ABHISHEK PALIWAL
2017-Apr-13 06:49 UTC
[Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Glusterfs meta data space consumption issue
yes it is ext4. but what is the impact of this. On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote:> Yes > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:21 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Means the fs where this brick has been created? >> On Apr 13, 2017 8:19 AM, "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu at redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Is your backend filesystem ext4? >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 6:29 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL < >>> abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> No,we are not using sharding >>>> On Apr 12, 2017 7:29 PM, "Alessandro Briosi" <ab1 at metalit.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Il 12/04/2017 14:16, ABHISHEK PALIWAL ha scritto: >>>>> >>>>> I have did more investigation and find out that brick dir size is >>>>> equivalent to gluster mount point but .glusterfs having too much difference >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You are probably using sharding? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Buon lavoro. >>>>> *Alessandro Briosi* >>>>> >>>>> *METAL.it Nord S.r.l.* >>>>> Via Maioliche 57/C - 38068 Rovereto (TN) >>>>> Tel.+39.0464.430130 - Fax +39.0464.437393 >>>>> www.metalit.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Gluster-users mailing list >>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org >>>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Pranith >>> >> > > > -- > Pranith >-- Regards Abhishek Paliwal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170413/7776cd1f/attachment.html>
Pranith Kumar Karampuri
2017-Apr-13 08:59 UTC
[Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Glusterfs meta data space consumption issue
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote:> yes it is ext4. but what is the impact of this. >Did you have a lot of data before and you deleted all that data? ext4 if I remember correctly doesn't decrease size of directory once it expands it. So in ext4 inside a directory if you create lots and lots of files and delete them all, the directory size would increase at the time of creation but won't decrease after deletion. I don't have any system with ext4 at the moment to test it now. This is something we faced 5-6 years back but not sure if it is fixed in ext4 in the latest releases.> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < > pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote: > >> Yes >> >> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:21 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL < >> abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Means the fs where this brick has been created? >>> On Apr 13, 2017 8:19 AM, "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu at redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Is your backend filesystem ext4? >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 6:29 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL < >>>> abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> No,we are not using sharding >>>>> On Apr 12, 2017 7:29 PM, "Alessandro Briosi" <ab1 at metalit.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Il 12/04/2017 14:16, ABHISHEK PALIWAL ha scritto: >>>>>> >>>>>> I have did more investigation and find out that brick dir size is >>>>>> equivalent to gluster mount point but .glusterfs having too much difference >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You are probably using sharding? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Buon lavoro. >>>>>> *Alessandro Briosi* >>>>>> >>>>>> *METAL.it Nord S.r.l.* >>>>>> Via Maioliche 57/C - 38068 Rovereto (TN) >>>>>> Tel.+39.0464.430130 - Fax +39.0464.437393 >>>>>> www.metalit.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Gluster-users mailing list >>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org >>>>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Pranith >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Pranith >> > > > > -- > > > > > Regards > Abhishek Paliwal >-- Pranith -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170413/4d4cd6c6/attachment.html>