Halo replication [1] could be of interest here. This functionality is available since 3.11 and the current plan is to have it fully supported in a 4.x release. Note that Halo replication is built on existing synchronous replication in Gluster and differs from the current geo-replication implementation. Kotresh's response is spot on for the current geo-replication implementation. Regards, Vijay [1] https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/199 On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar < khiremat at redhat.com> wrote:> Hi, > > No, gluster doesn't support active-active geo-replication. It's not > planned in near future. We will let you know when it's planned. > > Thanks, > Kotresh HR > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:19 AM, atris adam <atris.adam at gmail.com> wrote: > >> hi everybody, >> >> Have glusterfs released a feature named active-active georeplication? If >> yes, in which version it is released? If no, is it planned to have this >> feature? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-users mailing list >> Gluster-users at gluster.org >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> > > > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > Kotresh H R > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20171024/ada3793b/attachment.html>
thx for reply, that was so much interesting to me. How can I get these news about glusterfs new features? On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com> wrote:> > Halo replication [1] could be of interest here. This functionality is > available since 3.11 and the current plan is to have it fully supported in > a 4.x release. > > Note that Halo replication is built on existing synchronous replication in > Gluster and differs from the current geo-replication implementation. > Kotresh's response is spot on for the current geo-replication > implementation. > > Regards, > Vijay > > [1] https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/199 > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar < > khiremat at redhat.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> No, gluster doesn't support active-active geo-replication. It's not >> planned in near future. We will let you know when it's planned. >> >> Thanks, >> Kotresh HR >> >> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:19 AM, atris adam <atris.adam at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> hi everybody, >>> >>> Have glusterfs released a feature named active-active georeplication? If >>> yes, in which version it is released? If no, is it planned to have this >>> feature? >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gluster-users mailing list >>> Gluster-users at gluster.org >>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks and Regards, >> Kotresh H R >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-users mailing list >> Gluster-users at gluster.org >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20171024/c2c9536b/attachment.html>
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:04 AM, atris adam <atris.adam at gmail.com> wrote:> thx for reply, that was so much interesting to me. > How can I get these news about glusterfs new features? >The release notes generally contain information about new features. You can also lookup the github projects page [2] for understanding feature to release mapping. Regards, Vijay [2] https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/projects/1> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> Halo replication [1] could be of interest here. This functionality is >> available since 3.11 and the current plan is to have it fully supported in >> a 4.x release. >> >> Note that Halo replication is built on existing synchronous replication >> in Gluster and differs from the current geo-replication implementation. >> Kotresh's response is spot on for the current geo-replication >> implementation. >> >> Regards, >> Vijay >> >> [1] https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/199 >> >> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar < >> khiremat at redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> No, gluster doesn't support active-active geo-replication. It's not >>> planned in near future. We will let you know when it's planned. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Kotresh HR >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:19 AM, atris adam <atris.adam at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> hi everybody, >>>> >>>> Have glusterfs released a feature named active-active georeplication? >>>> If yes, in which version it is released? If no, is it planned to have this >>>> feature? >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Gluster-users mailing list >>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org >>>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks and Regards, >>> Kotresh H R >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gluster-users mailing list >>> Gluster-users at gluster.org >>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>> >> >> >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20171024/cf6de47e/attachment.html>