> hi Serkan, > At the moment there is no tool which does this. We can write one, > which will do the reconstruction. What are the requirements? When would you > like to use it? Why do you not want the gluster processes to run? Should the > tool connect to the machines on which the fragments are stored and then > construct the file and write it somewhere or will all the chunks be copied > somewhere and we run the tool locally?Hi Pranith, I want to use the tool in case of disaster. If somehow we cannot start gluster or some problem happened during upgrade and we cannot roll back or continue I don't want to loose my files. I prefer the tool connects to machines and reconstruct the files to some other path... It would be great if you write such a tool. Thanks, Serkan
Gandalf Corvotempesta
2016-Aug-27 09:01 UTC
[Gluster-users] Data reconstruction from an EC volume
il 25 gen 2016 15:29, "Serkan ?oban" <cobanserkan at gmail.com> ha scritto:> Hi Pranith, > > I want to use the tool in case of disaster. > If somehow we cannot start gluster or some problem happened duringupgrade and> we cannot roll back or continue I don't want to loose my files. > I prefer the tool connects to machines and reconstruct the files to > some other path... > It would be great if you write such a tool.I'm also waiting for this having a *standalone* tools that would be able to reconstruct files in case of disaster would be great. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160827/97b0f9f9/attachment.html>
Xavier Hernandez
2016-Sep-01 08:10 UTC
[Gluster-users] Data reconstruction from an EC volume
Hi, On 27/08/16 11:01, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:> il 25 gen 2016 15:29, "Serkan ?oban" <cobanserkan at gmail.com > <mailto:cobanserkan at gmail.com>> ha scritto: >> Hi Pranith, >> >> I want to use the tool in case of disaster. >> If somehow we cannot start gluster or some problem happened during > upgrade and >> we cannot roll back or continue I don't want to loose my files. >> I prefer the tool connects to machines and reconstruct the files to >> some other path... >> It would be great if you write such a tool. > > I'm also waiting for this > having a *standalone* tools that would be able to reconstruct files in > case of disaster would be great.I've this in my todo list. Not sure when I'll be able to do that though. BTW, should the tool be able to connect directly to the bricks ? or is it enough if it can reconstruct the file from the fragments manually copied in local ? Xavi> > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >