Gluster users - Aug 2016 - 转发: 转发: glusterfs chmod/chown bug 1343362

yanping.gao at xtaotech.com
 
???? yanping.gao at xtaotech.com
????? 2016-08-19 19:07
???? ndevos; gluster-devel
??? gluster-devel
??? ??: ??: glusterfs chmod/chown bug 1343362




yanping.gao at xtaotech.com
 
???? yanping.gao at xtaotech.com
????? 2016-08-17 16:05
???? 
??? gluster-devel
??? ??: glusterfs chmod/chown bug 1343362

 
???? yanping.gao at xtaotech.com
????? 2016-08-17 14:33
???? thottanjiffin; kshlmster
??? javen.wu; peng.hse
??? glusterfs chmod/chown bug 1343362
hello:
       Thanks  thotz and kshlm  for your fix of the problem glusterfs bug1343362
      
https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/commit/c04ee47d1e9847b50c459734a42681450005ee60

       I  am aware that you splited the two variables to store the argument of
setattr and the lookup returned attr. I was thinking increasing the size of
       call_state_t structure only for the problem might consume more memory for
all irrelevant operations. I am trying another method and looking forward to
your advise.
       You can visit it here 
https://github.com/YanyunGao/glusterfs/commit/f4e248ce2fd4cea74c19d7c9bc9a3fcd7f8edaca
   
How do you think?
  
  Thanks


yanping.gao at xtaotech.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160819/51a18e72/attachment.html>

Adding Jiffin, Kaushal to the thread

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:38 PM, yanping.gao at xtaotech.com <
yanping.gao at xtaotech.com> wrote:
>
>
> ------------------------------
> yanping.gao at xtaotech.com
>
>
> *????* yanping.gao at xtaotech.com
> *?????* 2016-08-19 19:07
> *????* ndevos <ndevos at redhat.com>; gluster-devel
> <gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> *???* gluster-devel <gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> *???* ??: ??: glusterfs chmod/chown bug 1343362
>
>
> ------------------------------
> yanping.gao at xtaotech.com
>
>
> *????* yanping.gao at xtaotech.com
> *?????* 2016-08-17 16:05
> *????*
> *???* gluster-devel <gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> *???* ??: glusterfs chmod/chown bug 1343362
>
>
> *????* yanping.gao at xtaotech.com
> *?????* 2016-08-17 14:33
> *????* thottanjiffin <thottanjiffin at gmail.com>; kshlmster
> <kshlmster at gmail.com>
> *???* javen.wu <javen.wu at xtaotech.com>; peng.hse <peng.hse at
xtaotech.com>
> *???* glusterfs chmod/chown bug 1343362
> hello:
>
>        Thanks  thotz and kshlm  for your fix of the problem glusterfs
> bug1343362
>        https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/commit/
> c04ee47d1e9847b50c459734a42681450005ee60
>
>
>        I  am aware that you splited the two variables to store the
> argument of setattr and the lookup returned attr. I was thinking
> increasing the size of
>        call_state_t structure only for the problem might consume more
> memory for all irrelevant operations. I am trying another method and
> looking forward to your advise.
>        You can visit it here  https://github.com/YanyunGao/
> glusterfs/commit/f4e248ce2fd4cea74c19d7c9bc9a3fcd7f8edaca
>
>
> How do you think?
>
>
>   Thanks
> ------------------------------
> yanping.gao at xtaotech.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>


-- 
Pranith
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160820/aa1e8937/attachment.html>