ABHISHEK PALIWAL
2016-Dec-01 02:28 UTC
[Gluster-users] glusterfsd/glusterfs process taking CPU load higher than usual
Please reply I am waiting for your response. On Nov 30, 2016 2:21 PM, "ABHISHEK PALIWAL" <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote:> could you please respond on this issue? > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:56 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hi Team, >> >> I have two board setup and on which we have one volume with two brick on >> each board. >> >> When I was checking the cpu load I found glusterfsd/glusterfs process >> taking higher CPU load then usual like below: >> >> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ >> COMMAND >> 3117 root 20 0 1429m 48m 3636 R 98 0.2 212:12.35 >> fpipt_main_thre >> 12299 root 20 0 1139m 52m 4192 R 73 0.2 120:41.69 >> glusterfsd >> 4517 root 20 0 1139m 52m 4192 S 72 0.2 121:01.54 >> glusterfsd >> 1915 root 20 0 1139m 52m 4192 R 62 0.2 121:16.22 >> glusterfsd >> 14633 root 20 0 1139m 52m 4192 S 62 0.2 120:37.13 >> glusterfsd >> 1992 root 20 0 634m 154m 4340 S 57 0.7 68:11.18 >> glusterfs >> 17886 root 20 0 1139m 52m 4192 R 55 0.2 120:28.57 >> glusterfsd >> 2664 root 20 0 783m 31m 4708 S 52 0.1 100:13.12 >> Scc_SctpHost_pr >> 1914 root 20 0 1139m 52m 4192 S 50 0.2 121:20.19 >> glusterfsd >> 12556 root 20 0 1139m 52m 4192 S 50 0.2 120:31.38 >> glusterfsd >> 1583 root 20 0 1139m 52m 4192 R 48 0.2 121:16.83 >> glusterfsd >> 12112 root 20 0 1139m 52m 4192 R 43 0.2 120:58.73 >> glusterfsd >> >> Is there any way to identify the way or to reduce this high load. >> >> I have also collected the volume profile logs but don't know how to >> understand or analyze those logs. >> >> I am attaching those logs here. >> -- >> Regards >> Abhishek Paliwal >> > > > > -- > > > > > Regards > Abhishek Paliwal >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20161201/e064ff59/attachment.html>
ABHISHEK PALIWAL
2016-Dec-01 13:01 UTC
[Gluster-users] glusterfsd/glusterfs process taking CPU load higher than usual
is there anyone who can reply on this query? On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:58 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote:> Please reply I am waiting for your response. > On Nov 30, 2016 2:21 PM, "ABHISHEK PALIWAL" <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> could you please respond on this issue? >> >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:56 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL < >> abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Team, >>> >>> I have two board setup and on which we have one volume with two brick on >>> each board. >>> >>> When I was checking the cpu load I found glusterfsd/glusterfs process >>> taking higher CPU load then usual like below: >>> >>> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ >>> COMMAND >>> 3117 root 20 0 1429m 48m 3636 R 98 0.2 212:12.35 >>> fpipt_main_thre >>> 12299 root 20 0 1139m 52m 4192 R 73 0.2 120:41.69 >>> glusterfsd >>> 4517 root 20 0 1139m 52m 4192 S 72 0.2 121:01.54 >>> glusterfsd >>> 1915 root 20 0 1139m 52m 4192 R 62 0.2 121:16.22 >>> glusterfsd >>> 14633 root 20 0 1139m 52m 4192 S 62 0.2 120:37.13 >>> glusterfsd >>> 1992 root 20 0 634m 154m 4340 S 57 0.7 68:11.18 >>> glusterfs >>> 17886 root 20 0 1139m 52m 4192 R 55 0.2 120:28.57 >>> glusterfsd >>> 2664 root 20 0 783m 31m 4708 S 52 0.1 100:13.12 >>> Scc_SctpHost_pr >>> 1914 root 20 0 1139m 52m 4192 S 50 0.2 121:20.19 >>> glusterfsd >>> 12556 root 20 0 1139m 52m 4192 S 50 0.2 120:31.38 >>> glusterfsd >>> 1583 root 20 0 1139m 52m 4192 R 48 0.2 121:16.83 >>> glusterfsd >>> 12112 root 20 0 1139m 52m 4192 R 43 0.2 120:58.73 >>> glusterfsd >>> >>> Is there any way to identify the way or to reduce this high load. >>> >>> I have also collected the volume profile logs but don't know how to >>> understand or analyze those logs. >>> >>> I am attaching those logs here. >>> -- >>> Regards >>> Abhishek Paliwal >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> >> Regards >> Abhishek Paliwal >> >-- Regards Abhishek Paliwal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20161201/7c7e85c5/attachment.html>