On 16 November 2016 at 00:06, Kevin Leigeb <kevin.leigeb at wisc.edu>
wrote:
> I guess I don?t understand why in some cases we only have these link-to
> files and not the new data files. Nothing has been overwritten, unless it
> was by gluster.
>
>
>
Could the linkto files might have been copied by rsync overwriting the
original data files? Was rsync run consecutively on each brick?
How can I tell if a file shows as the initial size, but isn?t
actually> using disk space?
>
>
>
du -h <filename> will show you the actual disk usage
> What should the contents of one of these link-to files look like if I try
> to open it with less or some other program?
>
>
>
It will probably show junk characters as it is not a valid file.
It is highly recommended that you perform all such operations from the
gluster mount in future as there are several internal operations that are
performed.
Thanks,
Nithya
>
>
> *From:* Nithya Balachandran [mailto:nbalacha at redhat.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 15, 2016 10:55 AM
> *To:* Kevin Leigeb <kevin.leigeb at wisc.edu>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster File Abnormalities
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 15 November 2016 at 22:15, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at
redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On 15 November 2016 at 21:59, Kevin Leigeb <kevin.leigeb at wisc.edu>
wrote:
>
> Nithya -
>
>
>
> Thanks for the reply, I will send this at the top to keep the thread from
> getting really ugly.
>
>
>
> We did indeed copy from the individual bricks in an effort to speed up the
> copy. We had one rsync running from each brick to the mount point for the
> new cluster. As stated, we skipped all files with size 0 so that stub files
> wouldn?t be copied. Some files with permissions of 1000 (equivalent to
> ---------T) were larger than 0 and were also copied.
>
>
>
> I?m mostly trying to ascertain why such files would exist (failed
> rebalance?) and what we can do about this problem.
>
>
>
> Rebalance creates these linkto files as targets for the file migration -
> while the file size displayed would be nonzero, the actual disk usage for
> such files would be zero.
>
>
>
> Missed one crucial point - the rebalance sets the size of these linkto
> files to that of the original file.
>
>
>
> The rebalance process first creates these files and then checks if it is
> possible to migrate the file. If not, it just leaves it there as it is not
> using up any space and will be ignored by gluster clients. It is not a
> failed rebalance - sometimes some files are not migrated because of space
> constraints and they are considered to have been skipped.
>
>
>
> This behaviour was modified as part of http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12347.
> We now reset the size to 0.
>
>
>
> I'm afraid, if those files were overwritten by their linkto files, the
> only way forward would be to restore from a backup.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Nithya
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin
>
>
>
> *From:* Nithya Balachandran [mailto:nbalacha at redhat.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 15, 2016 10:21 AM
> *To:* Kevin Leigeb <kevin.leigeb at wisc.edu>
> *Cc:* gluster-users at gluster.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster File Abnormalities
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi kevin,
>
>
>
> On 15 November 2016 at 20:56, Kevin Leigeb <kevin.leigeb at wisc.edu>
wrote:
>
> All -
>
>
>
> We recently moved from an old cluster running 3.7.9 to a new one running
> 3.8.4. To move the data we rsync?d all files from the old gluster nodes
> that were not in the .glusterfs directory and had a size of greater-than
> zero (to avoid stub files) through the front-end of the new cluster.
>
>
>
> Did you rsync via the mount point or directly from the bricks?
>
>
>
> However, it has recently come to our attention that some of the files
> copied over were already ?corrupted? on the old back-end. That is, these
> files had permissions of 1000 (like a stub file) yet were the full size of
> the actual file.
>
>
>
> Does this correspond to a file permission of ___T when viewed using ls? If
> yes, these are dht linkto files. They were possibly created during a
> rebalance and left behind because the file was skipped. They should be
> ignored when accessing the gluster volume via the mount point.
>
>
>
> In some cases, these were the only copies of the file that existed at all
> on any of the bricks, in others, another version of the file existed that
> was also full size and had the proper permissions. In some cases, we
> believe, these correct files were rsync?d but then overwritten by the 1000
> permission version resulting in a useless file on the new cluster.
>
>
>
> This sounds like you were running rsync directly on the bricks. Can you
> please confirm if that is the case?
>
>
>
> These files are thought by the OS to be binaries when trying to open them
> using vim, but they are actually text files (or at least were originally).
> We can cat the file to see that it has a length of zero and so far that is
> our only reliable test to find which files are indeed corrupted (find .
> -type f | xargs wc -l). With nearly 50 million files on our cluster, this
> is really a non-starter because of the speed.
>
>
>
> Has anyone seen this issue previously? We?re hoping to find a solution
> that doesn?t involve overthinking the problem and thought this might be a
> great place to start.
>
>
>
> Let me know if there?s any info I may have omitted that could be of
> further use.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nithya
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20161116/8aa639ce/attachment.html>