Gluster users - Nov 2016 - 回复： How to distributed with a folder

if you are worrying about the disk failure will bring all your data
unavailable,the distributed replica volume is a good choice.

2016?11?17?????jin deng <cheneydeng88 at gmail.com
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cheneydeng88 at
gmail.com');>> ???
>
>
> 2016?11?17??????? <dylan-lili at foxmail.com> ???
>
>> In distributed volume, the files will be distributed to different
>> bricks.But,my data is a folder if it's lack of a file,the folder of
data
>> will be disabled.So, I want a specific folder will be store one brick
to
>> avoid dropping a brick and all data is disable.
>>
>
>  I don't understand your purpose.It seems you want all your data which
> inside one specific directory to be stored on a fixed brick(without dht)
> instead of letting the data dispersed among all bricks.IMO,that violates
> the model of "distributed volume".Not sure if i've
misunderstood your
> purpose.Maybe someone will give a different opinion.
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> DengJin
>
>
-- 
Thanks,
DengJin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20161117/fc1e8aae/attachment.html>

Thanks for your reply ! I have many data folders such as data1,data2... and this
data folders contains some files. The data will be disable if one files missed.
I use distributed volume storage the data folders and the files of data folder
is distributed to all bricks. The all data folders will be disable if   one
brick down. I think out the distributed replica volume,but disk utilization is 
less than 50% whth replica volume.I can put up with some data missing ,but I
cann't tolerate all data being disable. So,I want the data folder storage
just one brick,so that ,if one brick down , it has some data folder disable in
this brick and other data is well.
 
Thanks,
LiLi
 
------------------
----------------------??

 




------------------ ???? ------------------
???: "jin deng"<cheneydeng88 at gmail.com>; 
????: 2016?11?17?(???) ??4:13
???: "??"<dylan-lili at foxmail.com>; 
??: "gluster-users"<gluster-users at gluster.org>; 
??: [Gluster-users] How to distributed with a folder



if you are worrying about the disk failure will bring all your data
unavailable,the distributed replica volume is a good choice.

2016?11?17?????jin deng <cheneydeng88 at gmail.com> ???


2016?11?17??????? <dylan-lili at foxmail.com> ???
In distributed volume, the files will be distributed to different bricks.But,my
data is a folder if it's lack of a file,the folder of data will be
disabled.So, I want a specific folder will be store one brick to avoid dropping
a brick and all data is disable.


 I don't understand your purpose.It seems you want all your data which
inside one specific directory to be stored on a fixed brick(without dht) instead
of letting the data dispersed among all bricks.IMO,that violates the model of
"distributed volume".Not sure if i've misunderstood your
purpose.Maybe someone will give a different opinion.
 

-- 
Thanks,DengJin


  

-- 
Thanks,DengJin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20161117/567022bd/attachment.html>