Hi Jackie,
Here is the sample output of scrub status where two files are corrupted.
root at FEDORA2:$gluster vol bitrot master scrub status
Volume name : master
State of scrub: Active (Idle)
Scrub impact: lazy
Scrub frequency: biweekly
Bitrot error log location: /var/log/glusterfs/bitd.log
Scrubber error log location: /var/log/glusterfs/scrub.log
========================================================
Node: localhost
Number of Scrubbed files: 4
Number of Skipped files: 0
Last completed scrub time: 2016-10-27 05:03:23
Duration of last scrub (D:M:H:M:S): 0:0:0:5
Error count: 2
Corrupted object's [GFID]:
b912c776-7253-4418-a35f-a37661d673b6
f63cb6fe-123d-4e4b-a6f1-d830f7f5392a
========================================================
Thanks and Regards,
Kotresh H R
----- Original Message -----> From: "Jackie Tung" <jackie at drive.ai>
> To: "Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar" <khiremat at redhat.com>
> Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 8:34:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] bitrot log messages
>
> That?s great, thank you! We plan to automatically look for these signs.
>
> For ?scrub status?, do you have a sample output for a positive hit you
could
> share easily?
>
> > On Oct 26, 2016, at 12:05 AM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar
> > <khiremat at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Correcting the command..I had missed 'scrub' keyword.
> >
> > "gluster vol bitrot <volname> scrub status"
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> > Kotresh H R
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar" <khiremat at
redhat.com>
> >> To: "Jackie Tung" <jackie at drive.ai>
> >> Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org
> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 10:53:50 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] bitrot log messages
> >>
> >> Hi Jackie,
> >>
> >> "gluster vol bitrot <volname> status" should show
the corrupted files
> >> gfid.
> >> If you want to get the info from logs, it will be logged as below.
> >>
> >> [2016-10-26 05:21:20.767774] A [MSGID: 118023]
> >> [bit-rot-scrub.c:246:bitd_compare_ckum] 0-master-bit-rot-0:
CORRUPTION
> >> DETECTED: Object /dir1/file1 {Brick: /bricks/brick1/b10 | GFID:
> >> b912c776-7253-4418-a35f-a37661d673b6}
> >> [2016-10-26 05:21:20.770294] A [MSGID: 118024]
> >> [bit-rot-scrub.c:266:bitd_compare_ckum] 0-master-bit-rot-0:
Marking
> >> /dir1/file1 [GFID: b912c776-7253-4418-a35f-a37661d673b6 | Brick:
> >> /bricks/brick1/b10] as corrupted..
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks and Regards,
> >> Kotresh H R
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Jackie Tung" <jackie at drive.ai>
> >>> To: gluster-users at gluster.org
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 2:14:28 AM
> >>> Subject: [Gluster-users] bitrot log messages
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Redhat documentation says that things will get logged to
bitd.log, and
> >>> scrub.log. These files are pretty big - even when we only take
the ? E ?
> >>> log
> >>> level lines.
> >>>
> >>>
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Storage/3.1/html/Administration_Guide/chap-Detecting_Data_Corruption.html
> >>>
> >>> Anyone know which particular message patterns we should be
actively
> >>> looking
> >>> for to detect bitrot?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Jackie
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The information in this email is confidential and may be
legally
> >>> privileged.
> >>> It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email
by anyone
> >>> else
> >>> is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure,
> >>> copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in
> >>> reliance
> >>> on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Gluster-users mailing list
> >>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> >>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Gluster-users mailing list
> >> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
>
> --
>
>
> The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
> taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
>