Hi, Servers are in production with 3.10.5, so I cannot provide 3.12 related information anymore. Thanks for help, sorry for inconvenience.
Pranith Kumar Karampuri
2017-Sep-12 09:46 UTC
[Gluster-users] 3.10.5 vs 3.12.0 huge performance loss
Serkan,
Will it be possible to provide gluster volume profile <volname>
info output with 3.10.5 vs 3.12.0? That should give us clues about what
could be happening.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Serkan ?oban <cobanserkan at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
> Servers are in production with 3.10.5, so I cannot provide 3.12
> related information anymore.
> Thanks for help, sorry for inconvenience.
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
--
Pranith
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170912/b1fb86d9/attachment.html>
Sorry, I already destroyed 3.12.0 and servers are in production with 3.10.5. On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote:> Serkan, > Will it be possible to provide gluster volume profile <volname> info > output with 3.10.5 vs 3.12.0? That should give us clues about what could be > happening. > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Serkan ?oban <cobanserkan at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Servers are in production with 3.10.5, so I cannot provide 3.12 >> related information anymore. >> Thanks for help, sorry for inconvenience. >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-users mailing list >> Gluster-users at gluster.org >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > > > > -- > Pranith