The rsync protocol only passes blocks that have actually changed. Raw changes fewer bits. You're right, though, that it still has to check the entire file for those changes. On 03/23/17 12:47, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:> Raw or qcow doesn't change anything about the backup. > Georep always have to sync the whole file > > Additionally, raw images has much less features than qcow > > Il 23 mar 2017 8:40 PM, "Joe Julian" <joe at julianfamily.org > <mailto:joe at julianfamily.org>> ha scritto: > > I always use raw images. And yes, sharding would also be good. > > > On 03/23/17 12:36, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: >> Georep expose to another problem: >> When using gluster as storage for VM, the VM file is saved as >> qcow. Changes are inside the qcow, thus rsync has to sync the >> whole file every time >> >> A little workaround would be sharding, as rsync has to sync only >> the changed shards, but I don't think this is a good solution >> >> Il 23 mar 2017 8:33 PM, "Joe Julian" <joe at julianfamily.org >> <mailto:joe at julianfamily.org>> ha scritto: >> >> In many cases, a full backup set is just not feasible. Georep >> to the same or different DC may be an option if the bandwidth >> can keep up with the change set. If not, maybe breaking the >> data up into smaller more manageable volumes where you only >> keep a smaller set of critical data and just back that up. >> Perhaps an object store (swift?) might handle fault tolerance >> distribution better for some workloads. >> >> There's no one right answer. >> >> >> On 03/23/17 12:23, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: >>> Backing up from inside each VM doesn't solve the problem >>> If you have to backup 500VMs you just need more than 1 day >>> and what if you have to restore the whole gluster storage? >>> >>> How many days do you need to restore 1PB? >>> >>> Probably the only solution should be a georep in the same >>> datacenter/rack with a similiar cluster, >>> ready to became the master storage. >>> In this case you don't need to restore anything as data are >>> already there, >>> only a little bit back in time but this double the TCO >>> >>> Il 23 mar 2017 6:39 PM, "Serkan ?oban" >>> <cobanserkan at gmail.com <mailto:cobanserkan at gmail.com>> ha >>> scritto: >>> >>> Assuming a backup window of 12 hours, you need to send >>> data at 25GB/s >>> to backup solution. >>> Using 10G Ethernet on hosts you need at least 25 host to >>> handle 25GB/s. >>> You can create an EC gluster cluster that can handle >>> this rates, or >>> you just backup valuable data from inside VMs using open >>> source backup >>> tools like borg,attic,restic , etc... >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta >>> <gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com >>> <mailto:gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com>> wrote: >>> > Let's assume a 1PB storage full of VMs images with >>> each brick over ZFS, >>> > replica 3, sharding enabled >>> > >>> > How do you backup/restore that amount of data? >>> > >>> > Backing up daily is impossible, you'll never finish >>> the backup that the >>> > following one is starting (in other words, you need >>> more than 24 hours) >>> > >>> > Restoring is even worse. You need more than 24 hours >>> with the whole cluster >>> > down >>> > >>> > You can't rely on ZFS snapshot due to sharding (the >>> snapshot took from one >>> > node is useless without all other node related at the >>> same shard) and you >>> > still have the same restore speed >>> > >>> > How do you backup this? >>> > >>> > Even georep isn't enough, if you have to restore the >>> whole storage in case >>> > of disaster >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Gluster-users mailing list >>> > Gluster-users at gluster.org >>> <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org> >>> > >>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>> <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gluster-users mailing list >>> Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org> >>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>> <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users> >> _______________________________________________ Gluster-users >> mailing list Gluster-users at gluster.org >> <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org> >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users> >>-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170323/e67b31dc/attachment.html>
Are backup consistent? What happens if the header on shard0 is synced referring to some data on shard450 and when rsync parse shard450 this data is changed by subsequent writes? Header would be backupped of sync respect the rest of the image Il 23 mar 2017 8:48 PM, "Joe Julian" <joe at julianfamily.org> ha scritto:> The rsync protocol only passes blocks that have actually changed. Raw > changes fewer bits. You're right, though, that it still has to check the > entire file for those changes. > > On 03/23/17 12:47, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > > Raw or qcow doesn't change anything about the backup. > Georep always have to sync the whole file > > Additionally, raw images has much less features than qcow > > Il 23 mar 2017 8:40 PM, "Joe Julian" <joe at julianfamily.org> ha scritto: > >> I always use raw images. And yes, sharding would also be good. >> >> On 03/23/17 12:36, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: >> >> Georep expose to another problem: >> When using gluster as storage for VM, the VM file is saved as qcow. >> Changes are inside the qcow, thus rsync has to sync the whole file every >> time >> >> A little workaround would be sharding, as rsync has to sync only the >> changed shards, but I don't think this is a good solution >> >> Il 23 mar 2017 8:33 PM, "Joe Julian" <joe at julianfamily.org> ha scritto: >> >>> In many cases, a full backup set is just not feasible. Georep to the >>> same or different DC may be an option if the bandwidth can keep up with the >>> change set. If not, maybe breaking the data up into smaller more manageable >>> volumes where you only keep a smaller set of critical data and just back >>> that up. Perhaps an object store (swift?) might handle fault tolerance >>> distribution better for some workloads. >>> >>> There's no one right answer. >>> >>> On 03/23/17 12:23, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: >>> >>> Backing up from inside each VM doesn't solve the problem >>> If you have to backup 500VMs you just need more than 1 day and what if >>> you have to restore the whole gluster storage? >>> >>> How many days do you need to restore 1PB? >>> >>> Probably the only solution should be a georep in the same >>> datacenter/rack with a similiar cluster, >>> ready to became the master storage. >>> In this case you don't need to restore anything as data are already >>> there, >>> only a little bit back in time but this double the TCO >>> >>> Il 23 mar 2017 6:39 PM, "Serkan ?oban" <cobanserkan at gmail.com> ha >>> scritto: >>> >>>> Assuming a backup window of 12 hours, you need to send data at 25GB/s >>>> to backup solution. >>>> Using 10G Ethernet on hosts you need at least 25 host to handle 25GB/s. >>>> You can create an EC gluster cluster that can handle this rates, or >>>> you just backup valuable data from inside VMs using open source backup >>>> tools like borg,attic,restic , etc... >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta >>>> <gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > Let's assume a 1PB storage full of VMs images with each brick over >>>> ZFS, >>>> > replica 3, sharding enabled >>>> > >>>> > How do you backup/restore that amount of data? >>>> > >>>> > Backing up daily is impossible, you'll never finish the backup that >>>> the >>>> > following one is starting (in other words, you need more than 24 >>>> hours) >>>> > >>>> > Restoring is even worse. You need more than 24 hours with the whole >>>> cluster >>>> > down >>>> > >>>> > You can't rely on ZFS snapshot due to sharding (the snapshot took >>>> from one >>>> > node is useless without all other node related at the same shard) and >>>> you >>>> > still have the same restore speed >>>> > >>>> > How do you backup this? >>>> > >>>> > Even georep isn't enough, if you have to restore the whole storage in >>>> case >>>> > of disaster >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > Gluster-users mailing list >>>> > Gluster-users at gluster.org >>>> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gluster-users mailing listGluster-users at gluster.orghttp://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>> >>> _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing >>> list Gluster-users at gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailm >>> an/listinfo/gluster-users >> >>-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170323/1c27f57c/attachment.html>