Gluster users - Feb 2017 - [Gluster-devel] IMP: Release 3.10 beta1 tagging (day-to-day slip and updates)

Hi,

Before the release of 3.10 beta1, we are awaiting the merge of the 
following commits on master, and a backport of the same into the 3.10 
branch. All these commits relate to the brick multiplexing feature, and 
hence I request concerned developers attention towards reviewing the 
same and providing the required review scores.

# Patches pending review/merge and backport:
- https://review.gluster.org/14763 (core: run many bricks within one 
glusterfsd process)

- https://review.gluster.org/15645 (libglusterfs: make memory pools more 
thread-friendly)

- https://review.gluster.org/15745 (libglusterfs+transport+io-threads: 
fix 256KB stack abuse)

# Release notes pending:
We further need release notes per feature updated in the 3.10.0 release 
notes. This [1] is an initial commit for the same, I will be merging it 
if the regressions pass, else request Raghavendra Talur to nurture it in 
the IST TZ, so that others can start adding commits that update this page.

When doing so, please use the BZ as in [2] for the commit.

Please try an update the release notes for your feature ASAP, so that we 
do not hold back beta1 for the same.

# Current beta1 target date: 01-Feb-2017

# Further schedule
Once we have beta1 ready, we would need to get testing feedback from the 
community, and also testing feedback from the maintainers before 
releasing. Your assistance and timeliness in this phase is needed, to 
get a quality release out, so request some attention on testing in the 
near future.

Thanks,
Shyam

[1] Release notes: https://review.gluster.org/16481
[2] Bug to update release notes: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1417735

Update day 2:

1) Brick multiplexing patch is merged into master, and now backported to 
release-3.10. Yay!

Please review the backport and provide the scores, so that a merge and 
possible beta1 tarball creation can happen tomorrow.

Backport: https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16496/

2) Thanks for reviews on https://review.gluster.org/#/c/15745/ these 
comments have been addressed by Jeff, so if final(?) review scores can 
be updated, this can also be backported and merged to release-3.10.

3) There are no reviews for https://review.gluster.org/#/c/15645/

Request, Xavi, Niels and Poornima (who have reviewed the patch earlier) 
to take a look at it.

4) I am not seeing release notes being updated (other than glusterd 
related changes).

Request (in order of features listed in the release-notes), Jeff, 
Nithya, Hari, Kaleb, Poornima, Niels, Anoop, to please provide the 
required notes as commits, or respond here that there are none for their 
feature. This is important for the beta.

Thanks,
Shyam

On 01/30/2017 02:55 PM, Shyam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Before the release of 3.10 beta1, we are awaiting the merge of the
> following commits on master, and a backport of the same into the 3.10
> branch. All these commits relate to the brick multiplexing feature, and
> hence I request concerned developers attention towards reviewing the
> same and providing the required review scores.
>
> # Patches pending review/merge and backport:
> - https://review.gluster.org/14763 (core: run many bricks within one
> glusterfsd process)
>
> - https://review.gluster.org/15645 (libglusterfs: make memory pools more
> thread-friendly)
>
> - https://review.gluster.org/15745 (libglusterfs+transport+io-threads:
> fix 256KB stack abuse)
>
> # Release notes pending:
> We further need release notes per feature updated in the 3.10.0 release
> notes. This [1] is an initial commit for the same, I will be merging it
> if the regressions pass, else request Raghavendra Talur to nurture it in
> the IST TZ, so that others can start adding commits that update this page.
>
> When doing so, please use the BZ as in [2] for the commit.
>
> Please try an update the release notes for your feature ASAP, so that we
> do not hold back beta1 for the same.
>
> # Current beta1 target date: 01-Feb-2017
>
> # Further schedule
> Once we have beta1 ready, we would need to get testing feedback from the
> community, and also testing feedback from the maintainers before
> releasing. Your assistance and timeliness in this phase is needed, to
> get a quality release out, so request some attention on testing in the
> near future.
>
> Thanks,
> Shyam
>
> [1] Release notes: https://review.gluster.org/16481
> [2] Bug to update release notes:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1417735
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel