Gandalf Corvotempesta
2016-Jul-14 09:21 UTC
[Gluster-users] New cluster - first experience
2016-07-14 11:19 GMT+02:00, Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com>:> Yes, but my iperf test was made with a wrong bonding configuration.Anyway, even with direct NFS mount (not involving gluster) i'm stuck as 60MB/s (480mbit/s) about 50% of available bandwidth with a single nic/connection. Any change to get this cluster faster ? Which speed are you seeing with gluster or nfs ? I would like to archieve the best possible speed before buying more powerful hardware (10Gb switches)
I am not sure if your nics support it but you could try balance-alb (bonding mode 6), this does not require special switch support and I have had good results with it. As Lindsey said the switch configuration could be limiting the bandwidth between nodes in balance-rr. On 14 July 2016 at 05:21, Gandalf Corvotempesta < gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote:> 2016-07-14 11:19 GMT+02:00, Gandalf Corvotempesta > <gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com>: > > Yes, but my iperf test was made with a wrong bonding configuration. > > Anyway, even with direct NFS mount (not involving gluster) i'm stuck > as 60MB/s (480mbit/s) > about 50% of available bandwidth with a single nic/connection. > > Any change to get this cluster faster ? > Which speed are you seeing with gluster or nfs ? I would like to > archieve the best possible speed before buying more powerful hardware > (10Gb switches) > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160714/d8051f62/attachment.html>