2016?11?17??????? <dylan-lili at foxmail.com
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dylan-lili at
foxmail.com');>> ???
> In distributed volume, the files will be distributed to different
> bricks.But,my data is a folder if it's lack of a file,the folder of
data
> will be disabled.So, I want a specific folder will be store one brick to
> avoid dropping a brick and all data is disable.
>
I don't understand your purpose.It seems you want all your data which
inside one specific directory to be stored on a fixed brick(without dht)
instead of letting the data dispersed among all bricks.IMO,that violates
the model of "distributed volume".Not sure if i've misunderstood
your
purpose.Maybe someone will give a different opinion.
--
Thanks,
DengJin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20161117/696380fa/attachment.html>