process. > >> https://gist.github.com/bleuchien/3d2b87985ecb944c60347d5e8660e36a > >> > >> I'm checking the brick and client trace logs. But those are > respectively > >> 1TB and 2TB in size so searching in them takes a while. I'll be > creating > >> gists for both logs about the time when the process died. > >> > >> As soon as I have more details I'll post them. > >> > >> Here you can see a graphical representation of the memory usage > of this > >> system: https://imgur.com/a/4BINtfr > >> > >> Cheers > >> Richard > >> > >> > >> > >> On 31.08.18 08:13, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Richard Neuboeck > >>> <hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at> > <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at>>> wrote: > >>> > >>>? ? ?On 08/31/2018 03:50 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > >>>? ? ?> +Mohit. +Milind > >>>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?> @Mohit/Milind, > >>>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?> Can you check logs and see whether you can find anything > relevant? > >>> > >>>? ? ?From glances at the system logs nothing out of the ordinary > >>>? ? ?occurred. However I'll start another rsync and take a closer > look. > >>>? ? ?It will take a few days. > >>> > >>>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 7:04 PM, Richard Neuboeck > >>>? ? ?> <hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at> > <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at>> > >>>? ? ?<mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at> > <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at>>>> wrote: > >>>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?Hi, > >>>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?I'm attaching a shortened version since the whole is > about 5.8GB of > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?the client mount log. It includes the initial mount > messages and the > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?last two minutes of log entries. > >>>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?It ends very anticlimactic without an obvious error. > Is there > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?anything specific I should be looking for? > >>>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?> Normally I look logs around disconnect msgs to find out > the reason. > >>>? ? ?> But as you said, sometimes one can see just disconnect > msgs without > >>>? ? ?> any reason. That normally points to reason for disconnect > in the > >>>? ? ?> network rather than a Glusterfs initiated disconnect. > >>> > >>>? ? ?The rsync source is serving our homes currently so there are NFS > >>>? ? ?connections 24/7. There don't seem to be any network related > >>>? ? ?interruptions > >>> > >>> > >>> Can you set diagnostics.client-log-level and > diagnostics.brick-log-level > >>> to TRACE and check logs of both ends of connections - client and > brick? > >>> To reduce the logsize, I would suggest to logrotate existing > logs and > >>> start with fresh logs when you are about to start so that only > relevant > >>> logs are captured. Also, can you take strace of client and brick > process > >>> using: > >>> > >>> strace -o <outputfile> -ff -v -p <pid> > >>> > >>> attach both logs and strace. Let's trace through what syscalls > on socket > >>> return and then decide whether to inspect tcpdump or not. If you > don't > >>> want to repeat tests again, please capture tcpdump too (on both > ends of > >>> connection) and send them to us. > >>> > >>> > >>>? ? ?- a co-worker would be here faster than I could check > >>>? ? ?the logs if the connection to home would be broken ;-) > >>>? ? ?The three gluster machines are due to this problem reduced > to only > >>>? ? ?testing so there is nothing else running. > >>> > >>> > >>>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?Cheers > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?Richard > >>>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?On 08/30/2018 02:40 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> Normally client logs will give a clue on why the > disconnections are > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> happening (ping-timeout, wrong port etc). Can you > look into client > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> logs to figure out what's happening? If you can't > find anything, can > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> you send across client logs? > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 6:11 PM, Richard Neuboeck > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> <hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at > <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at> <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at > <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at>> > >>>? ? ?<mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at> > <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at>>> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?<mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at > <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at> <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at > <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at>> > >>>? ? ?<mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at> > <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at <mailto:hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at>>>>> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?wrote: > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?Hi Gluster Community, > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?I have problems with a glusterfs 'Transport > endpoint not > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?connected' > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?connection abort during file transfers that I can > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?replicate (all the > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?time now) but not pinpoint as to why this is > happening. > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?The volume is set up in replica 3 mode and > accessed with > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?the fuse > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?gluster client. Both client and server are > running CentOS > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?and the > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?supplied 3.12.11 version of gluster. > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?The connection abort happens at different times > during > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?rsync but > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?occurs every time I try to sync all our files > (1.1TB) to > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?the empty > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?volume. > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?Client and server side I don't find errors in > the gluster > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?log files. > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?rsync logs the obvious transfer problem. The > only log that > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?shows > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?anything related is the server brick log which > states > >>>? ? ?that the > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?connection is shutting down: > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?[2018-08-18 22:40:35.502510] I [MSGID: 115036] > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?[server.c:527:server_rpc_notify] 0-home-server: > >>>? ? ?disconnecting > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?connection from > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? > ?brax-110405-2018/08/16-08:36:28:575972-home-client-0-0-0 > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?[2018-08-18 22:40:35.502620] W > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?[inodelk.c:499:pl_inodelk_log_cleanup] > 0-home-server: > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?releasing lock > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?on eaeb0398-fefd-486d-84a7-f13744d1cf10 held by > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?{client=0x7f83ec0b3ce0, pid=110423 > >>>? ? ?lk-owner=d0fd5ffb427f0000} > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?[2018-08-18 22:40:35.502692] W > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?[entrylk.c:864:pl_entrylk_log_cleanup] > 0-home-server: > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?releasing lock > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?on faa93f7b-6c46-4251-b2b2-abcd2f2613e1 held by > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?{client=0x7f83ec0b3ce0, pid=110423 > >>>? ? ?lk-owner=703dd4cc407f0000} > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?[2018-08-18 22:40:35.502719] W > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?[entrylk.c:864:pl_entrylk_log_cleanup] > 0-home-server: > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?releasing lock > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?on faa93f7b-6c46-4251-b2b2-abcd2f2613e1 held by > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?{client=0x7f83ec0b3ce0, pid=110423 > >>>? ? ?lk-owner=703dd4cc407f0000} > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?[2018-08-18 22:40:35.505950] I [MSGID: 101055] > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?[client_t.c:443:gf_client_unref] 0-home-server: > Shutting > >>>? ? ?down > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?connection > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?brax-110405-2018/08/16-08:36:28:575972-home-client-0-0-0 > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?Since I'm running another replica 3 setup for > oVirt for a > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?long time > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?now which is completely stable I thought I made > a mistake > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?setting > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?different options at first. However even when I > reset > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?those options > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?I'm able to reproduce the connection problem. > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?The unoptimized volume setup looks like this: > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?Volume Name: home > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?Type: Replicate > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?Volume ID: c92fa4cc-4a26-41ff-8c70-1dd07f733ac8 > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?Status: Started > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?Snapshot Count: 0 > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3 > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?Transport-type: tcp > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?Bricks: > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?Brick1: sphere-four:/srv/gluster_home/brick > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?Brick2: sphere-five:/srv/gluster_home/brick > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?Brick3: sphere-six:/srv/gluster_home/brick > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?Options Reconfigured: > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?nfs.disable: on > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?transport.address-family: inet > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?cluster.quorum-type: auto > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?cluster.server-quorum-type: server > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?cluster.server-quorum-ratio: 50% > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?The following additional options were used before: > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?performance.cache-size: 5GB > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?client.event-threads: 4 > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?server.event-threads: 4 > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?cluster.lookup-optimize: on > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?features.cache-invalidation: on > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?performance.stat-prefetch: on > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?performance.cache-invalidation: on > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?network.inode-lru-limit: 50000 > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?features.cache-invalidation-timeout: 600 > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?performance.md-cache-timeout: 600 > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?performance.parallel-readdir: on > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?In this case the gluster servers and also the > client is > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?using a > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?bonded network device running in adaptive load > balancing > >>>? ? ?mode. > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?I've tried using the debug option for the client > mount. > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?But except > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?for a ~0.5TB log file I didn't get information > that seems > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?helpful to me. > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?Transferring just a couple of GB works without > problems. > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?It may very well be that I'm already blind to > the obvious > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?but after > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?many long running tests I can't find the crux in > the setup. > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?Does anyone have an idea as how to approach this > problem > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?in a way > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?that sheds some useful information? > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?Any help is highly appreciated! > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?Cheers > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?Richard > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?-- > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?/dev/null > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?_______________________________________________ > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?Gluster-users mailing list > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? ?Gluster-users at gluster.org > <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org> <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org > <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?<mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org > <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org> > >>>? ? ?<mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org > <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>>> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?<mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org > <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org> > >>>? ? ?<mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org > <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?<mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org > <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org> > >>>? ? ?<mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org > <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>>>> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? > ?https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > >>>? ? ?<https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?<https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > >>>? ? ?<https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?>? ? > >>>? ? ??<https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > >>>? ? ?<https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?<https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > >>>? ? ?<https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>>> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?-- > >>>? ? ?>? ? ?/dev/null > >>>? ? ?> > >>>? ? ?> > >>> > >>> > >>>? ? ?-- > >>>? ? ?/dev/null > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Gluster-users mailing list > >> Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org> > >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > >> > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gluster-users mailing list > > Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org> > > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20181015/37a40617/attachment.sig>