Gandalf Corvotempesta
2017-Feb-22 21:43 UTC
[Gluster-users] distribute replicated volume and tons of questions
Maybe but the same server was used for years with ext4 up to about 3 month ago without a single issue Il 22 feb 2017 10:27 PM, "Ivan Rossi" <rouge2507 at gmail.com> ha scritto:> Isn't it possible that you had other problems? > I find XFS extremely reliable. I have been using XFS only for more thanhsn > a decade and I had a problem once, and it was due to hardware failures a > controller... > > Il 22/feb/2017 21:19, "Gandalf Corvotempesta" < > gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> ha scritto: > >> 2017-02-22 21:16 GMT+01:00 Joe Julian <joe at julianfamily.org>: >> > I've been using btrfs for that. In my own tests, btrfs has performed >> better >> > for my use cases. >> >> I had about 7 XFS crashes in 2 month on my backup server. >> *every* time i had to run xfs_repair to fix. It took 18hours, the >> second time. The first failed due to OOM (16GB) >> I don't think you'll be able to run fsck in parallel on 12 disks at >> the same time, the server will crash. I also had crashes during an xfs >> repair. >> >> No, i'll never use XFS again. >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-users mailing list >> Gluster-users at gluster.org >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170222/b5f2281c/attachment.html>