Sam McLeod
2018-Mar-18 22:13 UTC
[Gluster-users] Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)
Howdy all,
We're experiencing terrible small file performance when copying or moving
files on gluster clients.
In the example below, Gluster is taking 6mins~ to copy 128MB / 21,000 files
sideways on a client, doing the same thing on NFS (which I know is a totally
different solution etc. etc.) takes approximately 10-15 seconds(!).
Any advice for tuning the volume or XFS settings would be greatly appreciated.
Hopefully I've included enough relevant information below.
## Gluster Client
root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ # du -sh .
127M .
root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ # find . -type f | wc -l
21791
root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ # du 9584toto9584.txt
4 9584toto9584.txt
root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ # time cp -a private
private_perf_test
real 5m51.862s
user 0m0.862s
sys 0m8.334s
root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ # time rm -rf private_perf_test/
real 0m49.702s
user 0m0.087s
sys 0m0.958s
## Hosts
- 16x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz per Gluster host / client
- Storage: iSCSI provisioned (via 10Gbit DAC/Fibre), SSD disk, 50K R/RW 4k
IOP/s, 400MB/s per Gluster host
- Volumes are replicated across two hosts and one arbiter only host
- Networking is 10Gbit DAC/Fibre between Gluster hosts and clients
- 18GB DDR4 ECC memory
## Volume Info
root at gluster-host-01:~ # gluster pool list
UUID Hostname State
ad02970b-e2aa-4ca8-998c-bd10d5970faa gluster-host-02.fqdn Connected
ea116a94-c19e-48db-b108-0be3ae622e2e gluster-host-03.fqdn Connected
2e855c25-e7ac-4ff6-be85-e8bcc6f45ee4 localhost Connected
root at gluster-host-01:~ # gluster volume info uat_storage
Volume Name: uat_storage
Type: Replicate
Volume ID: 7918f1c5-5031-47b8-b054-56f6f0c569a2
Status: Started
Snapshot Count: 0
Number of Bricks: 1 x (2 + 1) = 3
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: gluster-host-01.fqdn:/mnt/gluster-storage/uat_storage
Brick2: gluster-host-02.fqdn:/mnt/gluster-storage/uat_storage
Brick3: gluster-host-03.fqdn:/mnt/gluster-storage/uat_storage (arbiter)
Options Reconfigured:
performance.rda-cache-limit: 256MB
network.inode-lru-limit: 50000
server.outstanding-rpc-limit: 256
performance.client-io-threads: true
nfs.disable: on
transport.address-family: inet
client.event-threads: 8
cluster.eager-lock: true
cluster.favorite-child-policy: size
cluster.lookup-optimize: true
cluster.readdir-optimize: true
cluster.use-compound-fops: true
diagnostics.brick-log-level: ERROR
diagnostics.client-log-level: ERROR
features.cache-invalidation-timeout: 600
features.cache-invalidation: true
network.ping-timeout: 15
performance.cache-invalidation: true
performance.cache-max-file-size: 6MB
performance.cache-refresh-timeout: 60
performance.cache-size: 1024MB
performance.io-thread-count: 16
performance.md-cache-timeout: 600
performance.stat-prefetch: true
performance.write-behind-window-size: 256MB
server.event-threads: 8
transport.listen-backlog: 2048
root at gluster-host-01:~ # xfs_info /dev/mapper/gluster-storage-unlocked
meta-data=/dev/mapper/gluster-storage-unlocked isize=512 agcount=4,
agsize=196607360 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=1
= crc=1 finobt=0 spinodes=0
data = bsize=4096 blocks=786429440, imaxpct=5
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=8192 ascii-ci=0 ftype=1
log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=383998, version=2
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
--
Sam McLeod (protoporpoise on IRC)
https://smcleod.net
https://twitter.com/s_mcleod
Words are my own opinions and do not necessarily represent those of my employer
or partners.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180319/7ddff934/attachment.html>
TomK
2018-Mar-18 23:37 UTC
[Gluster-users] Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)
On 3/18/2018 6:13 PM, Sam McLeod wrote: Even your NFS transfers are 12.5 or so MB per second or less. 1) Did you use fdisk and LVM under that XFS filesystem? 2) Did you benchmark the XFS with something like bonnie++? (There's probably newer benchmark suites now.) 3) Did you benchmark your Network transfer speeds? Perhaps your NIC negotiated a lower speed. 3) I've done XFS tuning for another purpose but got good results. If it helps, I can send you the doc. Cheers, Tom> Howdy all, > > We're experiencing terrible small file performance when copying or > moving files on gluster clients. > > In the example below, Gluster is taking 6mins~ to copy 128MB / 21,000 > files sideways on a client, doing the same thing on NFS (which I know is > a totally different solution etc. etc.) takes approximately 10-15 > seconds(!). > > Any advice for tuning the volume or XFS settings would be greatly > appreciated. > > Hopefully I've included enough relevant information below. > > > ## Gluster Client > > root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ ?# du -sh . > 127M ? ?. > root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ ?# find . -type f | wc -l > 21791 > root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ ?# du 9584toto9584.txt > 4 ? ?9584toto9584.txt > > > root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ ?# time cp -a private > private_perf_test > > real ? ?5m51.862s > user ? ?0m0.862s > sys ? ?0m8.334s > > root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ # time rm -rf private_perf_test/ > > real ? ?0m49.702s > user ? ?0m0.087s > sys ? ?0m0.958s > > > ## Hosts > > - 16x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz per Gluster host / client > - Storage: iSCSI provisioned (via 10Gbit DAC/Fibre), SSD disk, 50K R/RW > 4k IOP/s, 400MB/s per Gluster host > - Volumes are replicated across two hosts and one arbiter only host > - Networking is 10Gbit DAC/Fibre between Gluster hosts and clients > - 18GB DDR4 ECC memory > > ## Volume Info > > root at gluster-host-01:~ # gluster pool list > UUID ? ? ? ? ?Hostname ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?State > ad02970b-e2aa-4ca8-998c-bd10d5970faa ?gluster-host-02.fqdn Connected > ea116a94-c19e-48db-b108-0be3ae622e2e ?gluster-host-03.fqdn Connected > 2e855c25-e7ac-4ff6-be85-e8bcc6f45ee4 ?localhost > Connected > > root at gluster-host-01:~ # gluster volume info uat_storage > > Volume Name: uat_storage > Type: Replicate > Volume ID: 7918f1c5-5031-47b8-b054-56f6f0c569a2 > Status: Started > Snapshot Count: 0 > Number of Bricks: 1 x (2 + 1) = 3 > Transport-type: tcp > Bricks: > Brick1: gluster-host-01.fqdn:/mnt/gluster-storage/uat_storage > Brick2: gluster-host-02.fqdn:/mnt/gluster-storage/uat_storage > Brick3: gluster-host-03.fqdn:/mnt/gluster-storage/uat_storage (arbiter) > Options Reconfigured: > performance.rda-cache-limit: 256MB > network.inode-lru-limit: 50000 > server.outstanding-rpc-limit: 256 > performance.client-io-threads: true > nfs.disable: on > transport.address-family: inet > client.event-threads: 8 > cluster.eager-lock: true > cluster.favorite-child-policy: size > cluster.lookup-optimize: true > cluster.readdir-optimize: true > cluster.use-compound-fops: true > diagnostics.brick-log-level: ERROR > diagnostics.client-log-level: ERROR > features.cache-invalidation-timeout: 600 > features.cache-invalidation: true > network.ping-timeout: 15 > performance.cache-invalidation: true > performance.cache-max-file-size: 6MB > performance.cache-refresh-timeout: 60 > performance.cache-size: 1024MB > performance.io <http://performance.io>-thread-count: 16 > performance.md-cache-timeout: 600 > performance.stat-prefetch: true > performance.write-behind-window-size: 256MB > server.event-threads: 8 > transport.listen-backlog: 2048 > > root at gluster-host-01:~ # xfs_info /dev/mapper/gluster-storage-unlocked > meta-data=/dev/mapper/gluster-storage-unlocked isize=512 ? ?agcount=4, > agsize=196607360 blks > ? ? ? ? ?= ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? sectsz=512 ? attr=2, projid32bit=1 > ? ? ? ? ?= ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? crc=1 ? ? ? ?finobt=0 spinodes=0 > data ? ? = ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? bsize=4096 ? blocks=786429440, imaxpct=5 > ? ? ? ? ?= ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? sunit=0 ? ? ?swidth=0 blks > naming ? =version 2 ? ? ? ? ? ? ?bsize=8192 ? ascii-ci=0 ftype=1 > log ? ? ?=internal ? ? ? ? ? ? ? bsize=4096 ? blocks=383998, version=2 > ? ? ? ? ?= ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? sectsz=512 ? sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1 > realtime =none ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? extsz=4096 ? blocks=0, rtextents=0 > > > -- > Sam McLeod (protoporpoise on IRC) > https://smcleod.net > https://twitter.com/s_mcleod > > Words are my own opinions and do not?necessarily represent those of > my?employer or partners. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >-- Cheers, Tom K. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Living on earth is expensive, but it includes a free trip around the sun.
Sam McLeod
2018-Mar-19 00:20 UTC
[Gluster-users] Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)
Hi Tom,
Thanks for your reply.
1. Yes XFS is on a LUKs LV (see below).
2. Yes, I prefer FIO but each Gluster host gets between 50-100K 4K random IOP/s
both write and read to disk.
3. Yes, we actually use 2x 10Gbit DACs in LACP, but we get full 10Gbit speeds
(and very low latency thanks to the DACs).
4. I'd love to see that, it'd be much appreciated thanks.
# lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
xvdc 202:32 0 1.5T 0 disk
??xvdc1 202:33 0 1.5T 0 part
??gluster-storage 253:1 0 3T 0 lvm
??gluster-storage-unlocked 253:3 0 3T 0 crypt /mnt/gluster-storage
xvda 202:0 0 18G 0 disk
??xvda2 202:2 0 17.5G 0 part
? ??centos-var 253:2 0 9.5G 0 lvm /var
? ??centos-root 253:0 0 8G 0 lvm /
??xvda1 202:1 0 500M 0 part /boot
sr0 11:0 1 1024M 0 rom
xvdb 202:16 0 1.5T 0 disk
??xvdb1 202:17 0 1.5T 0 part
??gluster-storage 253:1 0 3T 0 lvm
??gluster-storage-unlocked 253:3 0 3T 0 crypt /mnt/gluster-storage
--
Sam McLeod
Please respond via email when possible.
https://smcleod.net
https://twitter.com/s_mcleod
> On 19 Mar 2018, at 10:37 am, TomK <tomkcpr at mdevsys.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/18/2018 6:13 PM, Sam McLeod wrote:
> Even your NFS transfers are 12.5 or so MB per second or less.
>
> 1) Did you use fdisk and LVM under that XFS filesystem?
>
> 2) Did you benchmark the XFS with something like bonnie++? (There's
probably newer benchmark suites now.)
>
> 3) Did you benchmark your Network transfer speeds? Perhaps your NIC
negotiated a lower speed.
>
> 3) I've done XFS tuning for another purpose but got good results. If
it helps, I can send you the doc.
>
> Cheers,
> Tom
>
>> Howdy all,
>> We're experiencing terrible small file performance when copying or
moving files on gluster clients.
>> In the example below, Gluster is taking 6mins~ to copy 128MB / 21,000
files sideways on a client, doing the same thing on NFS (which I know is a
totally different solution etc. etc.) takes approximately 10-15 seconds(!).
>> Any advice for tuning the volume or XFS settings would be greatly
appreciated.
>> Hopefully I've included enough relevant information below.
>> ## Gluster Client
>> root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ # du -sh .
>> 127M .
>> root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ # find . -type f | wc
-l
>> 21791
>> root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ # du 9584toto9584.txt
>> 4 9584toto9584.txt
>> root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ # time cp -a private
private_perf_test
>> real 5m51.862s
>> user 0m0.862s
>> sys 0m8.334s
>> root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ # time rm -rf
private_perf_test/
>> real 0m49.702s
>> user 0m0.087s
>> sys 0m0.958s
>> ## Hosts
>> - 16x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz per Gluster host /
client
>> - Storage: iSCSI provisioned (via 10Gbit DAC/Fibre), SSD disk, 50K R/RW
4k IOP/s, 400MB/s per Gluster host
>> - Volumes are replicated across two hosts and one arbiter only host
>> - Networking is 10Gbit DAC/Fibre between Gluster hosts and clients
>> - 18GB DDR4 ECC memory
>> ## Volume Info
>> root at gluster-host-01:~ # gluster pool list
>> UUID Hostname State
>> ad02970b-e2aa-4ca8-998c-bd10d5970faa gluster-host-02.fqdn Connected
>> ea116a94-c19e-48db-b108-0be3ae622e2e gluster-host-03.fqdn Connected
>> 2e855c25-e7ac-4ff6-be85-e8bcc6f45ee4 localhost
Connected
>> root at gluster-host-01:~ # gluster volume info uat_storage
>> Volume Name: uat_storage
>> Type: Replicate
>> Volume ID: 7918f1c5-5031-47b8-b054-56f6f0c569a2
>> Status: Started
>> Snapshot Count: 0
>> Number of Bricks: 1 x (2 + 1) = 3
>> Transport-type: tcp
>> Bricks:
>> Brick1: gluster-host-01.fqdn:/mnt/gluster-storage/uat_storage
>> Brick2: gluster-host-02.fqdn:/mnt/gluster-storage/uat_storage
>> Brick3: gluster-host-03.fqdn:/mnt/gluster-storage/uat_storage (arbiter)
>> Options Reconfigured:
>> performance.rda-cache-limit: 256MB
>> network.inode-lru-limit: 50000
>> server.outstanding-rpc-limit: 256
>> performance.client-io-threads: true
>> nfs.disable: on
>> transport.address-family: inet
>> client.event-threads: 8
>> cluster.eager-lock: true
>> cluster.favorite-child-policy: size
>> cluster.lookup-optimize: true
>> cluster.readdir-optimize: true
>> cluster.use-compound-fops: true
>> diagnostics.brick-log-level: ERROR
>> diagnostics.client-log-level: ERROR
>> features.cache-invalidation-timeout: 600
>> features.cache-invalidation: true
>> network.ping-timeout: 15
>> performance.cache-invalidation: true
>> performance.cache-max-file-size: 6MB
>> performance.cache-refresh-timeout: 60
>> performance.cache-size: 1024MB
>> performance.io <http://performance.io/> <http://performance.io
<http://performance.io/>>-thread-count: 16
>> performance.md-cache-timeout: 600
>> performance.stat-prefetch: true
>> performance.write-behind-window-size: 256MB
>> server.event-threads: 8
>> transport.listen-backlog: 2048
>> root at gluster-host-01:~ # xfs_info
/dev/mapper/gluster-storage-unlocked
>> meta-data=/dev/mapper/gluster-storage-unlocked isize=512 agcount=4,
agsize=196607360 blks
>> = sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=1
>> = crc=1 finobt=0 spinodes=0
>> data = bsize=4096 blocks=786429440,
imaxpct=5
>> = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
>> naming =version 2 bsize=8192 ascii-ci=0 ftype=1
>> log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=383998, version=2
>> = sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks,
lazy-count=1
>> realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
>> --
>> Sam McLeod (protoporpoise on IRC)
>> https://smcleod.net
>> https://twitter.com/s_mcleod
>> Words are my own opinions and do not necessarily represent those of my
employer or partners.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at
gluster.org>
>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
<http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Tom K.
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Living on earth is expensive, but it includes a free trip around the sun.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180319/3e9a4ed1/attachment.html>
Rik Theys
2018-Mar-19 09:37 UTC
[Gluster-users] Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)
Hi, I've done some similar tests and experience similar performance issues (see my 'gluster for home directories?' thread on the list). If I read your mail correctly, you are comparing an NFS mount of the brick disk against a gluster mount (using the fuse client)? Which options do you have set on the NFS export (sync or async)?>From my tests, I concluded that the issue was not bandwidth but latency.Gluster will only return an IO operation once all bricks have confirmed that the data is on disk. If you are using a fuse mount, you might compare with using the 'direct-io-mode=disable' option on the client might help (no experience with this). In our tests, I've used NFS-ganesha to serve the gluster volume over NFS. This makes things even worse as NFS-ganesha has no "async" mode, which makes performance terrible. If you find a magic knob to make glusterfs fast on small-file workloads, do let me know! Regards, Rik On 03/18/2018 11:13 PM, Sam McLeod wrote:> Howdy all, > > We're experiencing terrible small file performance when copying or > moving files on gluster clients. > > In the example below, Gluster is taking 6mins~ to copy 128MB / 21,000 > files sideways on a client, doing the same thing on NFS (which I know is > a totally different solution etc. etc.) takes approximately 10-15 > seconds(!). > > Any advice for tuning the volume or XFS settings would be greatly > appreciated. > > Hopefully I've included enough relevant information below. > > > ## Gluster Client > > root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ ?# du -sh . > 127M ? ?. > root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ ?# find . -type f | wc -l > 21791 > root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ ?# du 9584toto9584.txt > 4 ? ?9584toto9584.txt > > > root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ ?# time cp -a private > private_perf_test > > real ? ?5m51.862s > user ? ?0m0.862s > sys ? ?0m8.334s > > root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ # time rm -rf private_perf_test/ > > real ? ?0m49.702s > user ? ?0m0.087s > sys ? ?0m0.958s > > > ## Hosts > > - 16x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz per Gluster host / client > - Storage: iSCSI provisioned (via 10Gbit DAC/Fibre), SSD disk, 50K R/RW > 4k IOP/s, 400MB/s per Gluster host > - Volumes are replicated across two hosts and one arbiter only host > - Networking is 10Gbit DAC/Fibre between Gluster hosts and clients > - 18GB DDR4 ECC memory > > ## Volume Info > > root at gluster-host-01:~ # gluster pool list > UUID ? ? ? ? ?Hostname ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?State > ad02970b-e2aa-4ca8-998c-bd10d5970faa ?gluster-host-02.fqdn Connected > ea116a94-c19e-48db-b108-0be3ae622e2e ?gluster-host-03.fqdn Connected > 2e855c25-e7ac-4ff6-be85-e8bcc6f45ee4 ?localhost ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > Connected > > root at gluster-host-01:~ # gluster volume info uat_storage > > Volume Name: uat_storage > Type: Replicate > Volume ID: 7918f1c5-5031-47b8-b054-56f6f0c569a2 > Status: Started > Snapshot Count: 0 > Number of Bricks: 1 x (2 + 1) = 3 > Transport-type: tcp > Bricks: > Brick1: gluster-host-01.fqdn:/mnt/gluster-storage/uat_storage > Brick2: gluster-host-02.fqdn:/mnt/gluster-storage/uat_storage > Brick3: gluster-host-03.fqdn:/mnt/gluster-storage/uat_storage (arbiter) > Options Reconfigured: > performance.rda-cache-limit: 256MB > network.inode-lru-limit: 50000 > server.outstanding-rpc-limit: 256 > performance.client-io-threads: true > nfs.disable: on > transport.address-family: inet > client.event-threads: 8 > cluster.eager-lock: true > cluster.favorite-child-policy: size > cluster.lookup-optimize: true > cluster.readdir-optimize: true > cluster.use-compound-fops: true > diagnostics.brick-log-level: ERROR > diagnostics.client-log-level: ERROR > features.cache-invalidation-timeout: 600 > features.cache-invalidation: true > network.ping-timeout: 15 > performance.cache-invalidation: true > performance.cache-max-file-size: 6MB > performance.cache-refresh-timeout: 60 > performance.cache-size: 1024MB > performance.io <http://performance.io>-thread-count: 16 > performance.md-cache-timeout: 600 > performance.stat-prefetch: true > performance.write-behind-window-size: 256MB > server.event-threads: 8 > transport.listen-backlog: 2048 > > root at gluster-host-01:~ # xfs_info /dev/mapper/gluster-storage-unlocked > meta-data=/dev/mapper/gluster-storage-unlocked isize=512 ? ?agcount=4, > agsize=196607360 blks > ? ? ? ? ?= ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? sectsz=512 ? attr=2, projid32bit=1 > ? ? ? ? ?= ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? crc=1 ? ? ? ?finobt=0 spinodes=0 > data ? ? = ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? bsize=4096 ? blocks=786429440, imaxpct=5 > ? ? ? ? ?= ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? sunit=0 ? ? ?swidth=0 blks > naming ? =version 2 ? ? ? ? ? ? ?bsize=8192 ? ascii-ci=0 ftype=1 > log ? ? ?=internal ? ? ? ? ? ? ? bsize=4096 ? blocks=383998, version=2 > ? ? ? ? ?= ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? sectsz=512 ? sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1 > realtime =none ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? extsz=4096 ? blocks=0, rtextents=0 > > > -- > Sam McLeod (protoporpoise on IRC) > https://smcleod.net > https://twitter.com/s_mcleod > > Words are my own opinions and do not?necessarily represent those of > my?employer or partners. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >-- Rik Theys System Engineer KU Leuven - Dept. Elektrotechniek (ESAT) Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2440 - B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee +32(0)16/32.11.07 ---------------------------------------------------------------- <<Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors>>
Ondrej Valousek
2018-Mar-19 09:42 UTC
[Gluster-users] Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)
Hi, As I posted in my previous emails - glusterfs can never match NFS (especially async one) performance of small files/latency. That's given by the design. Nothing you can do about it. Ondrej -----Original Message----- From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of Rik Theys Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 10:38 AM To: gluster-users at gluster.org; mailinglists at smcleod.net Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD) Hi, I've done some similar tests and experience similar performance issues (see my 'gluster for home directories?' thread on the list). If I read your mail correctly, you are comparing an NFS mount of the brick disk against a gluster mount (using the fuse client)? Which options do you have set on the NFS export (sync or async)?>From my tests, I concluded that the issue was not bandwidth but latency.Gluster will only return an IO operation once all bricks have confirmed that the data is on disk. If you are using a fuse mount, you might compare with using the 'direct-io-mode=disable' option on the client might help (no experience with this). In our tests, I've used NFS-ganesha to serve the gluster volume over NFS. This makes things even worse as NFS-ganesha has no "async" mode, which makes performance terrible. If you find a magic knob to make glusterfs fast on small-file workloads, do let me know! Regards, Rik On 03/18/2018 11:13 PM, Sam McLeod wrote:> Howdy all, > > We're experiencing terrible small file performance when copying or > moving files on gluster clients. > > In the example below, Gluster is taking 6mins~ to copy 128MB / 21,000 > files sideways on a client, doing the same thing on NFS (which I know > is a totally different solution etc. etc.) takes approximately 10-15 > seconds(!). > > Any advice for tuning the volume or XFS settings would be greatly > appreciated. > > Hopefully I've included enough relevant information below. > > > ## Gluster Client > > root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ ?# du -sh . > 127M ? ?. > root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ ?# find . -type f | wc -l > 21791 > root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ ?# du 9584toto9584.txt > 4 ? ?9584toto9584.txt > > > root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ ?# time cp -a private > private_perf_test > > real ? ?5m51.862s > user ? ?0m0.862s > sys ? ?0m8.334s > > root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ # time rm -rf > private_perf_test/ > > real ? ?0m49.702s > user ? ?0m0.087s > sys ? ?0m0.958s > > > ## Hosts > > - 16x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz per Gluster host / > client > - Storage: iSCSI provisioned (via 10Gbit DAC/Fibre), SSD disk, 50K > R/RW 4k IOP/s, 400MB/s per Gluster host > - Volumes are replicated across two hosts and one arbiter only host > - Networking is 10Gbit DAC/Fibre between Gluster hosts and clients > - 18GB DDR4 ECC memory > > ## Volume Info > > root at gluster-host-01:~ # gluster pool list UUID ? ? ? ? ?Hostname ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > State ad02970b-e2aa-4ca8-998c-bd10d5970faa ?gluster-host-02.fqdn > Connected ea116a94-c19e-48db-b108-0be3ae622e2e ?gluster-host-03.fqdn > Connected > 2e855c25-e7ac-4ff6-be85-e8bcc6f45ee4 ?localhost Connected > > root at gluster-host-01:~ # gluster volume info uat_storage > > Volume Name: uat_storage > Type: Replicate > Volume ID: 7918f1c5-5031-47b8-b054-56f6f0c569a2 > Status: Started > Snapshot Count: 0 > Number of Bricks: 1 x (2 + 1) = 3 > Transport-type: tcp > Bricks: > Brick1: gluster-host-01.fqdn:/mnt/gluster-storage/uat_storage > Brick2: gluster-host-02.fqdn:/mnt/gluster-storage/uat_storage > Brick3: gluster-host-03.fqdn:/mnt/gluster-storage/uat_storage > (arbiter) Options Reconfigured: > performance.rda-cache-limit: 256MB > network.inode-lru-limit: 50000 > server.outstanding-rpc-limit: 256 > performance.client-io-threads: true > nfs.disable: on > transport.address-family: inet > client.event-threads: 8 > cluster.eager-lock: true > cluster.favorite-child-policy: size > cluster.lookup-optimize: true > cluster.readdir-optimize: true > cluster.use-compound-fops: true > diagnostics.brick-log-level: ERROR > diagnostics.client-log-level: ERROR > features.cache-invalidation-timeout: 600 > features.cache-invalidation: true > network.ping-timeout: 15 > performance.cache-invalidation: true > performance.cache-max-file-size: 6MB > performance.cache-refresh-timeout: 60 > performance.cache-size: 1024MB > performance.io <http://performance.io>-thread-count: 16 > performance.md-cache-timeout: 600 > performance.stat-prefetch: true > performance.write-behind-window-size: 256MB > server.event-threads: 8 > transport.listen-backlog: 2048 > > root at gluster-host-01:~ # xfs_info /dev/mapper/gluster-storage-unlocked > meta-data=/dev/mapper/gluster-storage-unlocked isize=512 ? ?agcount=4, > agsize=196607360 blks > ? ? ? ? ?= ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? sectsz=512 ? attr=2, projid32bit=1 > ? ? ? ? ?= ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? crc=1 ? ? ? ?finobt=0 spinodes=0 data ? ? > = ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? bsize=4096 ? blocks=786429440, imaxpct=5 > ? ? ? ? ?= ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? sunit=0 ? ? ?swidth=0 blks naming ? > =version 2 ? ? ? ? ? ? ?bsize=8192 ? ascii-ci=0 ftype=1 log ? ? ? > =internal ? ? ? ? ? ? ? bsize=4096 ? blocks=383998, version=2 > ? ? ? ? ?= ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? sectsz=512 ? sunit=0 blks, > lazy-count=1 realtime =none ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? extsz=4096 ? blocks=0, > rtextents=0 > > > -- > Sam McLeod (protoporpoise on IRC) > https://smcleod.net > https://twitter.com/s_mcleod > > Words are my own opinions and do not?necessarily represent those of my? > employer or partners. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >-- Rik Theys System Engineer KU Leuven - Dept. Elektrotechniek (ESAT) Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2440 - B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee +32(0)16/32.11.07 ---------------------------------------------------------------- <<Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors>> _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users at gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users ----- The information contained in this e-mail and in any attachments is confidential and is designated solely for the attention of the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or retain this e-mail or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete all copies of this e-mail from your computer system(s). Please direct any additional queries to: communications at s3group.com. Thank You. Silicon and Software Systems Limited (S3 Group). Registered in Ireland no. 378073. Registered Office: South County Business Park, Leopardstown, Dublin 18.
Apparently Analagous Threads
- Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)
- Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)
- Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)
- Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)
- xfs not getting it right?