On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ndevos at redhat.com');>>
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 02:37:43PM +0530, Saravanakumar Arumugam wrote:
> >
> > On 08/07/2016 04:17 PM, ML mail wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Can someone explain me what is the op-version everybody is
speaking
> about on the mailing list?
> > op-version is a way to determine which gluster version you are
running.
> >
> > This is quite useful during upgrade process, to check for backward
> > compatibility.
> >
> > FYI -
> > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/master/libglusterf
> s/src/globals.h#L21
>
> Maybe there should be a page about the op-version at our upgrade guide
> (just got recently informed we have that page):
> http://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Upgrade-Guide/README/
Agreed, we should highlight about op-version when there is a new feature
introduced which requires a cluster op-version bump up. Probably having a
metric of release vs op-version would benefit users to understand what
op-version they should run with. Any takers for this change?
>
>
> Niels
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Gluster-users at
gluster.org');>
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
--
--Atin
--
--Atin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160808/dbc21f32/attachment.html>