Can the glusterd daemon be restarted on all storage nodes without causing any disruption to data being served or the cluster in general? I am running gluster 3.2 using distributed replica 2 volumes with fuse clients. Regards, Mark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170802/580ca163/attachment.html>
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Mark Connor <markconnor64 at gmail.com> wrote:> Can the glusterd daemon be restarted on all storage nodes without causing > any disruption to data being served or the cluster in general? I am running > gluster 3.2 using distributed replica 2 volumes with fuse clients.Yes, in general. Any clients already connected will still continue to work. What can be a problem is new clients, because glusterd may sometimes not pick up already running bricks. But most of these issues have been fixed in recent versions of GlusterFS. So, since you're using GlusterFS-3.2, which is really-really-really old, you may face this issue. You should try to run a more recent and supported version of GlusterFS if possible. 3.2 is not supported and hasn't been updated in over 5 years.> Regards, > Mark > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Sorry, I meant RedHat's Gluster Storage Server 3.2 which is latest and greatest. On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Kaushal M <kshlmster at gmail.com> wrote:> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Mark Connor <markconnor64 at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Can the glusterd daemon be restarted on all storage nodes without causing > > any disruption to data being served or the cluster in general? I am > running > > gluster 3.2 using distributed replica 2 volumes with fuse clients. > > Yes, in general. Any clients already connected will still continue to work. > > What can be a problem is new clients, because glusterd may sometimes > not pick up already running bricks. But most of these issues have been > fixed in recent versions of GlusterFS. > So, since you're using GlusterFS-3.2, which is really-really-really > old, you may face this issue. > > You should try to run a more recent and supported version of GlusterFS > if possible. 3.2 is not supported and hasn't been updated in over 5 > years. > > > Regards, > > Mark > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gluster-users mailing list > > Gluster-users at gluster.org > > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170802/cf726faa/attachment.html>