[+gluster-users]
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
> a few weeks ago I opened a survey asking oVirt users about how they use
> oVirt.
> Here are the analytics of the survey:
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1s3k4pq_U4vHTuUUKr6dOosGj_
> EGFxqEisansHlqnyyM/viewanalytics#responses
>
> Most notable facts:
> - 197 responses, two times the responses we got with the 3.6 survey!
> - CentOS confims as the most used distribution for running oVirt engine
> (89.8%) and Hypervisors (74.3% which become 94.2% including oVirt Node
> which is a CentOS spin)
> - Fedora is the second distribution (4.6%) mostly used only for runnig
> oVirt engine
> - oVirt Node jumped from 7.1% on 3.6 survey to 19.9% in 4.1!
> - Surprisingly we have someone running both engine and hypervisor on
> Ubuntu based system, within VMs. I'd like to hear more about this use
case.
> - Within other OS we had Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and 7 and Scientific
> Linux (I guess 7, wasn't specified)
> - Within the storage, there isn't a "winner" between NFS,
Gluster and
> iSCSI. Within Other Storage, Fiber Channel is the most used. We had also:
> Ceph, DAS, EMC ScaleIO, GPFS
> - Hosted Engine is the most used deployment choice with 58.4% (was 50.0%
> in 3.6)
> - 65.8% of Hosted Engine users use it in Hyperconverged setup.
>
> Thank you for your feedback and appreciation, we'll look into
suggestions
> you sent in the survey.
>
> --
>
> SANDRO BONAZZOLA
>
> ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D
>
> Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
> <https://red.ht/sig>
> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170417/1eb3c1e9/attachment.html>