Shyam
2017-Feb-01 01:42 UTC
[Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] IMP: Release 3.10 beta1 tagging (day-to-day slip and updates)
Update day 2: 1) Brick multiplexing patch is merged into master, and now backported to release-3.10. Yay! Please review the backport and provide the scores, so that a merge and possible beta1 tarball creation can happen tomorrow. Backport: https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16496/ 2) Thanks for reviews on https://review.gluster.org/#/c/15745/ these comments have been addressed by Jeff, so if final(?) review scores can be updated, this can also be backported and merged to release-3.10. 3) There are no reviews for https://review.gluster.org/#/c/15645/ Request, Xavi, Niels and Poornima (who have reviewed the patch earlier) to take a look at it. 4) I am not seeing release notes being updated (other than glusterd related changes). Request (in order of features listed in the release-notes), Jeff, Nithya, Hari, Kaleb, Poornima, Niels, Anoop, to please provide the required notes as commits, or respond here that there are none for their feature. This is important for the beta. Thanks, Shyam On 01/30/2017 02:55 PM, Shyam wrote:> Hi, > > Before the release of 3.10 beta1, we are awaiting the merge of the > following commits on master, and a backport of the same into the 3.10 > branch. All these commits relate to the brick multiplexing feature, and > hence I request concerned developers attention towards reviewing the > same and providing the required review scores. > > # Patches pending review/merge and backport: > - https://review.gluster.org/14763 (core: run many bricks within one > glusterfsd process) > > - https://review.gluster.org/15645 (libglusterfs: make memory pools more > thread-friendly) > > - https://review.gluster.org/15745 (libglusterfs+transport+io-threads: > fix 256KB stack abuse) > > # Release notes pending: > We further need release notes per feature updated in the 3.10.0 release > notes. This [1] is an initial commit for the same, I will be merging it > if the regressions pass, else request Raghavendra Talur to nurture it in > the IST TZ, so that others can start adding commits that update this page. > > When doing so, please use the BZ as in [2] for the commit. > > Please try an update the release notes for your feature ASAP, so that we > do not hold back beta1 for the same. > > # Current beta1 target date: 01-Feb-2017 > > # Further schedule > Once we have beta1 ready, we would need to get testing feedback from the > community, and also testing feedback from the maintainers before > releasing. Your assistance and timeliness in this phase is needed, to > get a quality release out, so request some attention on testing in the > near future. > > Thanks, > Shyam > > [1] Release notes: https://review.gluster.org/16481 > [2] Bug to update release notes: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1417735 > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel at gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Shyam
2017-Feb-02 01:04 UTC
[Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] IMP: Release 3.10 beta1 tagging (day-to-day slip and updates)
Release notes are still pending, other comments *inline*. Tomorrow we will release beta1 for the package maintainers to roll out the packages. On 01/31/2017 08:42 PM, Shyam wrote:> Update day 2: > > 1) Brick multiplexing patch is merged into master, and now backported to > release-3.10. Yay! > > Please review the backport and provide the scores, so that a merge and > possible beta1 tarball creation can happen tomorrow. > > Backport: https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16496/The above is merged.> > 2) Thanks for reviews on https://review.gluster.org/#/c/15745/ these > comments have been addressed by Jeff, so if final(?) review scores can > be updated, this can also be backported and merged to release-3.10.Thanks Nithya, I completed the review and this is in. Jeff, request a backport to 3.10 branch> > 3) There are no reviews for https://review.gluster.org/#/c/15645/ > > Request, Xavi, Niels and Poornima (who have reviewed the patch earlier) > to take a look at it.Thanks Xavi, looks like Jeff has addressed your comments, so if you get a chance, score this again (or as per your last comment where you had no major exceptions to the patch we will take it in)> > 4) I am not seeing release notes being updated (other than glusterd > related changes). > > Request (in order of features listed in the release-notes), Jeff, > Nithya, Hari, Kaleb, Poornima, Niels, Anoop, to please provide the > required notes as commits, or respond here that there are none for their > feature. This is important for the beta.Thanks Kaleb, Nithya for the release notes. I am still awaiting the same from others, please respond, I am waiting one last day for this before rolling with commit messages and my understanding of the feature into the release notes.> > Thanks, > Shyam > > On 01/30/2017 02:55 PM, Shyam wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Before the release of 3.10 beta1, we are awaiting the merge of the >> following commits on master, and a backport of the same into the 3.10 >> branch. All these commits relate to the brick multiplexing feature, and >> hence I request concerned developers attention towards reviewing the >> same and providing the required review scores. >> >> # Patches pending review/merge and backport: >> - https://review.gluster.org/14763 (core: run many bricks within one >> glusterfsd process) >> >> - https://review.gluster.org/15645 (libglusterfs: make memory pools more >> thread-friendly) >> >> - https://review.gluster.org/15745 (libglusterfs+transport+io-threads: >> fix 256KB stack abuse) >> >> # Release notes pending: >> We further need release notes per feature updated in the 3.10.0 release >> notes. This [1] is an initial commit for the same, I will be merging it >> if the regressions pass, else request Raghavendra Talur to nurture it in >> the IST TZ, so that others can start adding commits that update this >> page. >> >> When doing so, please use the BZ as in [2] for the commit. >> >> Please try an update the release notes for your feature ASAP, so that we >> do not hold back beta1 for the same. >> >> # Current beta1 target date: 01-Feb-2017 >> >> # Further schedule >> Once we have beta1 ready, we would need to get testing feedback from the >> community, and also testing feedback from the maintainers before >> releasing. Your assistance and timeliness in this phase is needed, to >> get a quality release out, so request some attention on testing in the >> near future. >> >> Thanks, >> Shyam >> >> [1] Release notes: https://review.gluster.org/16481 >> [2] Bug to update release notes: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1417735 >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> Gluster-devel at gluster.org >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel at gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel